新生儿肋骨扩张的实时变化与腹部机械刺激的使用:一项准实验研究。

IF 2
Jaiana Xavier Santos, Pedro Ykaro Fialho Silva, Maria Clara Lima da Cruz, Bianca Fernandes Vasconcelos E Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Silvana Alves Pereira
{"title":"新生儿肋骨扩张的实时变化与腹部机械刺激的使用:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Jaiana Xavier Santos, Pedro Ykaro Fialho Silva, Maria Clara Lima da Cruz, Bianca Fernandes Vasconcelos E Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Silvana Alves Pereira","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in newborns using an abdominal stabilization band.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 32 newborns of both genders, with gestational age between 35 and 41 weeks. The abdominal stabilization band was used for 15 minutes between the xiphoid process and the anterosuperior iliac crest, with an abdominal contention 0.5cm smaller than the abdominal circumference. The rib cage expansion was evaluated by a breathing transducer (Pneumotrace II™) three minutes before using the band, during the use (15 minutes), and ten minutes after removing the band. The Shapiro-Wilk test verified data normality, and the Wilcoxon test compared the variables considering rib cage expansion and respiratory rate. Significance was set to p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an increase in respiratory rate when comparing before and ten minutes after removing (p=0.008) the abdominal stabilization band, as well as when comparing during its use and ten minutes after its removal (p=0.001). There was also an increase in rib cage expansion when comparing before and during the use of the abdominal stabilization band (p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the abdominal stabilization band promoted an increase in the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in the assessed newborns and may be a viable option to improve the respiratory kinematics of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74721,"journal":{"name":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","volume":"42 ","pages":"e2023032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10742371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time changes in rib cage expansion and use of abdominal mechanical stimulation in newborns: a quasi-experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Jaiana Xavier Santos, Pedro Ykaro Fialho Silva, Maria Clara Lima da Cruz, Bianca Fernandes Vasconcelos E Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Silvana Alves Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in newborns using an abdominal stabilization band.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 32 newborns of both genders, with gestational age between 35 and 41 weeks. The abdominal stabilization band was used for 15 minutes between the xiphoid process and the anterosuperior iliac crest, with an abdominal contention 0.5cm smaller than the abdominal circumference. The rib cage expansion was evaluated by a breathing transducer (Pneumotrace II™) three minutes before using the band, during the use (15 minutes), and ten minutes after removing the band. The Shapiro-Wilk test verified data normality, and the Wilcoxon test compared the variables considering rib cage expansion and respiratory rate. Significance was set to p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an increase in respiratory rate when comparing before and ten minutes after removing (p=0.008) the abdominal stabilization band, as well as when comparing during its use and ten minutes after its removal (p=0.001). There was also an increase in rib cage expansion when comparing before and during the use of the abdominal stabilization band (p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the abdominal stabilization band promoted an increase in the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in the assessed newborns and may be a viable option to improve the respiratory kinematics of this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"e2023032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10742371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估使用腹部稳定带的新生儿的肋骨扩张情况和呼吸频率:研究对象包括 32 名新生儿,男女均有,胎龄在 35 至 41 周之间。在剑突和髂前上嵴之间使用腹部稳定带 15 分钟,腹围比腹围小 0.5 厘米。在使用束腹带前三分钟、使用过程中(15 分钟)和取下束腹带后十分钟,用呼吸传感器(Pneumotrace II™)对肋骨扩张情况进行评估。Shapiro-Wilk 检验验证了数据的正态性,Wilcoxon 检验比较了考虑到肋骨扩张和呼吸频率的变量。显著性设定为 p结果:取下腹部稳定带之前和取下腹部稳定带十分钟后比较(p=0.008),以及使用腹部稳定带期间和取下腹部稳定带十分钟后比较(p=0.001),呼吸频率均有所增加。使用腹部稳定带之前和使用腹部稳定带期间相比,肋骨扩张也有所增加(p=0.005):结论:使用腹部稳定带可促进接受评估的新生儿的肋骨扩张和呼吸频率增加,可能是改善这类人群呼吸运动学的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-time changes in rib cage expansion and use of abdominal mechanical stimulation in newborns: a quasi-experimental study.

Real-time changes in rib cage expansion and use of abdominal mechanical stimulation in newborns: a quasi-experimental study.

Real-time changes in rib cage expansion and use of abdominal mechanical stimulation in newborns: a quasi-experimental study.

Objective: To assess the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in newborns using an abdominal stabilization band.

Methods: The study included 32 newborns of both genders, with gestational age between 35 and 41 weeks. The abdominal stabilization band was used for 15 minutes between the xiphoid process and the anterosuperior iliac crest, with an abdominal contention 0.5cm smaller than the abdominal circumference. The rib cage expansion was evaluated by a breathing transducer (Pneumotrace II™) three minutes before using the band, during the use (15 minutes), and ten minutes after removing the band. The Shapiro-Wilk test verified data normality, and the Wilcoxon test compared the variables considering rib cage expansion and respiratory rate. Significance was set to p<0.05.

Results: There was an increase in respiratory rate when comparing before and ten minutes after removing (p=0.008) the abdominal stabilization band, as well as when comparing during its use and ten minutes after its removal (p=0.001). There was also an increase in rib cage expansion when comparing before and during the use of the abdominal stabilization band (p=0.005).

Conclusions: The use of the abdominal stabilization band promoted an increase in the rib cage expansion and respiratory rate in the assessed newborns and may be a viable option to improve the respiratory kinematics of this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信