在圣保罗州非法销售的未经卫生检验的蜂蜜中欺诈行为频发

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ana Paula Florentino, Caroline da Veiga Lima, Giovana Galvão Morandini, Guilherme Cardoso da Silva, Laura Meiken Morelli, Lorena Battistin, Maria Eduarda Borges Pivato, Max Sândalo Ferreira da Silva, Mayara Ferreira VIEIRA, Mayara de Sousa Canute, Miguel Sionti de Medeiros Paulino, Pedro Caldeira de Araujo, Beatriz Rosa Cravo, Victória Ribeiro Silvestre, Lucas Gabriel de Souza Neckel, O. A. Martins, Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"在圣保罗州非法销售的未经卫生检验的蜂蜜中欺诈行为频发","authors":"Ana Paula Florentino, Caroline da Veiga Lima, Giovana Galvão Morandini, Guilherme Cardoso da Silva, Laura Meiken Morelli, Lorena Battistin, Maria Eduarda Borges Pivato, Max Sândalo Ferreira da Silva, Mayara Ferreira VIEIRA, Mayara de Sousa Canute, Miguel Sionti de Medeiros Paulino, Pedro Caldeira de Araujo, Beatriz Rosa Cravo, Victória Ribeiro Silvestre, Lucas Gabriel de Souza Neckel, O. A. Martins, Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.5327/fst.0026723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to analyze honey from São Paulo State according to its physical and chemical properties. Determination of free acidity, moisture, hydroxymethylfurfural, Lund test, diastase test, and Fiehe reaction were performed in 73 samples (32 illegal honey, without sanitary inspection, and 41 legal honey, with sanitary inspection). An ANOVA test was applied to evaluate differences in the samples. Three samples had humidity greater than 20%, and one sample had a positive profile in the qualitative analysis of HMF (Fiehe) and quantitative analysis above 60 mg/kg. A total of 21 (65%) illegal honeys had at least one parameter outside the legislation. The irregularities presented were in the acidity, followed by the increase of HMF, negative Lund, high acidity, and high moisture. Significant differences were observed when comparing illegal and legal honey for acidity and hydroxymethylfurfural analysis (p < 0.05). The Fiehe test was positive in 2.44% of legal honeys and 64.52% of illegal honeys. No legal honey was negative for the Lund test, and 22.58% of illegal honeys had a negative profile. The results showed that illegal honey is not suitable for consumption, being outside the standard of identity and quality determined by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and the legislation.","PeriodicalId":12404,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology","volume":"66 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High frequency of fraud in honey without sanitary inspection illegally sold in São Paulo State\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Florentino, Caroline da Veiga Lima, Giovana Galvão Morandini, Guilherme Cardoso da Silva, Laura Meiken Morelli, Lorena Battistin, Maria Eduarda Borges Pivato, Max Sândalo Ferreira da Silva, Mayara Ferreira VIEIRA, Mayara de Sousa Canute, Miguel Sionti de Medeiros Paulino, Pedro Caldeira de Araujo, Beatriz Rosa Cravo, Victória Ribeiro Silvestre, Lucas Gabriel de Souza Neckel, O. A. Martins, Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.5327/fst.0026723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to analyze honey from São Paulo State according to its physical and chemical properties. Determination of free acidity, moisture, hydroxymethylfurfural, Lund test, diastase test, and Fiehe reaction were performed in 73 samples (32 illegal honey, without sanitary inspection, and 41 legal honey, with sanitary inspection). An ANOVA test was applied to evaluate differences in the samples. Three samples had humidity greater than 20%, and one sample had a positive profile in the qualitative analysis of HMF (Fiehe) and quantitative analysis above 60 mg/kg. A total of 21 (65%) illegal honeys had at least one parameter outside the legislation. The irregularities presented were in the acidity, followed by the increase of HMF, negative Lund, high acidity, and high moisture. Significant differences were observed when comparing illegal and legal honey for acidity and hydroxymethylfurfural analysis (p < 0.05). The Fiehe test was positive in 2.44% of legal honeys and 64.52% of illegal honeys. No legal honey was negative for the Lund test, and 22.58% of illegal honeys had a negative profile. The results showed that illegal honey is not suitable for consumption, being outside the standard of identity and quality determined by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and the legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"66 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.0026723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.0026723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在根据物理和化学特性分析圣保罗州的蜂蜜。对 73 个样品(32 个未经卫生检验的非法蜂蜜和 41 个经卫生检验的合法蜂蜜)进行了游离酸度、水分、羟甲基糠醛、Lund 试验、diastase 试验和 Fiehe 反应测定。采用方差分析来评估样品之间的差异。三个样品的湿度大于 20%,一个样品的 HMF(费埃赫)定性分析呈阳性,定量分析超过 60 毫克/千克。共有 21 个(65%)非法蜂蜜样品的至少一个参数超出了法律规定。不符合规定的参数主要是酸度,其次是 HMF 增加、负伦德、高酸度和高水分。比较非法和合法蜂蜜的酸度和羟甲基糠醛分析结果,发现两者存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。有 2.44% 的合法蜂蜜和 64.52% 的非法蜂蜜在费厄(Fiehe)测试中呈阳性。没有一种合法蜂蜜在伦德测试中呈阴性,22.58%的非法蜂蜜呈阴性。结果表明,非法蜂蜜不适合食用,不符合食品法典委员会和法律规定的身份和质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High frequency of fraud in honey without sanitary inspection illegally sold in São Paulo State
The aim of this study was to analyze honey from São Paulo State according to its physical and chemical properties. Determination of free acidity, moisture, hydroxymethylfurfural, Lund test, diastase test, and Fiehe reaction were performed in 73 samples (32 illegal honey, without sanitary inspection, and 41 legal honey, with sanitary inspection). An ANOVA test was applied to evaluate differences in the samples. Three samples had humidity greater than 20%, and one sample had a positive profile in the qualitative analysis of HMF (Fiehe) and quantitative analysis above 60 mg/kg. A total of 21 (65%) illegal honeys had at least one parameter outside the legislation. The irregularities presented were in the acidity, followed by the increase of HMF, negative Lund, high acidity, and high moisture. Significant differences were observed when comparing illegal and legal honey for acidity and hydroxymethylfurfural analysis (p < 0.05). The Fiehe test was positive in 2.44% of legal honeys and 64.52% of illegal honeys. No legal honey was negative for the Lund test, and 22.58% of illegal honeys had a negative profile. The results showed that illegal honey is not suitable for consumption, being outside the standard of identity and quality determined by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and the legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science and Technology
Food Science and Technology 农林科学-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信