古典阿拉伯语与现代阿拉伯语中的请求结构:基于语料库的研究

Q1 Social Sciences
N. Abbas, Tabarek Ali Qasim, Haya Abdul-Salam Jasim
{"title":"古典阿拉伯语与现代阿拉伯语中的请求结构:基于语料库的研究","authors":"N. Abbas, Tabarek Ali Qasim, Haya Abdul-Salam Jasim","doi":"10.29333/ejecs/1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to investigate the various request constructions used in Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic language by identifying the differences in their usage in these two different genres. Also, the study attempts to trace the cases of felicitous and infelicitous requests in the Arabic language. Methodologically, the current study employs a web-based corpus tool (Sketch Engine) to analyze different corpora: the first one is Classical Arabic, represented by King Saud University Corpus of Classical Arabic, while the second is The Arabic Web Corpus “arTenTen” representing Modern Arabic. To do so, the study relies on felicity conditions to qualitatively interpret the quantitative data, i.e., following a mixed mode method. The findings of the present study show that request constructions vary in terms of occurrence between Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic. In Classical Arabic, (/laa/ لا) of prohibition is the most frequent construction, which is rarely used in the Web corpus where the command in the form of (/lam/لام + verb) is the most commonly emerging one, which is, in turn, seldom employed in the former corpus. The vocative (/ya/ يا) is the second most frequent construction in Classical Arabic, whilst the interrogative (/hel/ هل) emerged in the other genre. The third most common request construction is the interrogative (/hel/ هل) in Classical Arabic, but the vocative (/ya/ يا) is used in Modern Arabic. Nonetheless, some of these constructions fail to accomplish two or more conditions and hence are regarded as infelicitous requests. Such infelicitous constructions serve other functions than requests, such as negation, exclamation, and sarcasm.","PeriodicalId":37174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","volume":" 1215","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Request Constructions in Classical Arabic versus Modern Arabic: A Corpus-based Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Abbas, Tabarek Ali Qasim, Haya Abdul-Salam Jasim\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/ejecs/1598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aims to investigate the various request constructions used in Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic language by identifying the differences in their usage in these two different genres. Also, the study attempts to trace the cases of felicitous and infelicitous requests in the Arabic language. Methodologically, the current study employs a web-based corpus tool (Sketch Engine) to analyze different corpora: the first one is Classical Arabic, represented by King Saud University Corpus of Classical Arabic, while the second is The Arabic Web Corpus “arTenTen” representing Modern Arabic. To do so, the study relies on felicity conditions to qualitatively interpret the quantitative data, i.e., following a mixed mode method. The findings of the present study show that request constructions vary in terms of occurrence between Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic. In Classical Arabic, (/laa/ لا) of prohibition is the most frequent construction, which is rarely used in the Web corpus where the command in the form of (/lam/لام + verb) is the most commonly emerging one, which is, in turn, seldom employed in the former corpus. The vocative (/ya/ يا) is the second most frequent construction in Classical Arabic, whilst the interrogative (/hel/ هل) emerged in the other genre. The third most common request construction is the interrogative (/hel/ هل) in Classical Arabic, but the vocative (/ya/ يا) is used in Modern Arabic. Nonetheless, some of these constructions fail to accomplish two or more conditions and hence are regarded as infelicitous requests. Such infelicitous constructions serve other functions than requests, such as negation, exclamation, and sarcasm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\" 1215\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查古典阿拉伯语和现代阿拉伯语中使用的各种请求结构,找出它们在这两种不同体裁中的用法差异。此外,本研究还试图追踪阿拉伯语中的 "有效请求 "和 "无效请求 "的情况。在研究方法上,本研究采用了基于网络的语料库工具(Sketch Engine)来分析不同的语料库:第一个是以沙特国王大学古典阿拉伯语语料库为代表的古典阿拉伯语语料库,第二个是以阿拉伯语网络语料库 "arTenTen "为代表的现代阿拉伯语语料库。为此,本研究采用了混合模式法,即依靠 "美妙性 "条件对定量数据进行定性阐释。本研究的结果表明,请求结构在古典阿拉伯语和现代阿拉伯语中的出现率有所不同。在古典阿拉伯语中,禁止语(/laa/ لا)是出现频率最高的结构,但在网络语料库中却很少使用;在网络语料库中,命令语(/lam/لام + 动词)是出现频率最高的结构,但在古典阿拉伯语语料库中却很少使用。呼词(/ya/ يا)是古典阿拉伯语中第二常见的结构,而疑问句(/hel/ هل)则出现在其他体裁中。在古典阿拉伯语中,第三种最常见的请求结构是疑问句(/hel/ هل),但在现代阿拉伯语中使用的是祈使句(/ya/ يا)。尽管如此,这些结构中仍有一些不能满足两个或两个以上的条件,因此被认为是无效请求。除了请求之外,这些非谓语结构还具有其他功能,如否定、感叹和讽刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Request Constructions in Classical Arabic versus Modern Arabic: A Corpus-based Study
The present study aims to investigate the various request constructions used in Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic language by identifying the differences in their usage in these two different genres. Also, the study attempts to trace the cases of felicitous and infelicitous requests in the Arabic language. Methodologically, the current study employs a web-based corpus tool (Sketch Engine) to analyze different corpora: the first one is Classical Arabic, represented by King Saud University Corpus of Classical Arabic, while the second is The Arabic Web Corpus “arTenTen” representing Modern Arabic. To do so, the study relies on felicity conditions to qualitatively interpret the quantitative data, i.e., following a mixed mode method. The findings of the present study show that request constructions vary in terms of occurrence between Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic. In Classical Arabic, (/laa/ لا) of prohibition is the most frequent construction, which is rarely used in the Web corpus where the command in the form of (/lam/لام + verb) is the most commonly emerging one, which is, in turn, seldom employed in the former corpus. The vocative (/ya/ يا) is the second most frequent construction in Classical Arabic, whilst the interrogative (/hel/ هل) emerged in the other genre. The third most common request construction is the interrogative (/hel/ هل) in Classical Arabic, but the vocative (/ya/ يا) is used in Modern Arabic. Nonetheless, some of these constructions fail to accomplish two or more conditions and hence are regarded as infelicitous requests. Such infelicitous constructions serve other functions than requests, such as negation, exclamation, and sarcasm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信