电池电动公交车还是燃料电池电动公交车?意大利布雷西亚市的脱碳案例研究

IF 2.7 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
F. Borghetti, Michela Longo, M. Bonera, Marco Libretti, C. Somaschini, Valentina Martinelli, Marco Medeghini, Renato Mazzoncini
{"title":"电池电动公交车还是燃料电池电动公交车?意大利布雷西亚市的脱碳案例研究","authors":"F. Borghetti, Michela Longo, M. Bonera, Marco Libretti, C. Somaschini, Valentina Martinelli, Marco Medeghini, Renato Mazzoncini","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures8120178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, designing and adopting sustainable and greener transport systems is of upmost interest. The European Commission and different EU countries are developing plans and programs—but also delivering resources—aimed at the decarbonization of cities and transport by 2030. In this paper, the case study of the city of Brescia, a city of about 200,000 inhabitants located in northern Italy, is addressed. Specifically, a preliminary operational and financial feasibility study is performed assuming the replacement of the entire compressed natural gas (CNG) powered bus fleet of a specific line; the two alternatives considered are battery electric buses (BEBs) and fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs). For the comparison and evaluation of the two alternatives, specific economic parameters of the three alternatives (BEB, FCEB and the current solution CNGB) were considered: CAPEX (CAPital EXpenditure) and OPEX (OPerational EXpenditure). This allowed us to determine the TCO (total cost of ownership) and TCRO (total cost and revenues of ownership) along three annuities (2022, 2025 and 2030). For the BEB alternative, the TCO and TCRO values are between EUR 0.58/km and EUR 0.91/km. In the case of the FCEB solution, the values of TCO and TCRO are between EUR 1.75/km and EUR 2.15/km. Considering the current CNGB solution, the TCO and TCRO values range between EUR 1.43/km and EUR 1.51/km.","PeriodicalId":13601,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battery Electric Buses or Fuel Cell Electric Buses? A Decarbonization Case Study in the City of Brescia, Italy\",\"authors\":\"F. Borghetti, Michela Longo, M. Bonera, Marco Libretti, C. Somaschini, Valentina Martinelli, Marco Medeghini, Renato Mazzoncini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/infrastructures8120178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, designing and adopting sustainable and greener transport systems is of upmost interest. The European Commission and different EU countries are developing plans and programs—but also delivering resources—aimed at the decarbonization of cities and transport by 2030. In this paper, the case study of the city of Brescia, a city of about 200,000 inhabitants located in northern Italy, is addressed. Specifically, a preliminary operational and financial feasibility study is performed assuming the replacement of the entire compressed natural gas (CNG) powered bus fleet of a specific line; the two alternatives considered are battery electric buses (BEBs) and fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs). For the comparison and evaluation of the two alternatives, specific economic parameters of the three alternatives (BEB, FCEB and the current solution CNGB) were considered: CAPEX (CAPital EXpenditure) and OPEX (OPerational EXpenditure). This allowed us to determine the TCO (total cost of ownership) and TCRO (total cost and revenues of ownership) along three annuities (2022, 2025 and 2030). For the BEB alternative, the TCO and TCRO values are between EUR 0.58/km and EUR 0.91/km. In the case of the FCEB solution, the values of TCO and TCRO are between EUR 1.75/km and EUR 2.15/km. Considering the current CNGB solution, the TCO and TCRO values range between EUR 1.43/km and EUR 1.51/km.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infrastructures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infrastructures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8120178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8120178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,设计和采用可持续的绿色交通系统已成为人们最关心的问题。欧盟委员会和欧盟各国正在制定计划和方案,同时也在提供资源,旨在到 2030 年实现城市和交通的去碳化。本文以位于意大利北部、拥有约 20 万居民的布雷西亚市为案例进行研究。具体而言,本文进行了一项初步的运营和财务可行性研究,假定更换一条特定线路的全部压缩天然气(CNG)动力公交车;考虑的两种替代方案是电池电动公交车(BEB)和燃料电池电动公交车(FCEB)。为了对两种替代方案进行比较和评估,考虑了三种替代方案(BEB、FCEB 和当前的 CNGB 解决方案)的具体经济参数:CAPEX(资本支出)和 OPEX(运营支出)。这样,我们就可以确定三个年限(2022 年、2025 年和 2030 年)的 TCO(总拥有成本)和 TCRO(总拥有成本和收入)。对于 BEB 备选方案,TCO 和 TCRO 值介于 0.58 欧元/公里和 0.91 欧元/公里之间。在 FCEB 解决方案中,总拥有成本和总可变资本成本介于 1.75 欧元/公里和 2.15 欧元/公里之间。考虑到目前的 CNGB 解决方案,总拥有成本和总可变资本成本值介于 1.43 欧元/公里和 1.51 欧元/公里之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Battery Electric Buses or Fuel Cell Electric Buses? A Decarbonization Case Study in the City of Brescia, Italy
Nowadays, designing and adopting sustainable and greener transport systems is of upmost interest. The European Commission and different EU countries are developing plans and programs—but also delivering resources—aimed at the decarbonization of cities and transport by 2030. In this paper, the case study of the city of Brescia, a city of about 200,000 inhabitants located in northern Italy, is addressed. Specifically, a preliminary operational and financial feasibility study is performed assuming the replacement of the entire compressed natural gas (CNG) powered bus fleet of a specific line; the two alternatives considered are battery electric buses (BEBs) and fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs). For the comparison and evaluation of the two alternatives, specific economic parameters of the three alternatives (BEB, FCEB and the current solution CNGB) were considered: CAPEX (CAPital EXpenditure) and OPEX (OPerational EXpenditure). This allowed us to determine the TCO (total cost of ownership) and TCRO (total cost and revenues of ownership) along three annuities (2022, 2025 and 2030). For the BEB alternative, the TCO and TCRO values are between EUR 0.58/km and EUR 0.91/km. In the case of the FCEB solution, the values of TCO and TCRO are between EUR 1.75/km and EUR 2.15/km. Considering the current CNGB solution, the TCO and TCRO values range between EUR 1.43/km and EUR 1.51/km.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infrastructures
Infrastructures Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信