科学资本与科学劳动

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Isis Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1086/727682
Harun Küçük
{"title":"科学资本与科学劳动","authors":"Harun Küçük","doi":"10.1086/727682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a think piece that takes a labor and capital perspective on science to discuss two chief concepts: credit and exploitation. Credit, as the symbolic currency of science, has been central to how we understand the moral workings of science in the twentieth century. But our lived experience of changes in the political economy of science also alerts us to the notion that credit may not be applicable to a robust analysis of science in the past and in the present. Scientific exploitation, the evidence of which usually prompts an effort to redistribute credit, may offer only a partial picture of the labor structure of science. Self-exploitation, an implicit understanding of how scientists may approach their work, has never been fully articulated but is nevertheless a useful descriptive notion.","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"555 ","pages":"827 - 833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Capital and Scientific Labor\",\"authors\":\"Harun Küçük\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/727682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay is a think piece that takes a labor and capital perspective on science to discuss two chief concepts: credit and exploitation. Credit, as the symbolic currency of science, has been central to how we understand the moral workings of science in the twentieth century. But our lived experience of changes in the political economy of science also alerts us to the notion that credit may not be applicable to a robust analysis of science in the past and in the present. Scientific exploitation, the evidence of which usually prompts an effort to redistribute credit, may offer only a partial picture of the labor structure of science. Self-exploitation, an implicit understanding of how scientists may approach their work, has never been fully articulated but is nevertheless a useful descriptive notion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isis\",\"volume\":\"555 \",\"pages\":\"827 - 833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/727682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是一篇思考文章,从劳动和资本的角度来探讨科学的两个主要概念:信用和剥削。信用作为科学的象征性货币,一直是我们理解 20 世纪科学道德运作的核心。但是,我们对科学政治经济变化的亲身经历也提醒我们,信用可能并不适用于对过去和现在的科学进行有力的分析。科学剥削--其证据通常会促使人们努力重新分配信用--可能只能提供科学劳动结构的部分情况。自我剥削是对科学家如何对待其工作的一种隐含的理解,这种理解从未得到充分阐述,但却是一个有用的描述性概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific Capital and Scientific Labor
This essay is a think piece that takes a labor and capital perspective on science to discuss two chief concepts: credit and exploitation. Credit, as the symbolic currency of science, has been central to how we understand the moral workings of science in the twentieth century. But our lived experience of changes in the political economy of science also alerts us to the notion that credit may not be applicable to a robust analysis of science in the past and in the present. Scientific exploitation, the evidence of which usually prompts an effort to redistribute credit, may offer only a partial picture of the labor structure of science. Self-exploitation, an implicit understanding of how scientists may approach their work, has never been fully articulated but is nevertheless a useful descriptive notion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信