不同最终灌洗方案下生物陶瓷根管封闭器的推出粘接强度评估

Bilge Özcan, Burcu Biçer, F. Saklar, Lena Bal
{"title":"不同最终灌洗方案下生物陶瓷根管封闭器的推出粘接强度评估","authors":"Bilge Özcan, Burcu Biçer, F. Saklar, Lena Bal","doi":"10.7546/crabs.2023.12.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the bond strength of bioceramic root canal sealers, with different final irrigation protocols. A total of 104 human upper incisor teeth were selected for applying four different irrigation solutions (Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), Chlorine Hexidine Gluconate (CHX), Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), and Distilled Water (D.W)) and two root canal sealer protocols (Endosequence BC (BC), Well-Root ST (ST)), in this in vitro study. After root canal treatment specimens were sectioned to three parts (coronal, middle, and apical). Push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (Zwick-Roel, Germany) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Regardless of the irrigation protocol and sealer used, the highest bond strength values were obtained from the apical section ($$p<0.05$$). 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + D.W statistically showed the highest bond strength value and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + 2% CHX group showed the lowest value in this study ($$p<0.05$$). The bond strength values of Endosequence BC Sealer were statistically higher than the bond strength values of Well Root ST ($$p<0.05$$). According to the final irrigation, Endosequence BC Sealer and Well Root ST root canal sealers showed the highest bonding strength in  CHX + EDTA + D.W and NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl groups.","PeriodicalId":104760,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences","volume":"58 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers with Different Final Irrigation Protocols\",\"authors\":\"Bilge Özcan, Burcu Biçer, F. Saklar, Lena Bal\",\"doi\":\"10.7546/crabs.2023.12.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to evaluate the bond strength of bioceramic root canal sealers, with different final irrigation protocols. A total of 104 human upper incisor teeth were selected for applying four different irrigation solutions (Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), Chlorine Hexidine Gluconate (CHX), Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), and Distilled Water (D.W)) and two root canal sealer protocols (Endosequence BC (BC), Well-Root ST (ST)), in this in vitro study. After root canal treatment specimens were sectioned to three parts (coronal, middle, and apical). Push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (Zwick-Roel, Germany) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Regardless of the irrigation protocol and sealer used, the highest bond strength values were obtained from the apical section ($$p<0.05$$). 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + D.W statistically showed the highest bond strength value and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + 2% CHX group showed the lowest value in this study ($$p<0.05$$). The bond strength values of Endosequence BC Sealer were statistically higher than the bond strength values of Well Root ST ($$p<0.05$$). According to the final irrigation, Endosequence BC Sealer and Well Root ST root canal sealers showed the highest bonding strength in  CHX + EDTA + D.W and NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"58 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2023.12.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2023.12.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估生物陶瓷根管封闭剂在不同最终灌洗方案下的粘接强度。在这项体外研究中,共选取了 104 颗人类上切牙,采用四种不同的灌洗溶液(乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、葡萄糖酸氯己啶(CHX)、次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和蒸馏水(D.W))和两种根管封闭剂方案(Endosequence BC(BC)、Well-Root ST(ST))。根管治疗后,试样被切成三个部分(冠状、中间和根尖)。在万能试验机(Zwick-Roel,德国)上以 1 毫米/分钟的十字头速度进行推出粘接强度测试。无论使用何种灌洗方案和封闭剂,根尖部分的粘接强度值最高($$p<0.05$$)。据统计,5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl 和 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + D.W 组的粘接强度值最高,而 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + 2% CHX 组的粘接强度值最低($$p<0.05$$)。据统计,Endosequence BC 封闭剂的粘接强度值高于 Well Root ST 的粘接强度值($$p<0.05$$)。根据最终灌洗结果,在 CHX + EDTA + D.W 组和 NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl 组中,Endosequence BC 封闭剂和 Well Root ST 根管封闭剂的粘接强度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers with Different Final Irrigation Protocols
This study aims to evaluate the bond strength of bioceramic root canal sealers, with different final irrigation protocols. A total of 104 human upper incisor teeth were selected for applying four different irrigation solutions (Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), Chlorine Hexidine Gluconate (CHX), Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), and Distilled Water (D.W)) and two root canal sealer protocols (Endosequence BC (BC), Well-Root ST (ST)), in this in vitro study. After root canal treatment specimens were sectioned to three parts (coronal, middle, and apical). Push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (Zwick-Roel, Germany) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Regardless of the irrigation protocol and sealer used, the highest bond strength values were obtained from the apical section ($$p<0.05$$). 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + D.W statistically showed the highest bond strength value and 2% CHX + 17% EDTA + 2% CHX group showed the lowest value in this study ($$p<0.05$$). The bond strength values of Endosequence BC Sealer were statistically higher than the bond strength values of Well Root ST ($$p<0.05$$). According to the final irrigation, Endosequence BC Sealer and Well Root ST root canal sealers showed the highest bonding strength in  CHX + EDTA + D.W and NaOCl + EDTA + NaOCl groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信