SYNTAX 评分对冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期疗效的影响:系统回顾

Faiq Murteza, Chabib Fachry Albab, Almas Talida Habibah, Achmad Fayyad Mas’udi, Vemaniarti Lian Pravitasari, Arya Satya Rajanagara, Zaha El-Ma’i
{"title":"SYNTAX 评分对冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期疗效的影响:系统回顾","authors":"Faiq Murteza, Chabib Fachry Albab, Almas Talida Habibah, Achmad Fayyad Mas’udi, Vemaniarti Lian Pravitasari, Arya Satya Rajanagara, Zaha El-Ma’i","doi":"10.20473/fmi.v59i4.46514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SYNTAX  score was designed to predict the postprocedural risk associated with PCI or surgical revascularization. This study aims to evaluate long term (>5 years) outcome of PCI with CABG by comparing several existing studies. A systematic search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. This systematic review used all studies in the field of differences in outcome of PCI and CABG intervention in left main coronary artery stenosis. This study used cross sectional study design with a systematic review method based on several cohort studies. The search was conducted until February 10th, 2023. Assessment of the study quality was carried out using the criteria of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Based on the final assessment, all included studies had a mean NOS score of 8 which could be interpreted as excellent quality. Our search yielded 1675 studies of which we included 5 studies for the final analysis. A total of 5.494 patients were treated with PCI and CABG. In this study, there were differences outcome in low, medium and high syntax scores on long term major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and long term mortality. However, the similar outcome was obtained in long term revascularization, long term stroke and long term Miokard Infark (MI). Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis patients with low to high SS may result various long-term outcomes. CABG is associated with lower incidence of mortality, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and MACCE than PCI. Meanwhile, PCI gives lower incidence of stroke.","PeriodicalId":32666,"journal":{"name":"Folia Medica Indonesiana","volume":"1123 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of SYNTAX Score with Longterm Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Faiq Murteza, Chabib Fachry Albab, Almas Talida Habibah, Achmad Fayyad Mas’udi, Vemaniarti Lian Pravitasari, Arya Satya Rajanagara, Zaha El-Ma’i\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/fmi.v59i4.46514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The SYNTAX  score was designed to predict the postprocedural risk associated with PCI or surgical revascularization. This study aims to evaluate long term (>5 years) outcome of PCI with CABG by comparing several existing studies. A systematic search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. This systematic review used all studies in the field of differences in outcome of PCI and CABG intervention in left main coronary artery stenosis. This study used cross sectional study design with a systematic review method based on several cohort studies. The search was conducted until February 10th, 2023. Assessment of the study quality was carried out using the criteria of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Based on the final assessment, all included studies had a mean NOS score of 8 which could be interpreted as excellent quality. Our search yielded 1675 studies of which we included 5 studies for the final analysis. A total of 5.494 patients were treated with PCI and CABG. In this study, there were differences outcome in low, medium and high syntax scores on long term major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and long term mortality. However, the similar outcome was obtained in long term revascularization, long term stroke and long term Miokard Infark (MI). Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis patients with low to high SS may result various long-term outcomes. CABG is associated with lower incidence of mortality, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and MACCE than PCI. Meanwhile, PCI gives lower incidence of stroke.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Medica Indonesiana\",\"volume\":\"1123 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Medica Indonesiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v59i4.46514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Medica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v59i4.46514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SYNTAX 评分旨在预测与 PCI 或手术血运重建相关的术后风险。本研究旨在通过比较现有的几项研究,评估 PCI 与 CABG 的长期(>5 年)疗效。我们通过 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 ScienceDirect 数据库进行了系统性检索。本系统性综述使用了所有关于冠状动脉左主干狭窄患者 PCI 和 CABG 干预治疗效果差异的研究。本研究采用了横断面研究设计,并在多项队列研究的基础上采用了系统综述方法。检索截止到 2023 年 2 月 10 日。研究质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)标准。根据最终评估结果,所有纳入研究的平均 NOS 得分为 8 分,可被视为质量优异。我们共搜索到 1675 项研究,其中有 5 项研究被纳入最终分析。共有 5.494 名患者接受了 PCI 和 CABG 治疗。在这项研究中,低、中、高综合评分在长期主要心脏或脑血管不良事件(MACCE)和长期死亡率方面的结果存在差异。但在长期血管重建、长期中风和长期Miokard Infark(MI)方面,结果相似。左冠状动脉主干(LMCA)狭窄患者的 SS 从低到高,可能会导致不同的长期结果。与 PCI 相比,CABG 的死亡率、重复血管重建、心肌梗死和 MACCE 的发生率更低。同时,PCI 的中风发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of SYNTAX Score with Longterm Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review
The SYNTAX  score was designed to predict the postprocedural risk associated with PCI or surgical revascularization. This study aims to evaluate long term (>5 years) outcome of PCI with CABG by comparing several existing studies. A systematic search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. This systematic review used all studies in the field of differences in outcome of PCI and CABG intervention in left main coronary artery stenosis. This study used cross sectional study design with a systematic review method based on several cohort studies. The search was conducted until February 10th, 2023. Assessment of the study quality was carried out using the criteria of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Based on the final assessment, all included studies had a mean NOS score of 8 which could be interpreted as excellent quality. Our search yielded 1675 studies of which we included 5 studies for the final analysis. A total of 5.494 patients were treated with PCI and CABG. In this study, there were differences outcome in low, medium and high syntax scores on long term major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and long term mortality. However, the similar outcome was obtained in long term revascularization, long term stroke and long term Miokard Infark (MI). Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis patients with low to high SS may result various long-term outcomes. CABG is associated with lower incidence of mortality, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and MACCE than PCI. Meanwhile, PCI gives lower incidence of stroke.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信