在强制养老保险领域保护被侵犯权利时适用关于损失赔偿和不当得利的民法准则

Natalya V. Roshchepko
{"title":"在强制养老保险领域保护被侵犯权利时适用关于损失赔偿和不当得利的民法准则","authors":"Natalya V. Roshchepko","doi":"10.18255/1996-5648-2023-4-562-571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problems of protecting the rights of subjects of compulsory pension insurance. The grounds and procedure for compensation by the policyholder, as well as by the insured person (pensioner) for the amounts of real damage caused to the bodies of the Social Fund of the Russian Federation, in the form of overpaid insurance coverage, are analyzed. The relevance of the provisions of Chapter 60 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on unjust enrichment when resolving such disputes by courts is also noted, which is permissible due to the direct instructions of the law on insurance pensions. Unlike the insurer, the right of the insured person (pensioner) to compensation for losses is not legally established. However, the provisions of Article 15, Art. 393 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are in demand when collecting the amounts of an unassigned (unreceived) old-age insurance pension as lost profits from the policyholder or insurer. The need to apply civil legislation is due to the specific nature of the declarative nature of the right to old-age insurance. At the same time, this places the burden on the plaintiff to prove the completeness of the grounds for implementing this measure of legal liability, which reduces the effectiveness of the protection of pension rights. The article formulates proposals for improving the legal regulation of the purpose of insurance coverage for compulsory pension insurance.","PeriodicalId":396792,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki","volume":"1994 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of civil law norms on compensation for losses and unjust enrichment in the protection of violated rights in the field of compulsory pension insurance\",\"authors\":\"Natalya V. Roshchepko\",\"doi\":\"10.18255/1996-5648-2023-4-562-571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the problems of protecting the rights of subjects of compulsory pension insurance. The grounds and procedure for compensation by the policyholder, as well as by the insured person (pensioner) for the amounts of real damage caused to the bodies of the Social Fund of the Russian Federation, in the form of overpaid insurance coverage, are analyzed. The relevance of the provisions of Chapter 60 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on unjust enrichment when resolving such disputes by courts is also noted, which is permissible due to the direct instructions of the law on insurance pensions. Unlike the insurer, the right of the insured person (pensioner) to compensation for losses is not legally established. However, the provisions of Article 15, Art. 393 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are in demand when collecting the amounts of an unassigned (unreceived) old-age insurance pension as lost profits from the policyholder or insurer. The need to apply civil legislation is due to the specific nature of the declarative nature of the right to old-age insurance. At the same time, this places the burden on the plaintiff to prove the completeness of the grounds for implementing this measure of legal liability, which reduces the effectiveness of the protection of pension rights. The article formulates proposals for improving the legal regulation of the purpose of insurance coverage for compulsory pension insurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki\",\"volume\":\"1994 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18255/1996-5648-2023-4-562-571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova. Seriya gumanitarnye nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18255/1996-5648-2023-4-562-571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本条专门论述保护强制性养老保险主体权利的问题。文章分析了投保人和被保险人(养老金领取者)以多付保险金的形式对俄罗斯联邦社会基金机 构造成的实际损失进行赔偿的理由和程序。同时还指出了《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第 60 章中关于法院解决此类纠纷时不当得利条款的相关性,由于保险养老金法的直接指示,该条款是允许的。与保险人不同,被保险人(养老金领取者)获得损失赔偿的权利并未在法律上得到确立。然而,《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第 15 条和第 393 条的规定却规定了这一权利。然而,在向投保人或保险人收取未分配(未领取)的养老保险金金额作为利润损失时,需要适用《俄 罗斯联邦民法典》第 15 条第 393 款的规定。之所以需要适用民事法律,是因为养老保险权利的声明性质具有特殊性。同时,这也使原告承担了证明实施这一法律责任措施的理由完整性的责任,从而降低了养老金权利保护的有效性。文章提出了完善强制养老保险投保目的法律规定的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of civil law norms on compensation for losses and unjust enrichment in the protection of violated rights in the field of compulsory pension insurance
The article is devoted to the problems of protecting the rights of subjects of compulsory pension insurance. The grounds and procedure for compensation by the policyholder, as well as by the insured person (pensioner) for the amounts of real damage caused to the bodies of the Social Fund of the Russian Federation, in the form of overpaid insurance coverage, are analyzed. The relevance of the provisions of Chapter 60 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on unjust enrichment when resolving such disputes by courts is also noted, which is permissible due to the direct instructions of the law on insurance pensions. Unlike the insurer, the right of the insured person (pensioner) to compensation for losses is not legally established. However, the provisions of Article 15, Art. 393 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are in demand when collecting the amounts of an unassigned (unreceived) old-age insurance pension as lost profits from the policyholder or insurer. The need to apply civil legislation is due to the specific nature of the declarative nature of the right to old-age insurance. At the same time, this places the burden on the plaintiff to prove the completeness of the grounds for implementing this measure of legal liability, which reduces the effectiveness of the protection of pension rights. The article formulates proposals for improving the legal regulation of the purpose of insurance coverage for compulsory pension insurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信