设计跨部门合作，促进技术创新：五个国家电子保健伙伴关系的经验启示

IF 6.1 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1111/puar.13785

K. Verhoest, Chesney Callens, E. Klijn, Lena Brogaard, Jaime García‐Rayado, S. Nõmmik

{"title":"设计跨部门合作，促进技术创新：五个国家电子保健伙伴关系的经验启示","authors":"K. Verhoest, Chesney Callens, E. Klijn, Lena Brogaard, Jaime García‐Rayado, S. Nõmmik","doi":"10.1111/puar.13785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the impact of partnership design on technological innovation in public‐private innovation partnerships. It develops two competing hypotheses on how specific partnership characteristics lead to innovation in health care services. The study compares 19 eHealth partnerships across five European countries and uses fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis to test the hypotheses. The findings show that small, centralized, and homogeneous partnerships are most successful at achieving technological innovation. The study highlights the importance of partnership design in spurring innovation and calls for a reconsideration of some of the underlying assumptions of collaborative innovation theory.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"39 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing cross‐sector collaboration to foster technological innovation: Empirical insights from eHealth partnerships in five countries\",\"authors\":\"K. Verhoest, Chesney Callens, E. Klijn, Lena Brogaard, Jaime García‐Rayado, S. Nõmmik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/puar.13785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the impact of partnership design on technological innovation in public‐private innovation partnerships. It develops two competing hypotheses on how specific partnership characteristics lead to innovation in health care services. The study compares 19 eHealth partnerships across five European countries and uses fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis to test the hypotheses. The findings show that small, centralized, and homogeneous partnerships are most successful at achieving technological innovation. The study highlights the importance of partnership design in spurring innovation and calls for a reconsideration of some of the underlying assumptions of collaborative innovation theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"volume\":\"39 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13785\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了伙伴关系设计对公私创新伙伴关系中技术创新的影响。文章就特定合作关系特征如何导致医疗服务创新提出了两个相互竞争的假设。研究比较了五个欧洲国家的 19 个电子医疗合作伙伴关系，并使用模糊集定性比较分析来检验假设。研究结果表明，小型、集中和同质化的合作关系在实现技术创新方面最为成功。该研究强调了伙伴关系设计在促进创新方面的重要性，并呼吁重新考虑合作创新理论的一些基本假设。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Designing cross‐sector collaboration to foster technological innovation: Empirical insights from eHealth partnerships in five countries

This article examines the impact of partnership design on technological innovation in public‐private innovation partnerships. It develops two competing hypotheses on how specific partnership characteristics lead to innovation in health care services. The study compares 19 eHealth partnerships across five European countries and uses fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis to test the hypotheses. The findings show that small, centralized, and homogeneous partnerships are most successful at achieving technological innovation. The study highlights the importance of partnership design in spurring innovation and calls for a reconsideration of some of the underlying assumptions of collaborative innovation theory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

15.10

自引率

10.80%

发文量

130

期刊介绍： Public Administration Review (PAR), a bi-monthly professional journal, has held its position as the premier outlet for public administration research, theory, and practice for 75 years. Published for the American Society for Public Administration,TM/SM, it uniquely serves both academics and practitioners in the public sector. PAR features articles that identify and analyze current trends, offer a factual basis for decision-making, stimulate discussion, and present leading literature in an easily accessible format. Covering a diverse range of topics and featuring expert book reviews, PAR is both exciting to read and an indispensable resource in the field.