Melanie M. Beasley , Margaret J. Schoeninger , Randy Miller , Eric J. Bartelink
{"title":"在评估稳定同位素分析样本质量控制措施时,骨有机成分的保存不能预测骨无机成分的保存情况","authors":"Melanie M. Beasley , Margaret J. Schoeninger , Randy Miller , Eric J. Bartelink","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2023.105886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stable isotope analysis of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) of archaeological bone has become an increasingly common research method for interpreting human behavior in the past. However, diagenesis of skeletal material can invalidate stable isotope ratios, thereby compromising interpretations. We examine patterns of bone diagenesis using infrared spectroscopy of bone bioapatite samples in relation to indicators of organic preservation quality indicators. We assess crystallinity, an indicator of bioapatite preservation, using the infrared splitting factor (IR-SF) and carbonate content (carbonate to phosphate ratio, C/P) calculated from infrared spectra. We then test the assumption that if the organic fraction of bone is preserved, the mineral fraction will also be unaffected by postmortem chemical alteration. We analyzed 454 bone bioapatite and extracted bone organic sample pairs from modern, historic, and prehistoric humans. Consistent with previous studies, we observed a strong, statistically significant negative linear relationship between IR-SF and C/P (r = −0.855, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Modern bone bioapatite samples unaltered by diagenesis have low IR-SF and high C/P values. There was no significant association between the collagen yield or atomic C:N ratio and IR-SF or C/P values. The range of variation in IR-SF and C/P values for samples with organic yields between 0 and >20 percent spanned the range of modern bone bioapatite unaltered by diagenesis as well as bone bioapatite significantly affected by diagenesis. The lack of predictive patterning between bone inorganic and organic diagenesis suggests that the depositional context and site formation history play critical and independent roles in the organic and mineral fraction of bone. Thus, the preservation of the organic fraction of bone is not predictive of the preservation of the inorganic fraction (e.g., bioapatite).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preservation of bone organic fraction is not predictive of the preservation of bone inorganic fraction when assessing stable isotope analysis sample quality control measures\",\"authors\":\"Melanie M. Beasley , Margaret J. Schoeninger , Randy Miller , Eric J. Bartelink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2023.105886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stable isotope analysis of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) of archaeological bone has become an increasingly common research method for interpreting human behavior in the past. However, diagenesis of skeletal material can invalidate stable isotope ratios, thereby compromising interpretations. We examine patterns of bone diagenesis using infrared spectroscopy of bone bioapatite samples in relation to indicators of organic preservation quality indicators. We assess crystallinity, an indicator of bioapatite preservation, using the infrared splitting factor (IR-SF) and carbonate content (carbonate to phosphate ratio, C/P) calculated from infrared spectra. We then test the assumption that if the organic fraction of bone is preserved, the mineral fraction will also be unaffected by postmortem chemical alteration. We analyzed 454 bone bioapatite and extracted bone organic sample pairs from modern, historic, and prehistoric humans. Consistent with previous studies, we observed a strong, statistically significant negative linear relationship between IR-SF and C/P (r = −0.855, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Modern bone bioapatite samples unaltered by diagenesis have low IR-SF and high C/P values. There was no significant association between the collagen yield or atomic C:N ratio and IR-SF or C/P values. The range of variation in IR-SF and C/P values for samples with organic yields between 0 and >20 percent spanned the range of modern bone bioapatite unaltered by diagenesis as well as bone bioapatite significantly affected by diagenesis. The lack of predictive patterning between bone inorganic and organic diagenesis suggests that the depositional context and site formation history play critical and independent roles in the organic and mineral fraction of bone. Thus, the preservation of the organic fraction of bone is not predictive of the preservation of the inorganic fraction (e.g., bioapatite).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440323001668\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440323001668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preservation of bone organic fraction is not predictive of the preservation of bone inorganic fraction when assessing stable isotope analysis sample quality control measures
Stable isotope analysis of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) of archaeological bone has become an increasingly common research method for interpreting human behavior in the past. However, diagenesis of skeletal material can invalidate stable isotope ratios, thereby compromising interpretations. We examine patterns of bone diagenesis using infrared spectroscopy of bone bioapatite samples in relation to indicators of organic preservation quality indicators. We assess crystallinity, an indicator of bioapatite preservation, using the infrared splitting factor (IR-SF) and carbonate content (carbonate to phosphate ratio, C/P) calculated from infrared spectra. We then test the assumption that if the organic fraction of bone is preserved, the mineral fraction will also be unaffected by postmortem chemical alteration. We analyzed 454 bone bioapatite and extracted bone organic sample pairs from modern, historic, and prehistoric humans. Consistent with previous studies, we observed a strong, statistically significant negative linear relationship between IR-SF and C/P (r = −0.855, p < 0.001). Modern bone bioapatite samples unaltered by diagenesis have low IR-SF and high C/P values. There was no significant association between the collagen yield or atomic C:N ratio and IR-SF or C/P values. The range of variation in IR-SF and C/P values for samples with organic yields between 0 and >20 percent spanned the range of modern bone bioapatite unaltered by diagenesis as well as bone bioapatite significantly affected by diagenesis. The lack of predictive patterning between bone inorganic and organic diagenesis suggests that the depositional context and site formation history play critical and independent roles in the organic and mineral fraction of bone. Thus, the preservation of the organic fraction of bone is not predictive of the preservation of the inorganic fraction (e.g., bioapatite).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.