大学牙髓病学专业与私人牙髓病学诊室垂直根折的发生率对比

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Berit Ek, S. Zweig, Ramon G. Roges, Yaara Berdan, Rafael Roges, A. Abulhamael, Abrar Kutbi, A. Alqutub, Osama S. Alothmani, Amna Y. Siddiqui
{"title":"大学牙髓病学专业与私人牙髓病学诊室垂直根折的发生率对比","authors":"Berit Ek, S. Zweig, Ramon G. Roges, Yaara Berdan, Rafael Roges, A. Abulhamael, Abrar Kutbi, A. Alqutub, Osama S. Alothmani, Amna Y. Siddiqui","doi":"10.1155/2023/2098629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Vertical root fractures (VRFs) typically have a poor prognosis with an extraction or occasionally root amputation as the preferred treatment. VRFs have been considered an epidemic, motivating changes in the access openings, as well as in the preparation and disinfection protocols of endodontic treatment. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of VRFs by tracking cases in both a University Endodontic Program (UEP) and a private endodontics practice (PP). We also evaluated changes in prevalence during COVID-19 along with the alterations in the frequency of cases diagnosed by clinical and radiographic signs which were later confirmed by direct visualization compared to those in which the suspicion was based on clinical and radiographic signs alone. Methods and Materials. This retrospective study looked at the prevalence of VRF in patient records at UEP and a PP. Data for the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods were extracted from patient records and referral letters then compared. Data for suspected and confirmed prevalence were compared. Results. The UEP group included 21,156 patients while the PP group comprised 7,209 patients. The prevalence of VRFs in the former cohort was 1.80%, while 2.62% of the latter cohort exhibited VRFs with a combined total of 2.01%. The combined total prevalence of VRFs pre-COVID-19 was 1.72%, increasing from 2.1% to 3.82% during COVID-19 (\n \n p\n <\n 0.0001\n \n ). The same applied to suspected cases for both clinical settings. The increase in confirmed cases between the two periods was statistically significant for the UEP group (\n \n p\n =\n 0.0202\n \n ) but it was insignificant for the PP group (\n \n p\n =\n 0.0721\n \n ). Conclusion. The combined prevalence for VRFs was 2.01% for all years denying the claim that VRF is a pandemic phenomenon. COVID-19 period saw almost a double increase in the prevalence of VRF compared to pre-COVID-19 era. This was consequently associated with a significant increase in the number of suspected VRF cases.","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":" March","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Vertical Root Fractures in a University Endodontics Program versus a Private Endodontics Office\",\"authors\":\"Berit Ek, S. Zweig, Ramon G. Roges, Yaara Berdan, Rafael Roges, A. Abulhamael, Abrar Kutbi, A. Alqutub, Osama S. Alothmani, Amna Y. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2098629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Vertical root fractures (VRFs) typically have a poor prognosis with an extraction or occasionally root amputation as the preferred treatment. VRFs have been considered an epidemic, motivating changes in the access openings, as well as in the preparation and disinfection protocols of endodontic treatment. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of VRFs by tracking cases in both a University Endodontic Program (UEP) and a private endodontics practice (PP). We also evaluated changes in prevalence during COVID-19 along with the alterations in the frequency of cases diagnosed by clinical and radiographic signs which were later confirmed by direct visualization compared to those in which the suspicion was based on clinical and radiographic signs alone. Methods and Materials. This retrospective study looked at the prevalence of VRF in patient records at UEP and a PP. Data for the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods were extracted from patient records and referral letters then compared. Data for suspected and confirmed prevalence were compared. Results. The UEP