利用几何形态计量学和实验炭化鉴定考古大麦粒

IF 2.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Angèle Jeanty , Jérôme Ros , Cyprien Mureau , Camille Dham , Célia Lecomte , Vincent Bonhomme , Sarah Ivorra , Isabel Figueiral , Laurent Bouby , Allowen Evin
{"title":"利用几何形态计量学和实验炭化鉴定考古大麦粒","authors":"Angèle Jeanty ,&nbsp;Jérôme Ros ,&nbsp;Cyprien Mureau ,&nbsp;Camille Dham ,&nbsp;Célia Lecomte ,&nbsp;Vincent Bonhomme ,&nbsp;Sarah Ivorra ,&nbsp;Isabel Figueiral ,&nbsp;Laurent Bouby ,&nbsp;Allowen Evin","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2023.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Barley is one of the main cereals found in archaeological sites<span> in the north-western Mediterranean basin, over the last 8 millennia. Grains are preserved in archaeological sediments by charring after or before dehusking. Morphological criteria for distinguishing 2-row from 6-row barley, but also hulled barley from naked barley, can be affected by charring and this can complicate identification of barley subgroups. In the last decade, geometric morphometrics applied to uncharred barley grains has shown the possibility of identifying barley subgroups, but its applicability to archaeological remains still needs to be ascertained. We used 3985 raw and charred grains of 113 current varieties to (1) assess charring effects on the shape of barley caryopses, depending on their subgroup and whether they were charred husked or dehusked and (2) select the best dataset for identifying barley subgroups. We also used 700 archaeological grains, from the Neolithic period to the end of the Middle Ages, to (3) compare the morphometric taxonomic assignment of the grains with their carpological identification based on discrete anatomical features in a series of 7 archaeological samples. Our results indicate size and shape differences between barley grains when charred husked or dehusked. Although the charring process results in greater morphometric homogeneity, it allows subgroups of barley to be identified. For the 2-row vs. 6-row identification, more than 71% of the charred modern grains can be correctly identified. For the hulled vs. naked identification, the correct cross-validation percentages range from 70 to 73%. Finally, the good correlation between carpological and morphometric identifications of archaeological grains suggests that it is possible to identify archaeobotanical samples in the future.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of archaeological barley grains using geometric morphometrics and experimental charring\",\"authors\":\"Angèle Jeanty ,&nbsp;Jérôme Ros ,&nbsp;Cyprien Mureau ,&nbsp;Camille Dham ,&nbsp;Célia Lecomte ,&nbsp;Vincent Bonhomme ,&nbsp;Sarah Ivorra ,&nbsp;Isabel Figueiral ,&nbsp;Laurent Bouby ,&nbsp;Allowen Evin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2023.105924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Barley is one of the main cereals found in archaeological sites<span> in the north-western Mediterranean basin, over the last 8 millennia. Grains are preserved in archaeological sediments by charring after or before dehusking. Morphological criteria for distinguishing 2-row from 6-row barley, but also hulled barley from naked barley, can be affected by charring and this can complicate identification of barley subgroups. In the last decade, geometric morphometrics applied to uncharred barley grains has shown the possibility of identifying barley subgroups, but its applicability to archaeological remains still needs to be ascertained. We used 3985 raw and charred grains of 113 current varieties to (1) assess charring effects on the shape of barley caryopses, depending on their subgroup and whether they were charred husked or dehusked and (2) select the best dataset for identifying barley subgroups. We also used 700 archaeological grains, from the Neolithic period to the end of the Middle Ages, to (3) compare the morphometric taxonomic assignment of the grains with their carpological identification based on discrete anatomical features in a series of 7 archaeological samples. Our results indicate size and shape differences between barley grains when charred husked or dehusked. Although the charring process results in greater morphometric homogeneity, it allows subgroups of barley to be identified. For the 2-row vs. 6-row identification, more than 71% of the charred modern grains can be correctly identified. For the hulled vs. naked identification, the correct cross-validation percentages range from 70 to 73%. Finally, the good correlation between carpological and morphometric identifications of archaeological grains suggests that it is possible to identify archaeobotanical samples in the future.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440323002042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440323002042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大麦是过去八千年间在地中海盆地西北部考古遗址中发现的主要谷物之一。考古沉积物中的谷物是在脱壳后或脱壳前通过炭化保存下来的。区分 2 行大麦和 6 行大麦以及去壳大麦和裸大麦的形态学标准会受到炭化的影响,从而使大麦亚群的鉴定变得复杂。近十年来,几何形态计量学在未炭化大麦粒上的应用显示了识别大麦亚群的可能性,但其对考古遗迹的适用性仍有待确定。我们使用了 113 个现有品种的 3985 颗未炭化和已炭化大麦粒,目的是:(1) 评估炭化对大麦穗形状的影响,具体影响取决于大麦穗的亚群以及大麦穗是带壳炭化还是脱壳炭化;(2) 选择用于识别大麦穗亚群的最佳数据集。我们还使用了从新石器时代到中世纪末期的 700 颗考古谷物,(3) 在一系列 7 个考古样本中,根据离散的解剖学特征,比较了谷物的形态分类分配和鲤鱼学鉴定。我们的研究结果表明,炭化去壳或脱壳后的大麦粒在大小和形状上存在差异。尽管炭化过程会导致形态上更大的同质性,但也能识别出大麦的亚群。在 2 行与 6 行的鉴别中,超过 71% 的炭化现代大麦粒可以被正确识别。在去壳与裸麦的鉴别中,交叉验证的正确率在 70% 到 73% 之间。最后,考古谷物的鲤鱼学鉴定与形态计量学鉴定之间的良好相关性表明,未来有可能对考古植物样本进行鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of archaeological barley grains using geometric morphometrics and experimental charring

Barley is one of the main cereals found in archaeological sites in the north-western Mediterranean basin, over the last 8 millennia. Grains are preserved in archaeological sediments by charring after or before dehusking. Morphological criteria for distinguishing 2-row from 6-row barley, but also hulled barley from naked barley, can be affected by charring and this can complicate identification of barley subgroups. In the last decade, geometric morphometrics applied to uncharred barley grains has shown the possibility of identifying barley subgroups, but its applicability to archaeological remains still needs to be ascertained. We used 3985 raw and charred grains of 113 current varieties to (1) assess charring effects on the shape of barley caryopses, depending on their subgroup and whether they were charred husked or dehusked and (2) select the best dataset for identifying barley subgroups. We also used 700 archaeological grains, from the Neolithic period to the end of the Middle Ages, to (3) compare the morphometric taxonomic assignment of the grains with their carpological identification based on discrete anatomical features in a series of 7 archaeological samples. Our results indicate size and shape differences between barley grains when charred husked or dehusked. Although the charring process results in greater morphometric homogeneity, it allows subgroups of barley to be identified. For the 2-row vs. 6-row identification, more than 71% of the charred modern grains can be correctly identified. For the hulled vs. naked identification, the correct cross-validation percentages range from 70 to 73%. Finally, the good correlation between carpological and morphometric identifications of archaeological grains suggests that it is possible to identify archaeobotanical samples in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信