结合机载激光雷达采样方法和多传感器成像估算森林蓄积量

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Forests Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.3390/f14122453
Jianyang Liu, Ying Quan, Bin Wang, Jinan Shi, Lang Ming, Mingze Li
{"title":"结合机载激光雷达采样方法和多传感器成像估算森林蓄积量","authors":"Jianyang Liu, Ying Quan, Bin Wang, Jinan Shi, Lang Ming, Mingze Li","doi":"10.3390/f14122453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Timely and reliable estimation of forest stock volume is essential for sustainable forest management and conservation. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data can provide an effective depiction of the three-dimensional structure information of forests, but its large-scale application is hampered by spatial continuity. This study aims to construct a LiDAR sampling framework, combined with multi-sensor imagery, to estimate the regional forest stock volume of natural secondary forests in Northeast China. Two sampling approaches were compared, including systematic sampling and classification-based sampling. First, the forest stock volume was mapped using a combination of field measurement data and full-coverage LiDAR data. Then, the forest stock volume obtained in the first step of estimation was used as a reference value, and optical images and topographic features were combined for secondary modeling to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of different sampling methods, including 12 systematic sampling and classification-based sampling methods. Our results show that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the 12 systematic sampling approaches ranged from 55.81 to 57.42 m3/ha, and the BIAS ranged from 21.55 to 24.89 m3/ha. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach outperformed systematic sampling, with an RMSE of 55.56 (<55.81 m3/ha) and a BIAS of 20.68 (<21.55 m3/ha). This study compares different LiDAR sampling approaches and explores an effective LiDAR sample collection scheme for estimating forest stock, while balancing cost and accuracy. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach described in this study is easy to apply and portable and can provide a reference for future LiDAR sample collection.","PeriodicalId":12339,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Forest Stock Volume Combining Airborne LiDAR Sampling Approaches with Multi-Sensor Imagery\",\"authors\":\"Jianyang Liu, Ying Quan, Bin Wang, Jinan Shi, Lang Ming, Mingze Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/f14122453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Timely and reliable estimation of forest stock volume is essential for sustainable forest management and conservation. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data can provide an effective depiction of the three-dimensional structure information of forests, but its large-scale application is hampered by spatial continuity. This study aims to construct a LiDAR sampling framework, combined with multi-sensor imagery, to estimate the regional forest stock volume of natural secondary forests in Northeast China. Two sampling approaches were compared, including systematic sampling and classification-based sampling. First, the forest stock volume was mapped using a combination of field measurement data and full-coverage LiDAR data. Then, the forest stock volume obtained in the first step of estimation was used as a reference value, and optical images and topographic features were combined for secondary modeling to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of different sampling methods, including 12 systematic sampling and classification-based sampling methods. Our results show that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the 12 systematic sampling approaches ranged from 55.81 to 57.42 m3/ha, and the BIAS ranged from 21.55 to 24.89 m3/ha. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach outperformed systematic sampling, with an RMSE of 55.56 (<55.81 m3/ha) and a BIAS of 20.68 (<21.55 m3/ha). This study compares different LiDAR sampling approaches and explores an effective LiDAR sample collection scheme for estimating forest stock, while balancing cost and accuracy. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach described in this study is easy to apply and portable and can provide a reference for future LiDAR sample collection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

及时可靠地估算森林蓄积量对于可持续森林管理和保护至关重要。光探测与测距(LiDAR)数据可有效描述森林的三维结构信息,但其大规模应用受到空间连续性的阻碍。本研究旨在构建一个结合多传感器影像的激光雷达采样框架,以估算中国东北地区天然次生林的区域森林蓄积量。研究比较了两种采样方法,包括系统采样和基于分类的采样。首先,利用野外测量数据和全覆盖激光雷达数据绘制森林蓄积量图。然后,以第一步估算得到的森林蓄积量为参考值,结合光学图像和地形特征进行二次建模,比较不同采样方法的有效性和准确性,包括 12 种系统采样方法和基于分类的采样方法。结果表明,12 种系统取样方法的均方根误差(RMSE)在 55.81 至 57.42 立方米/公顷之间,BIAS 在 21.55 至 24.89 立方米/公顷之间。基于分类的激光雷达取样方法优于系统取样方法,其 RMSE 为 55.56(<55.81 立方米/公顷),BIAS 为 20.68(<21.55 立方米/公顷)。本研究比较了不同的激光雷达取样方法,并探索了一种有效的激光雷达样本采集方案,用于估算森林蓄积量,同时兼顾成本和精度。本研究中描述的基于分类的激光雷达采样方法易于应用和携带,可为未来的激光雷达样本采集提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of Forest Stock Volume Combining Airborne LiDAR Sampling Approaches with Multi-Sensor Imagery
Timely and reliable estimation of forest stock volume is essential for sustainable forest management and conservation. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data can provide an effective depiction of the three-dimensional structure information of forests, but its large-scale application is hampered by spatial continuity. This study aims to construct a LiDAR sampling framework, combined with multi-sensor imagery, to estimate the regional forest stock volume of natural secondary forests in Northeast China. Two sampling approaches were compared, including systematic sampling and classification-based sampling. First, the forest stock volume was mapped using a combination of field measurement data and full-coverage LiDAR data. Then, the forest stock volume obtained in the first step of estimation was used as a reference value, and optical images and topographic features were combined for secondary modeling to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of different sampling methods, including 12 systematic sampling and classification-based sampling methods. Our results show that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the 12 systematic sampling approaches ranged from 55.81 to 57.42 m3/ha, and the BIAS ranged from 21.55 to 24.89 m3/ha. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach outperformed systematic sampling, with an RMSE of 55.56 (<55.81 m3/ha) and a BIAS of 20.68 (<21.55 m3/ha). This study compares different LiDAR sampling approaches and explores an effective LiDAR sample collection scheme for estimating forest stock, while balancing cost and accuracy. The classification-based LiDAR sampling approach described in this study is easy to apply and portable and can provide a reference for future LiDAR sample collection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests
Forests FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
1823
审稿时长
19.02 days
期刊介绍: Forests (ISSN 1999-4907) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly journal of forestry and forest ecology. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信