{"title":"利用无人机在生育期获取的特征加强直播水稻产量预测","authors":"Guodong Yang, Yaxing Li, Shen Yuan, Changzai Zhou, Hongshun Xiang, Zhenqing Zhao, Qiaorong Wei, Qingshan Chen, Shaobing Peng, Le Xu","doi":"10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice is critical for guiding crop interventions and food security assessment in precision agriculture. Technology advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has provided an unprecedented opportunity to efficiently retrieve crop growth parameters instead of labor-intensive ground measurements. This study is aiming to evaluate the feasibility of fusing multi-temporal UAV-derived features collected at critical phenological stages in forecasting direct-seeded rice yield across different cultivars and nitrogen (N) management. The results showed that RGB sensor-derived canopy volume, canopy coverage, and spectral features including RBRI, WI etc., were identified to be most sensitive to the differences in aboveground biomass and grain yield. Heading stage was the suitable time for estimating yield performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75) for mono-temporal UAV observation. By contrast, multi-temporal features fusion could remarkably enhance the yield prediction accuracy. Moreover, the yield prediction accuracy can be further improved by integrating UAV features collected at panicle initiation and heading stages (i.e., rice reproductive phase) compared to multi-temporal features fusion (R<sup>2</sup> increased from 0.82 to 0.85 and RMSE decreased from 35.1 to 31.5 g m<sup>−2</sup>). This can be attributed to the fact that the biomass accumulation during the reproductive phase was closely associated to the total spikelets and final yield. By using this proposed approach, the predicted yield showed a good spatial consistency with the measured yield across different cultivars and N management, and yield prediction error in the most of the plots (114 of 128 plots) was less than 45 g m<sup>−2</sup>. In summary, this study highlights that the reproductive phase is the optimal time window for UAV observing, which provides an effective method for accurate pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice in precision agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing direct-seeded rice yield prediction using UAV-derived features acquired during the reproductive phase\",\"authors\":\"Guodong Yang, Yaxing Li, Shen Yuan, Changzai Zhou, Hongshun Xiang, Zhenqing Zhao, Qiaorong Wei, Qingshan Chen, Shaobing Peng, Le Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice is critical for guiding crop interventions and food security assessment in precision agriculture. Technology advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has provided an unprecedented opportunity to efficiently retrieve crop growth parameters instead of labor-intensive ground measurements. This study is aiming to evaluate the feasibility of fusing multi-temporal UAV-derived features collected at critical phenological stages in forecasting direct-seeded rice yield across different cultivars and nitrogen (N) management. The results showed that RGB sensor-derived canopy volume, canopy coverage, and spectral features including RBRI, WI etc., were identified to be most sensitive to the differences in aboveground biomass and grain yield. Heading stage was the suitable time for estimating yield performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75) for mono-temporal UAV observation. By contrast, multi-temporal features fusion could remarkably enhance the yield prediction accuracy. Moreover, the yield prediction accuracy can be further improved by integrating UAV features collected at panicle initiation and heading stages (i.e., rice reproductive phase) compared to multi-temporal features fusion (R<sup>2</sup> increased from 0.82 to 0.85 and RMSE decreased from 35.1 to 31.5 g m<sup>−2</sup>). This can be attributed to the fact that the biomass accumulation during the reproductive phase was closely associated to the total spikelets and final yield. By using this proposed approach, the predicted yield showed a good spatial consistency with the measured yield across different cultivars and N management, and yield prediction error in the most of the plots (114 of 128 plots) was less than 45 g m<sup>−2</sup>. In summary, this study highlights that the reproductive phase is the optimal time window for UAV observing, which provides an effective method for accurate pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice in precision agriculture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10103-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
直播水稻收获前的产量预测对于指导作物干预和精准农业中的粮食安全评估至关重要。基于无人飞行器(UAV)的遥感技术的进步提供了一个前所未有的机会,可以有效地检索作物生长参数,而不是进行劳动密集型的地面测量。本研究旨在评估融合在关键物候期收集的多时空无人机衍生特征预测不同栽培品种直播水稻产量和氮素(N)管理的可行性。结果表明,从 RGB 传感器获得的冠层体积、冠层覆盖率和光谱特征(包括 RBRI、WI 等)对地上生物量和谷物产量的差异最为敏感。在单时相无人机观测中,穗期是估算产量表现的合适时间(R2 = 0.75)。相比之下,多时相特征融合可显著提高产量预测精度。此外,与多时空特征融合相比,整合在圆锥花序始穗期和抽穗期(即水稻生育期)采集的无人机特征可进一步提高产量预测精度(R2 从 0.82 提高到 0.85,RMSE 从 35.1 g m-2 降低到 31.5 g m-2)。这可能是因为生殖期的生物量积累与总穗数和最终产量密切相关。使用这种方法,在不同栽培品种和氮管理条件下,预测产量与实测产量在空间上表现出良好的一致性,大多数地块(128 块地中的 114 块)的产量预测误差小于 45 g m-2。总之,本研究强调了生育期是无人机观测的最佳时间窗口,为精准农业中直播水稻收获前的精确产量预测提供了有效方法。
Enhancing direct-seeded rice yield prediction using UAV-derived features acquired during the reproductive phase
Pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice is critical for guiding crop interventions and food security assessment in precision agriculture. Technology advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing has provided an unprecedented opportunity to efficiently retrieve crop growth parameters instead of labor-intensive ground measurements. This study is aiming to evaluate the feasibility of fusing multi-temporal UAV-derived features collected at critical phenological stages in forecasting direct-seeded rice yield across different cultivars and nitrogen (N) management. The results showed that RGB sensor-derived canopy volume, canopy coverage, and spectral features including RBRI, WI etc., were identified to be most sensitive to the differences in aboveground biomass and grain yield. Heading stage was the suitable time for estimating yield performance (R2 = 0.75) for mono-temporal UAV observation. By contrast, multi-temporal features fusion could remarkably enhance the yield prediction accuracy. Moreover, the yield prediction accuracy can be further improved by integrating UAV features collected at panicle initiation and heading stages (i.e., rice reproductive phase) compared to multi-temporal features fusion (R2 increased from 0.82 to 0.85 and RMSE decreased from 35.1 to 31.5 g m−2). This can be attributed to the fact that the biomass accumulation during the reproductive phase was closely associated to the total spikelets and final yield. By using this proposed approach, the predicted yield showed a good spatial consistency with the measured yield across different cultivars and N management, and yield prediction error in the most of the plots (114 of 128 plots) was less than 45 g m−2. In summary, this study highlights that the reproductive phase is the optimal time window for UAV observing, which provides an effective method for accurate pre-harvest yield prediction of direct-seeded rice in precision agriculture.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.