{"title":"在 COVID-19 期间接受和未接受言语治疗的唇腭裂青少年的生活质量。","authors":"Zahra Moshtaghi Fard, Samira Aghadoost, Negin Moradi, Sarvin Sarmadi, Farnoosh Mohammadi, Naghmeh Bahrami","doi":"10.1177/10556656231219413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCleft-related speech concerns can affect the quality of life (QOL) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in-person speech therapy (ST) was restricted due to fear of getting infected. This study aimed to compare QOL in patients with CLP with and without ST during the pandemic.DesignCross-sectional StudySettingCLP team at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).Patients/ParticipantsThirty-six CLP subjects with a mean age of 17.33 ± 4 years participated in two groups, including with and without ST. Fifteen subjects had cleft palate only (CPO) and others had CLP.InterventionsST group received at least 10 ST sessions, and group without ST didn't receive ST during COVID-19.Main Outcome Measure(s)A virtual link of demographic and QOL adolescent cleft (QoLAdoCleft) questionnaires were sent to fill out. Results were extracted and transferred to SPSS.ResultsTotal and subscales' scores of QoLAdoCleft were lower in ST group than without ST but differences between them weren't statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05). Furthermore, according to cleft type, there weren't any statistically significant differences in total, physical, and social subscales of QoLAdoCleft (<i>P</i> > .05); however, psychological subscale in CLP had a higher significant score than CPO (<i>P</i> < .05).ConclusionsQOL was weak in all patients with CLP, and receiving/not receiving ST couldn't make noticeable differences between them. It seems; COVID-19 pandemic can have an adverse effect on these results. Also, subjects with CLP had weaker psychological than CPO due to negative psychosocial feedback related to Orofacial deformities received from society.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"665-675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cleft Lip and Palate with and Without Speech Therapy During COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Moshtaghi Fard, Samira Aghadoost, Negin Moradi, Sarvin Sarmadi, Farnoosh Mohammadi, Naghmeh Bahrami\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231219413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveCleft-related speech concerns can affect the quality of life (QOL) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in-person speech therapy (ST) was restricted due to fear of getting infected. This study aimed to compare QOL in patients with CLP with and without ST during the pandemic.DesignCross-sectional StudySettingCLP team at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).Patients/ParticipantsThirty-six CLP subjects with a mean age of 17.33 ± 4 years participated in two groups, including with and without ST. Fifteen subjects had cleft palate only (CPO) and others had CLP.InterventionsST group received at least 10 ST sessions, and group without ST didn't receive ST during COVID-19.Main Outcome Measure(s)A virtual link of demographic and QOL adolescent cleft (QoLAdoCleft) questionnaires were sent to fill out. Results were extracted and transferred to SPSS.ResultsTotal and subscales' scores of QoLAdoCleft were lower in ST group than without ST but differences between them weren't statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05). Furthermore, according to cleft type, there weren't any statistically significant differences in total, physical, and social subscales of QoLAdoCleft (<i>P</i> > .05); however, psychological subscale in CLP had a higher significant score than CPO (<i>P</i> < .05).ConclusionsQOL was weak in all patients with CLP, and receiving/not receiving ST couldn't make noticeable differences between them. It seems; COVID-19 pandemic can have an adverse effect on these results. Also, subjects with CLP had weaker psychological than CPO due to negative psychosocial feedback related to Orofacial deformities received from society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"665-675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231219413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231219413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:与唇腭裂相关的言语问题会影响唇腭裂(CLP)患者的生活质量(QOL)。在 2019 年冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)期间,由于担心受到感染,当面言语治疗(ST)受到了限制。本研究旨在比较大流行期间接受和未接受言语治疗的唇腭裂患者的 QOL:横断面研究:德黑兰医科大学(TUMS)CLP小组:36 名平均年龄为(17.33 ± 4)岁的 CLP 受试者分为两组,包括有 ST 和无 ST 两组。15名受试者仅患有腭裂(CPO),其他受试者患有CLP:干预措施:在 COVID-19 期间,ST 组接受至少 10 次 ST 治疗,无 ST 组不接受 ST 治疗:主要结果测量:发送人口统计学和青少年裂隙QOL(QoLAdoCleft)问卷的虚拟链接,要求填写。提取结果并将其转入 SPSS:结果:ST 组的 QoLAdoCleft 总分和分量表得分均低于无 ST 组,但两者之间的差异无统计学意义(P > .05)。此外,根据裂隙类型,QoLAdoCleft 的总分、身体分量表和社会分量表的差异均无统计学意义(P > .05);但 CLP 的心理分量表的显著得分高于 CPO(P 结论:所有裂隙患者的 QOL 均较弱:所有 CLP 患者的 QOL 均较弱,接受/不接受 ST 对他们的影响并不明显。看来,COVID-19 大流行会对这些结果产生不利影响。此外,由于社会对口腔畸形的负面社会心理反馈,CLP 患者的心理状况要弱于 CPO 患者。
Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cleft Lip and Palate with and Without Speech Therapy During COVID-19.
ObjectiveCleft-related speech concerns can affect the quality of life (QOL) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in-person speech therapy (ST) was restricted due to fear of getting infected. This study aimed to compare QOL in patients with CLP with and without ST during the pandemic.DesignCross-sectional StudySettingCLP team at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).Patients/ParticipantsThirty-six CLP subjects with a mean age of 17.33 ± 4 years participated in two groups, including with and without ST. Fifteen subjects had cleft palate only (CPO) and others had CLP.InterventionsST group received at least 10 ST sessions, and group without ST didn't receive ST during COVID-19.Main Outcome Measure(s)A virtual link of demographic and QOL adolescent cleft (QoLAdoCleft) questionnaires were sent to fill out. Results were extracted and transferred to SPSS.ResultsTotal and subscales' scores of QoLAdoCleft were lower in ST group than without ST but differences between them weren't statistically significant (P > .05). Furthermore, according to cleft type, there weren't any statistically significant differences in total, physical, and social subscales of QoLAdoCleft (P > .05); however, psychological subscale in CLP had a higher significant score than CPO (P < .05).ConclusionsQOL was weak in all patients with CLP, and receiving/not receiving ST couldn't make noticeable differences between them. It seems; COVID-19 pandemic can have an adverse effect on these results. Also, subjects with CLP had weaker psychological than CPO due to negative psychosocial feedback related to Orofacial deformities received from society.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.