虚伪指责的好与坏

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Utilitas Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1017/s0953820823000274
Kartik Upadhyaya
{"title":"虚伪指责的好与坏","authors":"Kartik Upadhyaya","doi":"10.1017/s0953820823000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified; but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. Hypocrisy undermines this process of <span>mutual deliberation</span>. Thus, even if better than silence, hypocritical blaming is second-best, and that is why it is wrong.</p>","PeriodicalId":45896,"journal":{"name":"Utilitas","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming\",\"authors\":\"Kartik Upadhyaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0953820823000274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified; but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. Hypocrisy undermines this process of <span>mutual deliberation</span>. Thus, even if better than silence, hypocritical blaming is second-best, and that is why it is wrong.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilitas\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820823000274\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820823000274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果我们准确地指责他人,那么即使我们自己也有类似的错误行为,指责他们在道德上是否正确?一方面,虚伪的指责似乎在道德上是错误的,也是不合理的;但另一方面,即使是虚伪的指责似乎也比沉默要好。我对虚伪指责的错误性进行了阐述,从而解决了这一明显的两难问题。在追究他人的道德过失时,我们应该愿意与他们一起推理我们自己的类似过失。虚伪破坏了这一相互商讨的过程。因此,虚伪的指责即使比沉默好,也是退而求其次,这就是为什么它是错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming

Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified; but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. Hypocrisy undermines this process of mutual deliberation. Thus, even if better than silence, hypocritical blaming is second-best, and that is why it is wrong.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilitas
Utilitas PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信