通过实施多组分方案减少重症监护室获得性虚弱:准实验临床试验

Nelson Darío Giraldo, Carlos Carvajal, Fabián Muñoz, María de Pilar Restrepo, Michael Andrés García, Juan Miguel Arias, José Leonardo Mojica, Juan Carlos Torres, Álex García, Diego Muñoz, Francia Cecilia Rodríguez, Jorge Arias, Lina María Mejía, Gisela De La Rosa
{"title":"通过实施多组分方案减少重症监护室获得性虚弱:准实验临床试验","authors":"Nelson Darío Giraldo, Carlos Carvajal, Fabián Muñoz, María de Pilar Restrepo, Michael Andrés García, Juan Miguel Arias, José Leonardo Mojica, Juan Carlos Torres, Álex García, Diego Muñoz, Francia Cecilia Rodríguez, Jorge Arias, Lina María Mejía, Gisela De La Rosa","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.6947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness is a frequent complication that affects the prognosis of critical illness during hospital stay and after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if a multicomponent protocol of early active mobility involving adequate pain control, non-sedation, non-pharmacologic delirium prevention, cognitive stimulation, and family support, reduces intensive care unit-acquired weakness at the moment of discharge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We carried out a non-randomized clinical trial in two mixed intensive care units in a high-complexity hospital, including patients over 14 years old with invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We compared the intervention –the multicomponent protocol– during intensive care hospitalization versus the standard care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 82 patients in the intervention group and 106 in the control group. Muscle weakness acquired in the intensive care unit at the moment of discharge was less frequent in the intervention group (41.3% versus 78.9%, p<0.00001). The mobility score at intensive unit care discharge was better in the intervention group (median = 3.5 versus 2, p < 0.0138). There were no statistically significant differences in the invasive mechanical ventilation-free days at day 28 (18 versus 15 days, p<0.49), and neither in the mortality (18.2 versus 27.3%, p<0.167).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multi-component protocol of early active mobility significantly reduces intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness at the moment of discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10826465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrease in the intensive care unit-acquired weakness with a multicomponent protocol implementation: A quasi-experimental clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Nelson Darío Giraldo, Carlos Carvajal, Fabián Muñoz, María de Pilar Restrepo, Michael Andrés García, Juan Miguel Arias, José Leonardo Mojica, Juan Carlos Torres, Álex García, Diego Muñoz, Francia Cecilia Rodríguez, Jorge Arias, Lina María Mejía, Gisela De La Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.7705/biomedica.6947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness is a frequent complication that affects the prognosis of critical illness during hospital stay and after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if a multicomponent protocol of early active mobility involving adequate pain control, non-sedation, non-pharmacologic delirium prevention, cognitive stimulation, and family support, reduces intensive care unit-acquired weakness at the moment of discharge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We carried out a non-randomized clinical trial in two mixed intensive care units in a high-complexity hospital, including patients over 14 years old with invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We compared the intervention –the multicomponent protocol– during intensive care hospitalization versus the standard care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 82 patients in the intervention group and 106 in the control group. Muscle weakness acquired in the intensive care unit at the moment of discharge was less frequent in the intervention group (41.3% versus 78.9%, p<0.00001). The mobility score at intensive unit care discharge was better in the intervention group (median = 3.5 versus 2, p < 0.0138). There were no statistically significant differences in the invasive mechanical ventilation-free days at day 28 (18 versus 15 days, p<0.49), and neither in the mortality (18.2 versus 27.3%, p<0.167).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multi-component protocol of early active mobility significantly reduces intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness at the moment of discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10826465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.6947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.6947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:重症监护室获得性乏力是一种常见并发症,会影响危重病人住院期间和出院后的预后:重症监护室获得性乏力是一种常见并发症,会影响危重病人住院期间和出院后的预后:目的:确定早期主动移动的多组分方案,包括充分的疼痛控制、非镇静、非药物谵妄预防、认知刺激和家庭支持,是否能减少重症监护室获得性乏力在出院时的发生:我们在一家高复杂性医院的两个混合重症监护病房开展了一项非随机临床试验,对象包括使用有创机械通气超过 48 小时的 14 岁以上患者。我们将重症监护住院期间的干预措施(多组分方案)与标准护理进行了比较:我们对干预组的 82 名患者和对照组的 106 名患者进行了分析。干预组患者出院时在重症监护室出现肌无力的比例较低(41.3% 对 78.9%,p):早期主动活动的多组分方案可显著减少重症监护室患者出院时出现的肌无力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decrease in the intensive care unit-acquired weakness with a multicomponent protocol implementation: A quasi-experimental clinical trial

Introduction: Intensive care unit-acquired weakness is a frequent complication that affects the prognosis of critical illness during hospital stay and after hospital discharge.

Objectives: To determine if a multicomponent protocol of early active mobility involving adequate pain control, non-sedation, non-pharmacologic delirium prevention, cognitive stimulation, and family support, reduces intensive care unit-acquired weakness at the moment of discharge.

Materials and methods: We carried out a non-randomized clinical trial in two mixed intensive care units in a high-complexity hospital, including patients over 14 years old with invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We compared the intervention –the multicomponent protocol– during intensive care hospitalization versus the standard care.

Results: We analyzed 82 patients in the intervention group and 106 in the control group. Muscle weakness acquired in the intensive care unit at the moment of discharge was less frequent in the intervention group (41.3% versus 78.9%, p<0.00001). The mobility score at intensive unit care discharge was better in the intervention group (median = 3.5 versus 2, p < 0.0138). There were no statistically significant differences in the invasive mechanical ventilation-free days at day 28 (18 versus 15 days, p<0.49), and neither in the mortality (18.2 versus 27.3%, p<0.167).

Conclusion: A multi-component protocol of early active mobility significantly reduces intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness at the moment of discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信