Rohin K Reddy, James P Howard, Yousif Ahmad, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Florentina A Simader, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Keenan Saleh, Akriti Naraen, Jack W Samways, George Katritsis, Jagdeep S Mohal, Nandita Kaza, Bradley Porter, Daniel Keene, Nicholas Wf Linton, Darrel P Francis, Zachary I Whinnett, Vishal Luther, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Ahran D Arnold
{"title":"心肌梗死后室性心动过速的导管消融:随机对照试验的个体患者数据 Meta 分析。","authors":"Rohin K Reddy, James P Howard, Yousif Ahmad, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Florentina A Simader, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Keenan Saleh, Akriti Naraen, Jack W Samways, George Katritsis, Jagdeep S Mohal, Nandita Kaza, Bradley Porter, Daniel Keene, Nicholas Wf Linton, Darrel P Francis, Zachary I Whinnett, Vishal Luther, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Ahran D Arnold","doi":"10.15420/aer.2023.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic impact of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation is an important outstanding research question. We undertook a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing ablation to medical therapy in patients developing VT after MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically identified all trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. The prespecified primary endpoint was reconstructed individual patient assessment of all-cause mortality. Prespecified secondary endpoints included trial-level assessment of all-cause mortality, VT recurrence or defibrillator shocks and all-cause hospitalisations. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed for ablation approaches involving only substrate modification without VT activation mapping. Sensitivity analyses were performed depending on the proportion of patients with prior MI included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials, recruiting a total of 874 patients, were included. Of these 874 patients, 430 were randomised to catheter ablation and 444 were randomised to medical therapy. Catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy when synthesising individual patient data (HR 0.63; 95% CI [0.41-0.96]; p=0.03), but not in trial-level analysis (RR 0.91; 95% CI [0.67-1.23]; p=0.53; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Catheter ablation significantly reduced VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and hospitalisations compared with medical therapy. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with postinfarct VT, catheter ablation reduces mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"12 ","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia After MI: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Rohin K Reddy, James P Howard, Yousif Ahmad, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Florentina A Simader, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Keenan Saleh, Akriti Naraen, Jack W Samways, George Katritsis, Jagdeep S Mohal, Nandita Kaza, Bradley Porter, Daniel Keene, Nicholas Wf Linton, Darrel P Francis, Zachary I Whinnett, Vishal Luther, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Ahran D Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/aer.2023.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic impact of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation is an important outstanding research question. We undertook a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing ablation to medical therapy in patients developing VT after MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically identified all trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. The prespecified primary endpoint was reconstructed individual patient assessment of all-cause mortality. Prespecified secondary endpoints included trial-level assessment of all-cause mortality, VT recurrence or defibrillator shocks and all-cause hospitalisations. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed for ablation approaches involving only substrate modification without VT activation mapping. Sensitivity analyses were performed depending on the proportion of patients with prior MI included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials, recruiting a total of 874 patients, were included. Of these 874 patients, 430 were randomised to catheter ablation and 444 were randomised to medical therapy. Catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy when synthesising individual patient data (HR 0.63; 95% CI [0.41-0.96]; p=0.03), but not in trial-level analysis (RR 0.91; 95% CI [0.67-1.23]; p=0.53; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Catheter ablation significantly reduced VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and hospitalisations compared with medical therapy. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with postinfarct VT, catheter ablation reduces mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2023.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2023.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:室性心动过速(VT)导管消融对预后的影响是一个尚未解决的重要研究问题。我们对心肌梗死后发生室速的患者进行了随机对照试验,比较了消融与药物治疗,并对这些试验的单个患者数据进行了重建荟萃分析:我们系统地确定了所有对既往有心肌梗死的 VT 患者进行导管消融与药物治疗比较的试验。预设的主要终点是患者个人对全因死亡率的重建评估。预设的次要终点包括全因死亡率、VT 复发或除颤器电击以及全因住院的试验水平评估。对于只涉及基质改变而不涉及 VT 激活图谱的消融方法,进行了预先指定的亚组分析。根据纳入的既往有心肌梗死的患者比例进行了敏感性分析:结果:共纳入了八项试验,招募了 874 名患者。在这874名患者中,430人被随机分配接受导管消融治疗,444人被随机分配接受药物治疗。与药物治疗相比,导管消融术降低了全因死亡率(HR 0.63;95% CI [0.41-0.96];P=0.03),但在试验层面的分析中却没有降低(RR 0.91;95% CI [0.67-1.23];P=0.53;I2=0%)。与药物治疗相比,导管消融大大降低了VT复发率、除颤器电击率和住院率。敏感性分析结果与主要分析结果一致:导管消融术可降低梗死后 VT 患者的死亡率。
Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia After MI: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Background: The prognostic impact of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation is an important outstanding research question. We undertook a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing ablation to medical therapy in patients developing VT after MI.
Methods: We systematically identified all trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. The prespecified primary endpoint was reconstructed individual patient assessment of all-cause mortality. Prespecified secondary endpoints included trial-level assessment of all-cause mortality, VT recurrence or defibrillator shocks and all-cause hospitalisations. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed for ablation approaches involving only substrate modification without VT activation mapping. Sensitivity analyses were performed depending on the proportion of patients with prior MI included.
Results: Eight trials, recruiting a total of 874 patients, were included. Of these 874 patients, 430 were randomised to catheter ablation and 444 were randomised to medical therapy. Catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy when synthesising individual patient data (HR 0.63; 95% CI [0.41-0.96]; p=0.03), but not in trial-level analysis (RR 0.91; 95% CI [0.67-1.23]; p=0.53; I2=0%). Catheter ablation significantly reduced VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and hospitalisations compared with medical therapy. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses.
Conclusion: In patients with postinfarct VT, catheter ablation reduces mortality.