权力可以增加,但也可以减少,这取决于哪些想法得到了验证

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Grigorios Lamprinakos , David Santos , Maria Stavraki , Pablo Briñol , Solon Magrizos , Richard E. Petty
{"title":"权力可以增加,但也可以减少,这取决于哪些想法得到了验证","authors":"Grigorios Lamprinakos ,&nbsp;David Santos ,&nbsp;Maria Stavraki ,&nbsp;Pablo Briñol ,&nbsp;Solon Magrizos ,&nbsp;Richard E. Petty","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research, we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating, depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments, participants were first asked to generate either positive or negative thoughts about cheating. Following this manipulation of thought direction, participants were placed in either high or low power conditions. After the two inductions, cheating was measured using different paradigms – assessing cheating intentions in relationships (Study 1) and over reporting performance for monetary gain (Study 2). Relative to powerless participants, those induced to feel powerful showed more reliance on the initial thoughts induced. Consequently, the effect of the direction of the thoughts on cheating was greater for participants with high (vs. low) power. Specifically, high power increased cheating only when initial thoughts about cheating were already favorable but decreased cheating when it validated unfavorable cheating relevant thoughts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312300135X/pdfft?md5=6117c69b28d89d5b9306bfe4db2a9939&pid=1-s2.0-S002210312300135X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated\",\"authors\":\"Grigorios Lamprinakos ,&nbsp;David Santos ,&nbsp;Maria Stavraki ,&nbsp;Pablo Briñol ,&nbsp;Solon Magrizos ,&nbsp;Richard E. Petty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Prior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research, we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating, depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments, participants were first asked to generate either positive or negative thoughts about cheating. Following this manipulation of thought direction, participants were placed in either high or low power conditions. After the two inductions, cheating was measured using different paradigms – assessing cheating intentions in relationships (Study 1) and over reporting performance for monetary gain (Study 2). Relative to powerless participants, those induced to feel powerful showed more reliance on the initial thoughts induced. Consequently, the effect of the direction of the thoughts on cheating was greater for participants with high (vs. low) power. Specifically, high power increased cheating only when initial thoughts about cheating were already favorable but decreased cheating when it validated unfavorable cheating relevant thoughts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312300135X/pdfft?md5=6117c69b28d89d5b9306bfe4db2a9939&pid=1-s2.0-S002210312300135X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312300135X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312300135X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,权力与作弊有关。在本研究中,我们展示了较高的权力会增加作弊行为,但也会减少作弊行为,这取决于权力感所验证的想法。在两个实验中,首先要求参与者对作弊产生积极或消极的想法。在对思维方向进行操纵后,参与者被置于高功率或低功率条件下。两次诱导之后,使用不同的范式对作弊行为进行了测量--评估人际关系中的作弊意图(研究 1)和为了金钱利益而多报成绩(研究 2)。与没有权力的参与者相比,那些被诱导出有权力感的参与者更依赖于最初诱导出的想法。因此,对于高(与低)权力的参与者来说,想法的方向对作弊的影响更大。具体来说,只有当最初关于作弊的想法已经对作弊有利时,高功率才会增加作弊行为,但当它验证了不利的作弊相关想法时,作弊行为就会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated

Prior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research, we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating, depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments, participants were first asked to generate either positive or negative thoughts about cheating. Following this manipulation of thought direction, participants were placed in either high or low power conditions. After the two inductions, cheating was measured using different paradigms – assessing cheating intentions in relationships (Study 1) and over reporting performance for monetary gain (Study 2). Relative to powerless participants, those induced to feel powerful showed more reliance on the initial thoughts induced. Consequently, the effect of the direction of the thoughts on cheating was greater for participants with high (vs. low) power. Specifically, high power increased cheating only when initial thoughts about cheating were already favorable but decreased cheating when it validated unfavorable cheating relevant thoughts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信