Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz
{"title":"评估视觉功能障碍在视觉症状与使用数码设备之间的关联中的作用。","authors":"Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, <em>p</em> = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, <em>p</em> < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, <em>p</em> < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, <em>p</em> = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584/pdfft?md5=574ea5b5c736bb93ffc991d577053571&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000584-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Cacho-Martínez , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Francisco Lara-Lacárcel , Ángel García-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, <em>p</em> = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, <em>p</em> = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, <em>p</em> < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, <em>p</em> < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, <em>p</em> = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584/pdfft?md5=574ea5b5c736bb93ffc991d577053571&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000584-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices
Purpose
To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions.
Methods
An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable.
Results
57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, p = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, p = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, p < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, p < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, p < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, p < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, p = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.