使用三维成像技术比较评估最新第五代 ProTaper Next 和 Revo-S NiTi 旋转根管针的成型能力:基于成像的研究

Q3 Medicine
Prajna Pattanaik, Akilan Balasubramanian, P. Veeralakshmi, Gautam Singh, Vandana Sadananda, Hina Ahmed, J. Babu, C. Swarnalatha, A. Nayyar
{"title":"使用三维成像技术比较评估最新第五代 ProTaper Next 和 Revo-S NiTi 旋转根管针的成型能力:基于成像的研究","authors":"Prajna Pattanaik, Akilan Balasubramanian, P. Veeralakshmi, Gautam Singh, Vandana Sadananda, Hina Ahmed, J. Babu, C. Swarnalatha, A. Nayyar","doi":"10.4103/jmau.jmau_82_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of the present study was to assess the shaping ability of the recent, fifth-generation ProTaper Next and Revo-S NiTi rotary endodontic files using three-dimensional imaging.\n \n \n \n For the present in vitro study, 100 freshly extracted mandibular first molars indicated for extraction due to periodontal reasons were collected, while samples were cleaned and the angle of curvature was determined using Weine’s method. The access cavity was prepared using Endo Access Kit, while samples were divided into four groups to be prepared by ProTaper Next and Revo-S rotary endodontic files with or without using Glide path. The canal preparations were done in conjunction with Endo Prep RC, while the shaping ability of the instruments was assessed on the basis of canal transportation and canal-centering ability as assessed from pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before and after instrumentation. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Kruskal–Wallis H-test was used to compare canal transportation and canal-centering ability of the two file systems among different groups. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n \n \n \n Revo-S files when used with Glide path performed best at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth with zero apical transportation in case of both mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual canals. Furthermore, ProTaper Next files when used with or without Glide path showed higher canal-centering ability as compared to Revo-S files with the mean value being 0.83 ± 0.29 mm in either case when observed at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth in case of MB canals.\n \n \n \n Within the limitations of the present study, the findings obtained in the study suggested that ProTaper Next files had optimal canal-centering ability within the canal as compared to Revo-S files.\n","PeriodicalId":16340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of the Recent, Fifth-generation ProTaper Next and Revo-S NiTi Rotary Endodontic Files Using Three-dimensional Imaging: An Imaging-based Study\",\"authors\":\"Prajna Pattanaik, Akilan Balasubramanian, P. Veeralakshmi, Gautam Singh, Vandana Sadananda, Hina Ahmed, J. Babu, C. Swarnalatha, A. Nayyar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmau.jmau_82_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The aim of the present study was to assess the shaping ability of the recent, fifth-generation ProTaper Next and Revo-S NiTi rotary endodontic files using three-dimensional imaging.\\n \\n \\n \\n For the present in vitro study, 100 freshly extracted mandibular first molars indicated for extraction due to periodontal reasons were collected, while samples were cleaned and the angle of curvature was determined using Weine’s method. The access cavity was prepared using Endo Access Kit, while samples were divided into four groups to be prepared by ProTaper Next and Revo-S rotary endodontic files with or without using Glide path. The canal preparations were done in conjunction with Endo Prep RC, while the shaping ability of the instruments was assessed on the basis of canal transportation and canal-centering ability as assessed from pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before and after instrumentation. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Kruskal–Wallis H-test was used to compare canal transportation and canal-centering ability of the two file systems among different groups. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.\\n \\n \\n \\n Revo-S files when used with Glide path performed best at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth with zero apical transportation in case of both mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual canals. Furthermore, ProTaper Next files when used with or without Glide path showed higher canal-centering ability as compared to Revo-S files with the mean value being 0.83 ± 0.29 mm in either case when observed at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth in case of MB canals.\\n \\n \\n \\n Within the limitations of the present study, the findings obtained in the study suggested that ProTaper Next files had optimal canal-centering ability within the canal as compared to Revo-S files.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_82_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_82_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用三维成像技术评估最新的第五代 ProTaper Next 和 Revo-S NiTi 旋转根管针的塑形能力。 在本体外研究中,收集了 100 颗因牙周原因而需要拔除的新鲜下颌第一磨牙,对样本进行了清洁,并使用 Weine 方法确定了曲率角。使用 Endo 通路套件制备通路洞,并将样本分为四组,分别使用 ProTaper Next 和 Revo-S 旋转根管锉(使用或不使用 Glide 路径)进行制备。根管预备是与 Endo Prep RC 一起完成的,而器械的成型能力则是根据术前和术后采集的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像来评估的。统计分析采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16.0 版(SPSS Inc.)Kruskal-Wallis H 检验用于比较不同组间两种锉系统的管路运输和管路对中能力。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 Revo-S锉与Glide路径配合使用时,在距离牙齿根尖2毫米处表现最佳,在中颊面(MB)和中舌面牙管的情况下,根尖运输均为零。此外,与Revo-S锉相比,使用或不使用Glide路径的ProTaper Next锉显示出更高的管道对中能力,在距离牙齿根尖2毫米处观察MB管道时,两种情况下的平均值均为0.83 ± 0.29毫米。 在本研究的局限性范围内,研究结果表明,与Revo-S锉相比,ProTaper Next锉在牙道内具有最佳的牙道定心能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of the Recent, Fifth-generation ProTaper Next and Revo-S NiTi Rotary Endodontic Files Using Three-dimensional Imaging: An Imaging-based Study
The aim of the present study was to assess the shaping ability of the recent, fifth-generation ProTaper Next and Revo-S NiTi rotary endodontic files using three-dimensional imaging. For the present in vitro study, 100 freshly extracted mandibular first molars indicated for extraction due to periodontal reasons were collected, while samples were cleaned and the angle of curvature was determined using Weine’s method. The access cavity was prepared using Endo Access Kit, while samples were divided into four groups to be prepared by ProTaper Next and Revo-S rotary endodontic files with or without using Glide path. The canal preparations were done in conjunction with Endo Prep RC, while the shaping ability of the instruments was assessed on the basis of canal transportation and canal-centering ability as assessed from pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before and after instrumentation. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Kruskal–Wallis H-test was used to compare canal transportation and canal-centering ability of the two file systems among different groups. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Revo-S files when used with Glide path performed best at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth with zero apical transportation in case of both mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual canals. Furthermore, ProTaper Next files when used with or without Glide path showed higher canal-centering ability as compared to Revo-S files with the mean value being 0.83 ± 0.29 mm in either case when observed at 2 mm distance from the apical portion of teeth in case of MB canals. Within the limitations of the present study, the findings obtained in the study suggested that ProTaper Next files had optimal canal-centering ability within the canal as compared to Revo-S files.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信