D. Pratomo, Rizka Amelia Dwi Safira, Olivia Stefani
{"title":"基于地理信息系统的不同测深数据插值方法的比较:东爪哇巴威恩岛案例研究","authors":"D. Pratomo, Rizka Amelia Dwi Safira, Olivia Stefani","doi":"10.3846/gac.2023.18250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bottom surface’s portrayal is crucial in many different practices. Therefore, accurate bathymetry data is required. The interpolation method is one element that influences the accuracy of a Single Beam Echosounder’s depth data. IDW, Kriging, and TIN are three standard interpolation techniques. This study compares these three methods with two scenarios utilizing the spatial analysis to establish the most effective technique for producing the digital elevation model of the seafloor beneath Bawean Island. The IDW exhibits the strongest R-squared (0.9998779 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999875 in Scenario-2) and correlation (0.9998796 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999595 in Scenario-2). It indicates that IDW and bathymetric data have the closest relationships. IDW has the lowest error, as measured by the MAE value (0.02 in Scenario-1 and 0.009 in Scenario-2), followed in both cases by Kriging and TIN. Additionally, the RMSE for IDW shows the same outcome (0.045 in Scenario 1 and 0.016 in Scenario 2). In the meantime, comparing the first and second scenarios reveals that the second, which has fewer data, is preferable to the first. Since the MAE and RMSE in the first scenario are greater than those in the second, we may infer that more data leads to more significant errors.","PeriodicalId":44129,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Cartography","volume":"7 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GIS-BASED INTERPOLATION METHODS FOR BATHYMETRIC DATA: CASE STUDY OF BAWEAN ISLAND, EAST JAVA\",\"authors\":\"D. Pratomo, Rizka Amelia Dwi Safira, Olivia Stefani\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/gac.2023.18250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The bottom surface’s portrayal is crucial in many different practices. Therefore, accurate bathymetry data is required. The interpolation method is one element that influences the accuracy of a Single Beam Echosounder’s depth data. IDW, Kriging, and TIN are three standard interpolation techniques. This study compares these three methods with two scenarios utilizing the spatial analysis to establish the most effective technique for producing the digital elevation model of the seafloor beneath Bawean Island. The IDW exhibits the strongest R-squared (0.9998779 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999875 in Scenario-2) and correlation (0.9998796 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999595 in Scenario-2). It indicates that IDW and bathymetric data have the closest relationships. IDW has the lowest error, as measured by the MAE value (0.02 in Scenario-1 and 0.009 in Scenario-2), followed in both cases by Kriging and TIN. Additionally, the RMSE for IDW shows the same outcome (0.045 in Scenario 1 and 0.016 in Scenario 2). In the meantime, comparing the first and second scenarios reveals that the second, which has fewer data, is preferable to the first. Since the MAE and RMSE in the first scenario are greater than those in the second, we may infer that more data leads to more significant errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodesy and Cartography\",\"volume\":\"7 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodesy and Cartography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2023.18250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2023.18250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
底面的描绘在许多不同的实践中都至关重要。因此,需要精确的测深数据。插值方法是影响单波束回声测深仪深度数据准确性的因素之一。IDW、Kriging 和 TIN 是三种标准的插值技术。本研究将这三种方法与利用空间分析的两种方案进行比较,以确定制作巴威恩岛海底数字高程模型的最有效技术。IDW 显示出最强的 R 平方(方案 1 为 0.9998779,方案 2 为 0.9999875)和相关性(方案 1 为 0.9998796,方案 2 为 0.9999595)。这表明 IDW 和测深数据的关系最为密切。从 MAE 值来看,IDW 的误差最小(方案 1 为 0.02,方案 2 为 0.009),其次是克里金法和 TIN 法。此外,IDW 的 RMSE 也显示了相同的结果(方案 1 中为 0.045,方案 2 中为 0.016)。同时,比较第一种和第二种方案可以发现,数据较少的第二种方案优于第一种方案。由于第一种方案的 MAE 和 RMSE 大于第二种方案,我们可以推断数据越多,误差越大。
A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GIS-BASED INTERPOLATION METHODS FOR BATHYMETRIC DATA: CASE STUDY OF BAWEAN ISLAND, EAST JAVA
The bottom surface’s portrayal is crucial in many different practices. Therefore, accurate bathymetry data is required. The interpolation method is one element that influences the accuracy of a Single Beam Echosounder’s depth data. IDW, Kriging, and TIN are three standard interpolation techniques. This study compares these three methods with two scenarios utilizing the spatial analysis to establish the most effective technique for producing the digital elevation model of the seafloor beneath Bawean Island. The IDW exhibits the strongest R-squared (0.9998779 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999875 in Scenario-2) and correlation (0.9998796 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999595 in Scenario-2). It indicates that IDW and bathymetric data have the closest relationships. IDW has the lowest error, as measured by the MAE value (0.02 in Scenario-1 and 0.009 in Scenario-2), followed in both cases by Kriging and TIN. Additionally, the RMSE for IDW shows the same outcome (0.045 in Scenario 1 and 0.016 in Scenario 2). In the meantime, comparing the first and second scenarios reveals that the second, which has fewer data, is preferable to the first. Since the MAE and RMSE in the first scenario are greater than those in the second, we may infer that more data leads to more significant errors.
期刊介绍:
THE JOURNAL IS DESIGNED FOR PUBLISHING PAPERS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: •study, establishment and improvement of the geodesy and mapping technologies, •establishing and improving the geodetic networks, •theoretical and practical principles of developing standards for geodetic measurements, •mathematical treatment of the geodetic and photogrammetric measurements, •controlling and application of the permanent GPS stations, •study and measurements of Earth’s figure and parameters of the gravity field, •study and development the geoid models,