Maria Vittoria Togo, Fabrizio Mastrolorito, Angelica Orfino, Elisabetta Anna Graps, Anna Rita Tondo, Cosimo Damiano Altomare, Fulvio Ciriaco, Daniela Trisciuzzi, Orazio Nicolotti, Nicola Amoroso
{"title":"发育毒性与可解释人工智能的结合:最新进展与前景。","authors":"Maria Vittoria Togo, Fabrizio Mastrolorito, Angelica Orfino, Elisabetta Anna Graps, Anna Rita Tondo, Cosimo Damiano Altomare, Fulvio Ciriaco, Daniela Trisciuzzi, Orazio Nicolotti, Nicola Amoroso","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2023.2298827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to predictive toxicology is rapidly increasing, particularly aiming to develop non-testing methods that effectively address ethical concerns and reduce economic costs. In this context, Developmental Toxicity (Dev Tox) stands as a key human health endpoint, especially significant for safeguarding maternal and child well-being.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review outlines the existing methods employed in Dev Tox predictions and underscores the benefits of utilizing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), specifically focusing on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which proves highly efficient in constructing reliable and transparent models aligned with recommendations from international regulatory bodies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The limited availability of high-quality data and the absence of dependable Dev Tox methodologies render XAI an appealing avenue for systematically developing interpretable and transparent models, which hold immense potential for both scientific evaluations and regulatory decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94005,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"561-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where developmental toxicity meets explainable artificial intelligence: state-of-the-art and perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Vittoria Togo, Fabrizio Mastrolorito, Angelica Orfino, Elisabetta Anna Graps, Anna Rita Tondo, Cosimo Damiano Altomare, Fulvio Ciriaco, Daniela Trisciuzzi, Orazio Nicolotti, Nicola Amoroso\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2023.2298827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to predictive toxicology is rapidly increasing, particularly aiming to develop non-testing methods that effectively address ethical concerns and reduce economic costs. In this context, Developmental Toxicity (Dev Tox) stands as a key human health endpoint, especially significant for safeguarding maternal and child well-being.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review outlines the existing methods employed in Dev Tox predictions and underscores the benefits of utilizing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), specifically focusing on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which proves highly efficient in constructing reliable and transparent models aligned with recommendations from international regulatory bodies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The limited availability of high-quality data and the absence of dependable Dev Tox methodologies render XAI an appealing avenue for systematically developing interpretable and transparent models, which hold immense potential for both scientific evaluations and regulatory decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"561-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2298827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2023.2298827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:人工智能(AI)在预测毒理学中的应用正在迅速增加,特别是旨在开发非检测方法,以有效解决伦理问题并降低经济成本。在此背景下,发育毒性(Dev Tox)是人类健康的一个关键终点,对保障母婴健康尤为重要:本综述概述了现有的发育毒性预测方法,并强调了利用新方法(NAMs)的益处,特别侧重于可解释人工智能(XAI),该方法在构建与国际监管机构建议一致的可靠而透明的模型方面被证明具有很高的效率:专家意见:高质量数据的有限可用性和可靠的 Dev Tox 方法的缺失,使 XAI 成为系统开发可解释和透明模型的一个极具吸引力的途径,这对于科学评估和监管决策都具有巨大潜力。
Where developmental toxicity meets explainable artificial intelligence: state-of-the-art and perspectives.
Introduction: The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to predictive toxicology is rapidly increasing, particularly aiming to develop non-testing methods that effectively address ethical concerns and reduce economic costs. In this context, Developmental Toxicity (Dev Tox) stands as a key human health endpoint, especially significant for safeguarding maternal and child well-being.
Areas covered: This review outlines the existing methods employed in Dev Tox predictions and underscores the benefits of utilizing New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), specifically focusing on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which proves highly efficient in constructing reliable and transparent models aligned with recommendations from international regulatory bodies.
Expert opinion: The limited availability of high-quality data and the absence of dependable Dev Tox methodologies render XAI an appealing avenue for systematically developing interpretable and transparent models, which hold immense potential for both scientific evaluations and regulatory decision-making.