在实验中对兔子腹侧和背侧挫伤脊髓损伤模型进行比较评估

Q4 Medicine
A. S. Shabunin, Margarita V. Savina, Timofey S. Rybinskikh, Anna D. Dreval, Vladislav D. Safarov, Platon А. Safonov, Andrej M. Fedyuk, D. Sitovskaia, Nikita M. Dyachuk, Alexandra S. Baidikova, Lidia S. Konkova, Olga L. Vlasova, S. Vissarionov
{"title":"在实验中对兔子腹侧和背侧挫伤脊髓损伤模型进行比较评估","authors":"A. S. Shabunin, Margarita V. Savina, Timofey S. Rybinskikh, Anna D. Dreval, Vladislav D. Safarov, Platon А. Safonov, Andrej M. Fedyuk, D. Sitovskaia, Nikita M. Dyachuk, Alexandra S. Baidikova, Lidia S. Konkova, Olga L. Vlasova, S. Vissarionov","doi":"10.17816/ptors568295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Contemporary experimental models for spinal cord injury studies are mainly based on spinal cord injury in rats and mice. Modeling of experimental spinal cord injuries is generally performed from the dorsal approach, which excludes its injury as a result of compression by the fragments of the fractured vertebral body and significantly restricts the application of the results obtained from clinical practice. \nAIM: To develop and create contusional spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach with its subsequent comparison with the contusional spinal cord injury model from the dorsal approach. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study examined 20 female Soviet Chinchilla rabbits weighing 3.5–4.5 kg. The rabbits were subjected to standardized spinal cord injuries from the ventral and dorsal approaches at the LII level. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials, H-reflex, were recorded in all experimental animals before injury, immediately after, and 3 and 8 h after injury. Histological studies were also performed using qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of biopsy samples of damaged areas and assessing the number of dystrophic neurons over time. The results of neurophysiological and histological examinations of the spinal cord in cases of ventral and dorsal trauma were statistically processed. \nRESULTS: When modeling spinal cord injury from the ventral approach, in comparison with the model from the dorsal approach, more significant damage is detected. As a result of the injury factor, the dysfunction of both neurons at the traumatization level and peripheral neurons below the injury zone was revealed; however, as histological examinations have shown, in contrast to the dorsal approach, mild hemorrhage was observed in the ventral approach. \nCONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate a more significant and strict contusion mechanism of the spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach and the maximum proximity of the resulting model in a clinical situation. In the future, the experimental model of the contusional spinal cord injury in a laboratory animal can be used in chronic experiments.","PeriodicalId":37631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" 1010","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of contusion spinal cord injury models from ventral and dorsal approaches in rabbits in an experiment\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Shabunin, Margarita V. Savina, Timofey S. Rybinskikh, Anna D. Dreval, Vladislav D. Safarov, Platon А. Safonov, Andrej M. Fedyuk, D. Sitovskaia, Nikita M. Dyachuk, Alexandra S. Baidikova, Lidia S. Konkova, Olga L. Vlasova, S. Vissarionov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/ptors568295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Contemporary experimental models for spinal cord injury studies are mainly based on spinal cord injury in rats and mice. Modeling of experimental spinal cord injuries is generally performed from the dorsal approach, which excludes its injury as a result of compression by the fragments of the fractured vertebral body and significantly restricts the application of the results obtained from clinical practice. \\nAIM: To develop and create contusional spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach with its subsequent comparison with the contusional spinal cord injury model from the dorsal approach. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study examined 20 female Soviet Chinchilla rabbits weighing 3.5–4.5 kg. The rabbits were subjected to standardized spinal cord injuries from the ventral and dorsal approaches at the LII level. