{"title":"使用在线工具帮助学生提高英语作为外语写作的词汇范围","authors":"Bao Trang Thi Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/00336882231217528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different automated writing evaluation tools have been applied in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL)/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) writing instruction to facilitate feedback giving and enhance writing quality. Yet they fail to provide needs-driven focused feedback that takes account of learner differences and that drives learning. In the Vietnamese tertiary context where I taught the EFL writing course for the present innovation, vocabulary was underscored as one of the key dimensions to be assessed in students’ EFL writing performance. However, many students were not certain about what they could practically do to elevate lexical range in their EFL writing. They tended to use overtly easy words or else they repeated words that have been used to a large extent. This classroom innovation responded to these lexical problems and the recent calls for the instructional pedagogies to provide needs-driven feedback that empowers learners to explore and edit their writing by themselves. It guided students to expand their lexical range in EFL writing through use of online dictionaries and Text Analyzer, a free online tool to find the Common European Framework of Reference level of their written text. The innovation afforded the students the autonomy to explore, reflect on their lexical use and make informed changes about it. The pedagogical values of the innovation were reported from students’ perspectives and my experience as their class teacher. In light of these benefits, future pedagogical directions for upgrading lexical use in EFL writing are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":"665 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Online Tools to Help Students Elevate Lexical Range in English-as-a-Foreign-Language Writing\",\"authors\":\"Bao Trang Thi Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00336882231217528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different automated writing evaluation tools have been applied in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL)/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) writing instruction to facilitate feedback giving and enhance writing quality. Yet they fail to provide needs-driven focused feedback that takes account of learner differences and that drives learning. In the Vietnamese tertiary context where I taught the EFL writing course for the present innovation, vocabulary was underscored as one of the key dimensions to be assessed in students’ EFL writing performance. However, many students were not certain about what they could practically do to elevate lexical range in their EFL writing. They tended to use overtly easy words or else they repeated words that have been used to a large extent. This classroom innovation responded to these lexical problems and the recent calls for the instructional pedagogies to provide needs-driven feedback that empowers learners to explore and edit their writing by themselves. It guided students to expand their lexical range in EFL writing through use of online dictionaries and Text Analyzer, a free online tool to find the Common European Framework of Reference level of their written text. The innovation afforded the students the autonomy to explore, reflect on their lexical use and make informed changes about it. The pedagogical values of the innovation were reported from students’ perspectives and my experience as their class teacher. In light of these benefits, future pedagogical directions for upgrading lexical use in EFL writing are further discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Relc Journal\",\"volume\":\"665 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Relc Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231217528\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231217528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Online Tools to Help Students Elevate Lexical Range in English-as-a-Foreign-Language Writing
Different automated writing evaluation tools have been applied in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL)/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) writing instruction to facilitate feedback giving and enhance writing quality. Yet they fail to provide needs-driven focused feedback that takes account of learner differences and that drives learning. In the Vietnamese tertiary context where I taught the EFL writing course for the present innovation, vocabulary was underscored as one of the key dimensions to be assessed in students’ EFL writing performance. However, many students were not certain about what they could practically do to elevate lexical range in their EFL writing. They tended to use overtly easy words or else they repeated words that have been used to a large extent. This classroom innovation responded to these lexical problems and the recent calls for the instructional pedagogies to provide needs-driven feedback that empowers learners to explore and edit their writing by themselves. It guided students to expand their lexical range in EFL writing through use of online dictionaries and Text Analyzer, a free online tool to find the Common European Framework of Reference level of their written text. The innovation afforded the students the autonomy to explore, reflect on their lexical use and make informed changes about it. The pedagogical values of the innovation were reported from students’ perspectives and my experience as their class teacher. In light of these benefits, future pedagogical directions for upgrading lexical use in EFL writing are further discussed.
期刊介绍:
The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.