教师如何根据专业学习做出决定:三年级数学差异化教学研究

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Rachael A. Cody, Gregory T. Boldt, E. J. Gubbins
{"title":"教师如何根据专业学习做出决定:三年级数学差异化教学研究","authors":"Rachael A. Cody, Gregory T. Boldt, E. J. Gubbins","doi":"10.1177/1932202x231221143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used a mixed-methods design to examine teachers’ responses to professional learning on mathematics differentiation. Grade 3 classroom teachers ( N = 28) attended four 2-h professional learning sessions and an additional 2 h individually on differentiation and completed pre- and post-surveys with quantitative and short response items assessing their experiences. Although teachers did not report changes in overall differentiation rates, implementation of less extensive practices (i.e., talk moves and mathematical practices) increased. Changes did not appear to be driven by teachers’ valuation of differentiation, which was high across surveys. Rather, a thematic analysis indicated that teachers simultaneously weighed benefits, challenges, and alignment with existing practices when making decisions about whether to implement differentiation strategies.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":"54 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Teachers Make Decisions in Response to Professional Learning: A Study on Grade 3 Differentiation in Mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Rachael A. Cody, Gregory T. Boldt, E. J. Gubbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1932202x231221143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study used a mixed-methods design to examine teachers’ responses to professional learning on mathematics differentiation. Grade 3 classroom teachers ( N = 28) attended four 2-h professional learning sessions and an additional 2 h individually on differentiation and completed pre- and post-surveys with quantitative and short response items assessing their experiences. Although teachers did not report changes in overall differentiation rates, implementation of less extensive practices (i.e., talk moves and mathematical practices) increased. Changes did not appear to be driven by teachers’ valuation of differentiation, which was high across surveys. Rather, a thematic analysis indicated that teachers simultaneously weighed benefits, challenges, and alignment with existing practices when making decisions about whether to implement differentiation strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"volume\":\"54 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231221143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231221143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用混合方法设计,考察教师对数学分层教学专业学习的反应。三年级的任课教师(28 人)参加了四次为期 2 个小时的专业学习课程和另外 2 个小时的个别分层教学课程,并完成了前后问卷调查,其中包括定量和简答项目,以评估他们的经验。尽管教师们没有报告总体差异化比率的变化,但实施不太广泛的实践(即谈话动作和数学实践)的情况有所增加。这些变化似乎并不是由教师对分层教学的评价驱动的,因为在所有调查中,教师对分层教学的评价都很高。相反,专题分析表明,教师在决定是否实施差异化策略时,同时权衡了效益、挑战和与现 有实践的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Teachers Make Decisions in Response to Professional Learning: A Study on Grade 3 Differentiation in Mathematics
This study used a mixed-methods design to examine teachers’ responses to professional learning on mathematics differentiation. Grade 3 classroom teachers ( N = 28) attended four 2-h professional learning sessions and an additional 2 h individually on differentiation and completed pre- and post-surveys with quantitative and short response items assessing their experiences. Although teachers did not report changes in overall differentiation rates, implementation of less extensive practices (i.e., talk moves and mathematical practices) increased. Changes did not appear to be driven by teachers’ valuation of differentiation, which was high across surveys. Rather, a thematic analysis indicated that teachers simultaneously weighed benefits, challenges, and alignment with existing practices when making decisions about whether to implement differentiation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信