了解经济学混合课堂:案例研究

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jonathan L. Graves , Emrul Hasan , Trish L. Varao-Sousa
{"title":"了解经济学混合课堂:案例研究","authors":"Jonathan L. Graves ,&nbsp;Emrul Hasan ,&nbsp;Trish L. Varao-Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental </span>pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the hybrid classroom in economics: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan L. Graves ,&nbsp;Emrul Hasan ,&nbsp;Trish L. Varao-Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental </span>pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388023000233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388023000233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了在 2021 年夏季采用混合(在线和面对面)教学形式讲授的中级计量经济学课程中,在线学生和面对面学生("队列")之间的差异。我们将这门课程设计为实验性试点课程,采用讲座、实验和实践活动相结合的方式,研究混合教学是否一定会使一组学生(如面授学生)比另一组学生(如在线学生)更有优势。我们特别想知道,是否可以通过课程设计的选择和互动学习活动的使用来减少差异。我们发现,我们的设计为学生带来了普遍非常积极的体验--在线学习和面对面学习的学生在情感体验上没有差异。我们确实发现,在参与度和同伴评价方面存在一些微小的差异,这对面对面学习的学生有利,但在总体学业成绩方面没有差异。我们的结论是,本案例研究表明,如果课程和教学大纲设计得当,某些形式的混合学习并不一定对在线学生不利。我们还为寻求调整、复制或扩展我们的方法的教育工作者提供了范例和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the hybrid classroom in economics: A case study

In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信