group included 21,156 patients while the PP group comprised 7,209 patients. The prevalence of VRFs in the former cohort was 1.80%, while 2.62% of the latter cohort exhibited VRFs with a combined total of 2.01%. The combined total prevalence of VRFs pre-COVID-19 was 1.72%, increasing from 2.1% to 3.82% during COVID-19 (\\n \\n p\\n <\\n 0.0001\\n \\n ). The same applied to suspected cases for both clinical settings. The increase in confirmed cases between the two periods was statistically significant for the UEP group (\\n \\n p\\n =\\n 0.0202\\n \\n ) but it was insignificant for the PP group (\\n \\n p\\n =\\n 0.0721\\n \\n ). Conclusion. The combined prevalence for VRFs was 2.01% for all years denying the claim that VRF is a pandemic phenomenon. COVID-19 period saw almost a double increase in the prevalence of VRF compared to pre-COVID-19 era. This was consequently associated with a significant increase in the number of suspected VRF cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" March\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2098629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2098629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介垂直根折(VRFs)的预后通常较差,首选治疗方法是拔牙或偶尔截根。垂直根折一直被认为是一种流行病,促使人们改变牙髓治疗的通路以及准备和消毒方案。因此,我们旨在通过跟踪大学牙髓治疗项目(UEP)和私人牙髓治疗诊所(PP)的病例来评估 VRFs 的流行情况。我们还评估了 COVID-19 期间流行率的变化,以及与仅根据临床和影像学体征进行怀疑的病例相比,通过临床和影像学体征诊断并随后通过直接观察确认的病例频率的变化。方法和材料。这项回顾性研究调查了 UEP 和一家 PP 病历中 VRF 的发病率。研究人员从患者病历和转诊信中提取了 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 期间的数据,然后进行了比较。对疑似患病率和确诊患病率的数据进行比较。结果。UEP 组包括 21,156 名患者,而 PP 组包括 7,209 名患者。前者的 VRF 患病率为 1.80%,后者的 VRF 患病率为 2.62%,总患病率为 2.01%。在 COVID-19 之前,VRFs 的总患病率为 1.72%,而在 COVID-19 期间,患病率从 2.1%增至 3.82%(P < 0.0001)。两种临床环境中的疑似病例也是如此。在这两个时期,UEP 组确诊病例的增加具有显著的统计学意义 ( p = 0.0202 ),但 PP 组的增加并不显著 ( p = 0.0721 )。结论在所有年份中,VRF 的综合流行率为 2.01%,否认了 VRF 是一种流行现象的说法。与 COVID-19 之前相比,COVID-19 期间的 VRF 患病率几乎增加了一倍。因此,疑似 VRF 病例的数量也随之大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Vertical Root Fractures in a University Endodontics Program versus a Private Endodontics Office
Introduction. Vertical root fractures (VRFs) typically have a poor prognosis with an extraction or occasionally root amputation as the preferred treatment. VRFs have been considered an epidemic, motivating changes in the access openings, as well as in the preparation and disinfection protocols of endodontic treatment. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of VRFs by tracking cases in both a University Endodontic Program (UEP) and a private endodontics practice (PP). We also evaluated changes in prevalence during COVID-19 along with the alterations in the frequency of cases diagnosed by clinical and radiographic signs which were later confirmed by direct visualization compared to those in which the suspicion was based on clinical and radiographic signs alone. Methods and Materials. This retrospective study looked at the prevalence of VRF in patient records at UEP and a PP. Data for the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods were extracted from patient records and referral letters then compared. Data for suspected and confirmed prevalence were compared. Results. The UEP group included 21,156 patients while the PP group comprised 7,209 patients. The prevalence of VRFs in the former cohort was 1.80%, while 2.62% of the latter cohort exhibited VRFs with a combined total of 2.01%. The combined total prevalence of VRFs pre-COVID-19 was 1.72%, increasing from 2.1% to 3.82% during COVID-19 ( p < 0.0001 ). The same applied to suspected cases for both clinical settings. The increase in confirmed cases between the two periods was statistically significant for the UEP group ( p = 0.0202 ) but it was insignificant for the PP group ( p = 0.0721 ). Conclusion. The combined prevalence for VRFs was 2.01% for all years denying the claim that VRF is a pandemic phenomenon. COVID-19 period saw almost a double increase in the prevalence of VRF compared to pre-COVID-19 era. This was consequently associated with a significant increase in the number of suspected VRF cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信