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials, H-reflex, were recorded in all experimental animals before injury, immediately after, and 3 and 8 h after injury. Histological studies were also performed using qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of biopsy samples of damaged areas and assessing the number of dystrophic neurons over time. The results of neurophysiological and histological examinations of the spinal cord in cases of ventral and dorsal trauma were statistically processed. \\nRESULTS: When modeling spinal cord injury from the ventral approach, in comparison with the model from the dorsal approach, more significant damage is detected. As a result of the injury factor, the dysfunction of both neurons at the traumatization level and peripheral neurons below the injury zone was revealed; however, as histological examinations have shown, in contrast to the dorsal approach, mild hemorrhage was observed in the ventral approach. \\nCONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate a more significant and strict contusion mechanism of the spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach and the maximum proximity of the resulting model in a clinical situation. In the future, the experimental model of the contusional spinal cord injury in a laboratory animal can be used in chronic experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\" 1010\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/ptors568295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ptors568295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当代脊髓损伤研究的实验模型主要基于大鼠和小鼠的脊髓损伤。实验性脊髓损伤模型一般从背侧入路进行,这就排除了脊髓损伤是由骨折椎体碎片压迫造成的,大大限制了临床实践结果的应用。目的:建立腹侧入路脊髓挫伤模型,并与背侧入路脊髓挫伤模型进行比较。材料与方法:研究对象为 20 只体重为 3.5-4.5 千克的雌性苏联栗鼠。这些兔子的 LII 水平分别受到腹侧和背侧的标准化脊髓损伤。所有实验动物在受伤前、受伤后立即以及受伤后 3 和 8 小时内均记录了躯体感觉和运动诱发电位以及 H 反射。此外,还对受损区域的活检样本进行了定性和半定量分析,并评估了随着时间推移萎缩神经元的数量。对脊髓腹侧和背侧创伤的神经电生理和组织学检查结果进行了统计学处理。结果:在建立腹侧脊髓损伤模型时,与背侧脊髓损伤模型相比,脊髓损伤更为严重。由于损伤因素,创伤水平的神经元和损伤区以下的外周神经元都出现了功能障碍;然而,组织学检查显示,与背侧入路相比,腹侧入路观察到轻度出血。结论:研究结果表明,腹侧入路脊髓损伤模型的挫伤机制更明显、更严格,所产生的模型也更接近临床情况。今后,实验动物脊髓挫伤实验模型可用于慢性实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of contusion spinal cord injury models from ventral and dorsal approaches in rabbits in an experiment
BACKGROUND: Contemporary experimental models for spinal cord injury studies are mainly based on spinal cord injury in rats and mice. Modeling of experimental spinal cord injuries is generally performed from the dorsal approach, which excludes its injury as a result of compression by the fragments of the fractured vertebral body and significantly restricts the application of the results obtained from clinical practice. AIM: To develop and create contusional spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach with its subsequent comparison with the contusional spinal cord injury model from the dorsal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study examined 20 female Soviet Chinchilla rabbits weighing 3.5–4.5 kg. The rabbits were subjected to standardized spinal cord injuries from the ventral and dorsal approaches at the LII level. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials, H-reflex, were recorded in all experimental animals before injury, immediately after, and 3 and 8 h after injury. Histological studies were also performed using qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of biopsy samples of damaged areas and assessing the number of dystrophic neurons over time. The results of neurophysiological and histological examinations of the spinal cord in cases of ventral and dorsal trauma were statistically processed. RESULTS: When modeling spinal cord injury from the ventral approach, in comparison with the model from the dorsal approach, more significant damage is detected. As a result of the injury factor, the dysfunction of both neurons at the traumatization level and peripheral neurons below the injury zone was revealed; however, as histological examinations have shown, in contrast to the dorsal approach, mild hemorrhage was observed in the ventral approach. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate a more significant and strict contusion mechanism of the spinal cord injury model from the ventral approach and the maximum proximity of the resulting model in a clinical situation. In the future, the experimental model of the contusional spinal cord injury in a laboratory animal can be used in chronic experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The target audience of the journal is researches, physicians, orthopedic trauma, burn, and pediatric surgeons, anesthesiologists, pediatricians, neurologists, oral surgeons, and all specialists in related fields of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信