M Penicaud, S Cammilleri, R Giorgi, J J Grob, Taïeb D, A Giovanni, P Dessi, N Fakhry
{"title":"头颈部黑色素瘤的前哨淋巴结活检:单机构分析。","authors":"M Penicaud, S Cammilleri, R Giorgi, J J Grob, Taïeb D, A Giovanni, P Dessi, N Fakhry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of our study was to analyze a series of patients from our institution who underwent surgery for head and neck cutaneous melanoma and who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-center observational cohort of 120 head and neck melanoma patients was investigated from 2002 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 107 patients (89.2%) with lymph node identified during lymphoscintigraphy, at least one node was collected and analyzed in 96 patients (90.6%). A positive sentinel lymph node was found in 9.4% of patients. Our data showed higher failure rate of lymphoscintigraphic identification (11.7%), lower rate of SLN positivity (9.4%), and higher false-negative rate of SLNB (24.1%) than the usualfigures established for malignant melanomas in other locations. After a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the positive SLN group was 53% vs 75% for the negative SLN after 2 years of follow-up and 53% vs 48% after 5 years (p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The complexity of lymphatic drainage and the anatomy of the cervical region probably accounts for a specificities which result in a lower predictive value of SLNB in head and neck melanoma than in MM in other locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":76469,"journal":{"name":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","volume":"135 3","pages":"115-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma: A single institution analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Penicaud, S Cammilleri, R Giorgi, J J Grob, Taïeb D, A Giovanni, P Dessi, N Fakhry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of our study was to analyze a series of patients from our institution who underwent surgery for head and neck cutaneous melanoma and who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-center observational cohort of 120 head and neck melanoma patients was investigated from 2002 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 107 patients (89.2%) with lymph node identified during lymphoscintigraphy, at least one node was collected and analyzed in 96 patients (90.6%). A positive sentinel lymph node was found in 9.4% of patients. Our data showed higher failure rate of lymphoscintigraphic identification (11.7%), lower rate of SLN positivity (9.4%), and higher false-negative rate of SLNB (24.1%) than the usualfigures established for malignant melanomas in other locations. After a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the positive SLN group was 53% vs 75% for the negative SLN after 2 years of follow-up and 53% vs 48% after 5 years (p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The complexity of lymphatic drainage and the anatomy of the cervical region probably accounts for a specificities which result in a lower predictive value of SLNB in head and neck melanoma than in MM in other locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie\",\"volume\":\"135 3\",\"pages\":\"115-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma: A single institution analysis.
Introduction: The aim of our study was to analyze a series of patients from our institution who underwent surgery for head and neck cutaneous melanoma and who received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).
Material and methods: A single-center observational cohort of 120 head and neck melanoma patients was investigated from 2002 to 2011.
Results: Among the 107 patients (89.2%) with lymph node identified during lymphoscintigraphy, at least one node was collected and analyzed in 96 patients (90.6%). A positive sentinel lymph node was found in 9.4% of patients. Our data showed higher failure rate of lymphoscintigraphic identification (11.7%), lower rate of SLN positivity (9.4%), and higher false-negative rate of SLNB (24.1%) than the usualfigures established for malignant melanomas in other locations. After a mean follow-up of 38.1 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the positive SLN group was 53% vs 75% for the negative SLN after 2 years of follow-up and 53% vs 48% after 5 years (p = 0.44).
Conclusion: The complexity of lymphatic drainage and the anatomy of the cervical region probably accounts for a specificities which result in a lower predictive value of SLNB in head and neck melanoma than in MM in other locations.