{"title":"评估生成式人工智能时代的计算机编程技能学习。","authors":"Sara Ellen Wilson, Matthew Nishimoto","doi":"10.1115/1.4064364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude have recently become a concern in the delivery of engineering education. For courses focused on computer coding, such tools are capable for creating working computer code across a range of computer languages and computing platforms. In a course for mechanical engineers focused on C++ coding for the Arduino microcontroller and coding engineering problems in Matlab, a new approach to assessment of programing homework assignments was developed. This assessment moved the focus of assigned points from the correctness of the code to the effort and understanding of the code demonstrated by the student during in-person grading. Students who participated fully in in-person grading did significantly better on a midterm exam. Relative to a previous semester, where grading was focused on correct code, students had a slightly higher average midterm exam score. This approach appears to be effective in supporting computational learning in the face of evolving tools that could be used to circumvent learning. Future work should examine how to also encourage responsible use of generative AI in computational learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Learning of Computer Programing Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Ellen Wilson, Matthew Nishimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude have recently become a concern in the delivery of engineering education. For courses focused on computer coding, such tools are capable for creating working computer code across a range of computer languages and computing platforms. In a course for mechanical engineers focused on C++ coding for the Arduino microcontroller and coding engineering problems in Matlab, a new approach to assessment of programing homework assignments was developed. This assessment moved the focus of assigned points from the correctness of the code to the effort and understanding of the code demonstrated by the student during in-person grading. Students who participated fully in in-person grading did significantly better on a midterm exam. Relative to a previous semester, where grading was focused on correct code, students had a slightly higher average midterm exam score. This approach appears to be effective in supporting computational learning in the face of evolving tools that could be used to circumvent learning. Future work should examine how to also encourage responsible use of generative AI in computational learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生成式人工智能(AI)工具,如 ChatGPT、Bard 和 Claude,最近已成为工程教育中备受关注的工具。对于以计算机编码为重点的课程,这些工具能够在一系列计算机语言和计算平台上创建工作计算机代码。在一门针对机械工程师的课程中,重点是 Arduino 微控制器的 C++ 编码和 Matlab 工程问题编码,开发了一种新的编程作业评估方法。这种评估方法将赋分的重点从代码的正确性转移到学生在当面评分时所表现出的努力和对代码的理解上。充分参与当面评分的学生在期中考试中的成绩明显更好。与上一学期相比,本学期的评分侧重于代码的正确性,学生的期中考试平均分略高。面对不断发展的可用于规避学习的工具,这种方法似乎能有效支持计算学习。未来的工作应该研究如何在计算学习中鼓励负责任地使用生成式人工智能。
Assessing Learning of Computer Programing Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude have recently become a concern in the delivery of engineering education. For courses focused on computer coding, such tools are capable for creating working computer code across a range of computer languages and computing platforms. In a course for mechanical engineers focused on C++ coding for the Arduino microcontroller and coding engineering problems in Matlab, a new approach to assessment of programing homework assignments was developed. This assessment moved the focus of assigned points from the correctness of the code to the effort and understanding of the code demonstrated by the student during in-person grading. Students who participated fully in in-person grading did significantly better on a midterm exam. Relative to a previous semester, where grading was focused on correct code, students had a slightly higher average midterm exam score. This approach appears to be effective in supporting computational learning in the face of evolving tools that could be used to circumvent learning. Future work should examine how to also encourage responsible use of generative AI in computational learning.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.