非殖 民地健康文学可以增加我们对伦理倾倒的思考

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICAL ETHICS
Cornelius Ewuoso
{"title":"非殖 民地健康文学可以增加我们对伦理倾倒的思考","authors":"Cornelius Ewuoso","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v16i10.14305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on the underexplored or novel accounts of inclusion and the moral accounts of decolonization in African health decolonial literature to increase our understanding of how ethics dumping manifests in health research partnerships, and what more ought to be done to eliminate this phenomenon. African decolonial health literature proposes “inclusion that matters” – conceptualized as substantial, respectful and deep engagement with African agency – as a solution to end domination or mitigate the “appearance” of inclusion. Based on this supposition, the harm of ethics dumping – and I demonstrate how – is that it fails to engage the agency of Africans, and listen to or echo their voices in health and health research collaborations on the continent, or research collaborations that have significant implications for them. This account of inclusion can usefully increase our thinking about ethics dumping, which is ultimately and in several ways a failure to practice responsible science. Research is required to increase our understanding of what could reasonably constitute responsible science from a variety of perspectives.","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonial health literature can increase our thinking about ethics dumping\",\"authors\":\"Cornelius Ewuoso\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jmehm.v16i10.14305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws on the underexplored or novel accounts of inclusion and the moral accounts of decolonization in African health decolonial literature to increase our understanding of how ethics dumping manifests in health research partnerships, and what more ought to be done to eliminate this phenomenon. African decolonial health literature proposes “inclusion that matters” – conceptualized as substantial, respectful and deep engagement with African agency – as a solution to end domination or mitigate the “appearance” of inclusion. Based on this supposition, the harm of ethics dumping – and I demonstrate how – is that it fails to engage the agency of Africans, and listen to or echo their voices in health and health research collaborations on the continent, or research collaborations that have significant implications for them. This account of inclusion can usefully increase our thinking about ethics dumping, which is ultimately and in several ways a failure to practice responsible science. Research is required to increase our understanding of what could reasonably constitute responsible science from a variety of perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v16i10.14305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v16i10.14305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文借鉴了非洲非殖民化卫生文献中关于包容和非殖民化道德问题的未充分探讨或新颖论述,以加深我们对伦理倾销在卫生研究合作中的表现形式以及消除这一现象应采取的更多措施的理解。非洲非殖民化卫生文献提出了 "有意义的包容"--其概念是与非洲机构进行实质性的、相互尊重的和深入的接触--作为结束统治或减轻包容 "表象 "的解决方案。基于这一假设,伦理倾弃的危害--我将展示如何危害--在于它未能让非洲人参与其中,未能在非洲大陆的卫生和健康研究合作中,或在对他们有重大影响的研究合作中倾听或呼应他们的声音。这种对包容的理解可以帮助我们更好地思考伦理倾弃问题,因为伦理倾弃归根结底在多个方面是一种未能践行负责任科学的行为。我们需要开展研究,从不同角度进一步了解什么是负责任的科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decolonial health literature can increase our thinking about ethics dumping
This article draws on the underexplored or novel accounts of inclusion and the moral accounts of decolonization in African health decolonial literature to increase our understanding of how ethics dumping manifests in health research partnerships, and what more ought to be done to eliminate this phenomenon. African decolonial health literature proposes “inclusion that matters” – conceptualized as substantial, respectful and deep engagement with African agency – as a solution to end domination or mitigate the “appearance” of inclusion. Based on this supposition, the harm of ethics dumping – and I demonstrate how – is that it fails to engage the agency of Africans, and listen to or echo their voices in health and health research collaborations on the continent, or research collaborations that have significant implications for them. This account of inclusion can usefully increase our thinking about ethics dumping, which is ultimately and in several ways a failure to practice responsible science. Research is required to increase our understanding of what could reasonably constitute responsible science from a variety of perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信