评估视觉功能障碍在视觉症状与使用数码设备之间的关联中的作用。

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz
{"title":"评估视觉功能障碍在视觉症状与使用数码设备之间的关联中的作用。","authors":"Pilar Cacho-Martínez ,&nbsp;Mario Cantó-Cerdán ,&nbsp;Francisco Lara-Lacárcel ,&nbsp;Ángel García-Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, <em>p</em> = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, <em>p</em> = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584/pdfft?md5=574ea5b5c736bb93ffc991d577053571&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000584-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Cacho-Martínez ,&nbsp;Mario Cantó-Cerdán ,&nbsp;Francisco Lara-Lacárcel ,&nbsp;Ángel García-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, <em>p</em> = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, <em>p</em> = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584/pdfft?md5=574ea5b5c736bb93ffc991d577053571&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000584-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到存在视觉功能障碍,评估视觉症状与使用数码设备之间的关联:方法:对 346 名临床样本患者进行视力检查,以诊断任何类型的视觉异常。使用经过验证的 SQVD 问卷收集视觉症状。使用数字设备的影响以每天 6 小时为阈值进行量化,并将患者分为两组:35 岁以下和 35 岁以上。研究人员采用多变量逻辑回归法研究使用数码设备与症状之间的关系,并将视觉功能障碍视为混杂变量。结果显示,57.02%的受试者表示使用过数字设备:57.02%的受试者报告了视觉症状,65.02%的受试者表现出某种形式的视觉功能障碍。在 35 岁以下的患者中,发现视觉症状与使用数字设备之间存在关联(OR = 2.10,P = 0.01)。然而,在对视觉功能障碍进行调整后,这种关联消失了(OR = 1.44,p = 0.27),取而代之的是症状与屈光功能障碍(OR = 6.52,p < 0.001)、适应功能障碍(OR = 10.47,p < 0.001)、双眼功能障碍(OR = 6.68,p < 0.001)和适应功能障碍加双眼功能障碍(OR = 46.84,p < 0.001)之间的关联。在 35 岁以上的患者中,没有发现症状与使用数码设备有关(OR = 1.27,p = 0.49),但症状与屈光功能障碍有关(OR = 3.54,p = 0.001):视觉症状并不取决于使用数码设备的时间长短,而是取决于是否存在任何类型的视觉功能障碍:屈光性、适应性和/或双眼功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices

Purpose

To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.

Methods

An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.

Results

57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, p = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, p = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, p < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, p < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, p < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, p < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, p = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信