吸食大麻者社区样本的奖赏学习能力。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1037/pha0000701
Olivia Turner, Kiran Punia, Diego A Pizzagalli, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis
{"title":"吸食大麻者社区样本的奖赏学习能力。","authors":"Olivia Turner, Kiran Punia, Diego A Pizzagalli, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis","doi":"10.1037/pha0000701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use has been linked to deficient reward processing; however, little is known about its relation to the specific construct of reward learning, in which behavior is modified through associating novel stimuli with a positive outcome. The probabilistic reward task was used to objectively evaluate reward learning in 38 individuals who use recreational cannabis and 34 control comparison participants from the community. Reward learning was evidenced by the development of a response bias, which indicates the propensity to modulate behavior as a function of prior reinforcement. Both cannabis and control groups demonstrated reward learning, with no group differences in response bias development. Among cannabis participants, trending significant relationships between greater chronicity, <i>r</i>(36) = -.30, <i>p</i> = .077, self-reported potency, <i>r</i>(19) = -.33, <i>p</i> = .052, and poorer reward learning were found. Nonsignificant relationships were found between reward learning and frequency, age of initiation, weekly quantity or Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) scores (all <i>p</i> > .05). The ability to form noncannabis reward associations is promising for the success of therapeutic interventions for problematic cannabis use; however, indications of severity of use in relation to poorer reward learning suggests a need for a better pharmacological and pharmacokinetic understanding of cannabis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reward learning capacity in a community sample of individuals who use cannabis.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Turner, Kiran Punia, Diego A Pizzagalli, James MacKillop, Iris M Balodis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pha0000701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cannabis use has been linked to deficient reward processing; however, little is known about its relation to the specific construct of reward learning, in which behavior is modified through associating novel stimuli with a positive outcome. The probabilistic reward task was used to objectively evaluate reward learning in 38 individuals who use recreational cannabis and 34 control comparison participants from the community. Reward learning was evidenced by the development of a response bias, which indicates the propensity to modulate behavior as a function of prior reinforcement. Both cannabis and control groups demonstrated reward learning, with no group differences in response bias development. Among cannabis participants, trending significant relationships between greater chronicity, <i>r</i>(36) = -.30, <i>p</i> = .077, self-reported potency, <i>r</i>(19) = -.33, <i>p</i> = .052, and poorer reward learning were found. Nonsignificant relationships were found between reward learning and frequency, age of initiation, weekly quantity or Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) scores (all <i>p</i> > .05). The ability to form noncannabis reward associations is promising for the success of therapeutic interventions for problematic cannabis use; however, indications of severity of use in relation to poorer reward learning suggests a need for a better pharmacological and pharmacokinetic understanding of cannabis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000701\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸食大麻与奖赏处理缺陷有关;然而,人们对其与奖赏学习这一特定结构的关系知之甚少,在奖赏学习中,通过将新刺激与积极结果联系起来来改变行为。我们使用概率奖励任务对 38 名使用娱乐性大麻的人和 34 名来自社区的对照组参与者的奖励学习进行了客观评估。奖赏学习表现为反应偏差的产生,这表明行为倾向于根据先前的强化作用进行调节。大麻组和对照组都表现出了奖赏学习,在反应偏差发展方面没有组间差异。在大麻参与者中,发现长期吸食大麻(r(36) = -.30,p = .077)、自我报告药效(r(19) = -.33,p = .052)与奖赏学习较差之间存在趋势性显著关系。奖励学习与频率、开始吸食年龄、每周吸食量或大麻使用障碍鉴定测试-修订版(CUDIT-R)得分之间的关系均不显著(均 p > .05)。形成非大麻奖赏联想的能力有望使针对问题大麻使用的治疗干预取得成功;然而,使用大麻的严重程度与较差的奖赏学习有关的迹象表明,需要更好地了解大麻的药理学和药代动力学。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reward learning capacity in a community sample of individuals who use cannabis.

Cannabis use has been linked to deficient reward processing; however, little is known about its relation to the specific construct of reward learning, in which behavior is modified through associating novel stimuli with a positive outcome. The probabilistic reward task was used to objectively evaluate reward learning in 38 individuals who use recreational cannabis and 34 control comparison participants from the community. Reward learning was evidenced by the development of a response bias, which indicates the propensity to modulate behavior as a function of prior reinforcement. Both cannabis and control groups demonstrated reward learning, with no group differences in response bias development. Among cannabis participants, trending significant relationships between greater chronicity, r(36) = -.30, p = .077, self-reported potency, r(19) = -.33, p = .052, and poorer reward learning were found. Nonsignificant relationships were found between reward learning and frequency, age of initiation, weekly quantity or Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) scores (all p > .05). The ability to form noncannabis reward associations is promising for the success of therapeutic interventions for problematic cannabis use; however, indications of severity of use in relation to poorer reward learning suggests a need for a better pharmacological and pharmacokinetic understanding of cannabis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信