重量级词汇:探索医生、肥胖症专家和公众样本中有关体重的术语。

Q2 Social Sciences
Oliver W A Wilson, Sarah Nutter, Shelly Russell-Mayhew, John H Ellard, Angela S Alberga, Cara C MacInnis
{"title":"重量级词汇:探索医生、肥胖症专家和公众样本中有关体重的术语。","authors":"Oliver W A Wilson, Sarah Nutter, Shelly Russell-Mayhew, John H Ellard, Angela S Alberga, Cara C MacInnis","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2023.2297122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The words used to refer to weight and individuals with large bodies can be used to reinforce weight stigma. Given that most previous research has examined preferred terminology within homogenous groups, this research sought to examine terminology preferences across populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper reports on data gathered with the general public, family physicians, and obesity researchers/practitioners. Participants were asked about the words they commonly: (1) used to refer to people with large bodies (general public); (2) heard in their professional contexts (physicians and obesity specialists); and (3) perceived to be the most socially or professionally acceptable (all samples).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similarities and differences were evident between samples, especially related to weight-related clinical terms, the word fat, and behavioral stereotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide some clarity into the differences between populations and highlight the need to incorporate use of strategies that may move beyond person-first language to humanize research and clinical practice with people with large bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighty words: exploring terminology about weight among samples of physicians, obesity specialists, and the general public.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver W A Wilson, Sarah Nutter, Shelly Russell-Mayhew, John H Ellard, Angela S Alberga, Cara C MacInnis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2023.2297122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The words used to refer to weight and individuals with large bodies can be used to reinforce weight stigma. Given that most previous research has examined preferred terminology within homogenous groups, this research sought to examine terminology preferences across populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper reports on data gathered with the general public, family physicians, and obesity researchers/practitioners. Participants were asked about the words they commonly: (1) used to refer to people with large bodies (general public); (2) heard in their professional contexts (physicians and obesity specialists); and (3) perceived to be the most socially or professionally acceptable (all samples).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similarities and differences were evident between samples, especially related to weight-related clinical terms, the word fat, and behavioral stereotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide some clarity into the differences between populations and highlight the need to incorporate use of strategies that may move beyond person-first language to humanize research and clinical practice with people with large bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2297122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2297122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用来指代体重和身材高大的人的词汇可能会被用来强化体重耻辱感。鉴于以往的大多数研究都是研究同质群体中的偏好术语,本研究试图研究不同人群的术语偏好:本文报告了从普通大众、家庭医生和肥胖症研究人员/从业人员那里收集到的数据。参与者被问及他们常用的词汇:(1) 用来指代身材高大的人(普通大众);(2) 在专业场合听到的(医生和肥胖症专家);(3) 被认为是社会或专业上最容易接受的(所有样本):结果:不同样本之间存在明显的异同,尤其是在与体重相关的临床用语、"胖 "这个词以及行为定型观念方面:结论:研究结果在一定程度上阐明了不同人群之间的差异,并强调有必要使用超越 "以人为本 "的语言策略,使针对大块头人群的研究和临床实践人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weighty words: exploring terminology about weight among samples of physicians, obesity specialists, and the general public.

Background: The words used to refer to weight and individuals with large bodies can be used to reinforce weight stigma. Given that most previous research has examined preferred terminology within homogenous groups, this research sought to examine terminology preferences across populations.

Methods: This paper reports on data gathered with the general public, family physicians, and obesity researchers/practitioners. Participants were asked about the words they commonly: (1) used to refer to people with large bodies (general public); (2) heard in their professional contexts (physicians and obesity specialists); and (3) perceived to be the most socially or professionally acceptable (all samples).

Results: Similarities and differences were evident between samples, especially related to weight-related clinical terms, the word fat, and behavioral stereotypes.

Conclusion: The results provide some clarity into the differences between populations and highlight the need to incorporate use of strategies that may move beyond person-first language to humanize research and clinical practice with people with large bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信