直肠癌患者淋巴管和神经周围受侵的发生率及其对生存期的影响

Shqipe Misimi, Dajana Cako, Ali İlbey Demirel, Andrej Nikolovski, Cemal Ulusoy, Mehmet Güray Duman
{"title":"直肠癌患者淋巴管和神经周围受侵的发生率及其对生存期的影响","authors":"Shqipe Misimi, Dajana Cako, Ali İlbey Demirel, Andrej Nikolovski, Cemal Ulusoy, Mehmet Güray Duman","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2023-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) and Perineural Invasion (PNI) represent undesirable but still realistic pathological features of rectal cancer, associated with poor prognosis and worse survival. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LVI and PNI in patients treated for rectal cancer and the impact of LVI and PNI on patient survival. <b>Material and Methods</b>: This retrospective single center observational study, conducted in the period of 2016-2019, includes patients with rectal cancer treated with/without long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Data collection encompassed demographics, tumor characteristics, type of surgery (abdominal perineal rectal resection - APR and low anterior rectal resection - LAR), and LVI/PNI presence. Survival during follow-up was estimated and compared for patients with/without LVI and PNI involvement. <b>Results</b>: A total number of 234 patients (77 females and 157 males) with mean age of 61.3 enrolled in the study. Neoadjuvant CRT was conducted in 170 patients. APR procedure was performed in 67 of them and LAR in 167. LVI presence was noted in 55 (24.4%) and PNI in 77 (34.2%) patients. Mean survival during follow-up was 42.07 months. The use of nCRT influenced on survival (p < 0.033). Patients treated with LAR had better survival outcomes (p = 0.001). Presence of LVI and PNI was associated with a worse prognosis (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>: PNI was more frequent than the LVI in this study. Patients with nCRT conduction had better overall survival. LVI and PNI presence was associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival in patients with rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":74492,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","volume":"44 3","pages":"73-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Incidence of Lymphovascular and Perineural Invasion and their Impact on Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shqipe Misimi, Dajana Cako, Ali İlbey Demirel, Andrej Nikolovski, Cemal Ulusoy, Mehmet Güray Duman\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/prilozi-2023-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) and Perineural Invasion (PNI) represent undesirable but still realistic pathological features of rectal cancer, associated with poor prognosis and worse survival. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LVI and PNI in patients treated for rectal cancer and the impact of LVI and PNI on patient survival. <b>Material and Methods</b>: This retrospective single center observational study, conducted in the period of 2016-2019, includes patients with rectal cancer treated with/without long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Data collection encompassed demographics, tumor characteristics, type of surgery (abdominal perineal rectal resection - APR and low anterior rectal resection - LAR), and LVI/PNI presence. Survival during follow-up was estimated and compared for patients with/without LVI and PNI involvement. <b>Results</b>: A total number of 234 patients (77 females and 157 males) with mean age of 61.3 enrolled in the study. Neoadjuvant CRT was conducted in 170 patients. APR procedure was performed in 67 of them and LAR in 167. LVI presence was noted in 55 (24.4%) and PNI in 77 (34.2%) patients. Mean survival during follow-up was 42.07 months. The use of nCRT influenced on survival (p < 0.033). Patients treated with LAR had better survival outcomes (p = 0.001). Presence of LVI and PNI was associated with a worse prognosis (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>: PNI was more frequent than the LVI in this study. Patients with nCRT conduction had better overall survival. LVI and PNI presence was associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival in patients with rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"73-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2023-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2023-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:淋巴管侵犯(LVI)和神经周围侵犯(PNI)是直肠癌的不良病理特征,但仍是现实存在的病理特征,与不良预后和更差的生存率有关。本研究旨在评估直肠癌患者中 LVI 和 PNI 的发生率,以及 LVI 和 PNI 对患者生存的影响。材料与方法:这项回顾性单中心观察研究于 2016-2019 年间进行,研究对象包括接受/未接受长程新辅助化放疗(nCRT)治疗的直肠癌患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、手术类型(腹会阴直肠切除术--APR和低位前直肠切除术--LAR)以及是否存在LVI/PNI。对随访期间的存活率进行了估算,并对有/无LVI和PNI累及的患者进行了比较。结果:共有 234 名患者(77 名女性和 157 名男性)参加了研究,平均年龄为 61.3 岁。170名患者接受了新辅助CRT治疗。其中67人进行了APR手术,167人进行了LAR手术。55例(24.4%)患者出现LVI,77例(34.2%)患者出现PNI。随访期间的平均生存期为 42.07 个月。nCRT的使用对生存期有影响(p < 0.033)。接受LAR治疗的患者生存率更高(p = 0.001)。LVI和PNI的存在与较差的预后有关(p < 0.001)。结论在本研究中,PNI的发生率高于LVI。接受 nCRT 治疗的患者总生存率更高。就总生存率而言,LVI和PNI的存在与直肠癌患者的不良预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Incidence of Lymphovascular and Perineural Invasion and their Impact on Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

Aim: Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) and Perineural Invasion (PNI) represent undesirable but still realistic pathological features of rectal cancer, associated with poor prognosis and worse survival. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LVI and PNI in patients treated for rectal cancer and the impact of LVI and PNI on patient survival. Material and Methods: This retrospective single center observational study, conducted in the period of 2016-2019, includes patients with rectal cancer treated with/without long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Data collection encompassed demographics, tumor characteristics, type of surgery (abdominal perineal rectal resection - APR and low anterior rectal resection - LAR), and LVI/PNI presence. Survival during follow-up was estimated and compared for patients with/without LVI and PNI involvement. Results: A total number of 234 patients (77 females and 157 males) with mean age of 61.3 enrolled in the study. Neoadjuvant CRT was conducted in 170 patients. APR procedure was performed in 67 of them and LAR in 167. LVI presence was noted in 55 (24.4%) and PNI in 77 (34.2%) patients. Mean survival during follow-up was 42.07 months. The use of nCRT influenced on survival (p < 0.033). Patients treated with LAR had better survival outcomes (p = 0.001). Presence of LVI and PNI was associated with a worse prognosis (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PNI was more frequent than the LVI in this study. Patients with nCRT conduction had better overall survival. LVI and PNI presence was associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival in patients with rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信