临界值通知:尼日利亚全国临床实验室实践调查。

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249
Lucius C Imoh, Idris Y Mohammed, Ifeyinwa D Nnakenyi, Ephraim U Egbuagha, Tomisin M Adaja, Chinelo P Onyenekwu
{"title":"临界值通知:尼日利亚全国临床实验室实践调查。","authors":"Lucius C Imoh, Idris Y Mohammed, Ifeyinwa D Nnakenyi, Ephraim U Egbuagha, Tomisin M Adaja, Chinelo P Onyenekwu","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical value notification (CVN) entails notifying doctors or other laboratory users of aberrant laboratory results that threaten the patient's life and of any values for which reporting delays could negatively impact the patient's health. Critical value notification practices in clinical laboratories in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a nationwide survey to obtain baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among purposively selected secondary- and tertiary-tier, public and private clinical laboratories across northern and southern Nigeria between October 2015 and December 2015. Consenting senior laboratory staff completed and returned a structured questionnaire, that gathered data on respondents' demographics, designations, and institutional characteristics and practices regarding CVN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-four laboratories responded to the questionnaires. Only 69 (51.5 %) laboratories practised CVN; only 23 (33.3%) had existing written policies guiding the practice. Most (43; 62.3%) laboratories use similar critical values (CVs) for adult and paediatric populations. Most laboratories (27; 39.1%) obtained their CVs by combining published literature and local opinions from stakeholders. Physical dispatch (42; 60.9%) followed by telephone calls (38; 55.1%) were the most common means of notification. Private laboratories, compared with public hospital laboratories, were likelier to have separate paediatric CV lists (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and practise telephone notifications (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Critical value notification practices vary and are often suboptimal in many clinical laboratories in Nigeria, which is exacerbated by the absence of guiding policies and national recommendations for post-analytical procedures.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study provides baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories. The study explores the causes of practice variations that can serve as a foundation for enhancing critical reporting and post-analytical services, particularly in clinical laboratories in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"2249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical values notification: A nationwide survey of practices among clinical laboratories across Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Lucius C Imoh, Idris Y Mohammed, Ifeyinwa D Nnakenyi, Ephraim U Egbuagha, Tomisin M Adaja, Chinelo P Onyenekwu\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical value notification (CVN) entails notifying doctors or other laboratory users of aberrant laboratory results that threaten the patient's life and of any values for which reporting delays could negatively impact the patient's health. Critical value notification practices in clinical laboratories in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a nationwide survey to obtain baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among purposively selected secondary- and tertiary-tier, public and private clinical laboratories across northern and southern Nigeria between October 2015 and December 2015. Consenting senior laboratory staff completed and returned a structured questionnaire, that gathered data on respondents' demographics, designations, and institutional characteristics and practices regarding CVN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-four laboratories responded to the questionnaires. Only 69 (51.5 %) laboratories practised CVN; only 23 (33.3%) had existing written policies guiding the practice. Most (43; 62.3%) laboratories use similar critical values (CVs) for adult and paediatric populations. Most laboratories (27; 39.1%) obtained their CVs by combining published literature and local opinions from stakeholders. Physical dispatch (42; 60.9%) followed by telephone calls (38; 55.1%) were the most common means of notification. Private laboratories, compared with public hospital laboratories, were likelier to have separate paediatric CV lists (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and practise telephone notifications (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Critical value notification practices vary and are often suboptimal in many clinical laboratories in Nigeria, which is exacerbated by the absence of guiding policies and national recommendations for post-analytical procedures.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study provides baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories. The study explores the causes of practice variations that can serve as a foundation for enhancing critical reporting and post-analytical services, particularly in clinical laboratories in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"2249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临界值通知(CVN)是指将危及患者生命的异常化验结果通知医生或其他化验室使用者,以及将报告延误可能对患者健康产生负面影响的任何数值通知医生或其他化验室使用者。尼日利亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区临床实验室的临界值通知做法大多不为人知:我们在全国范围内开展了一项调查,以获得尼日利亚实验室临界值通报实践的基线信息:这项横断面研究于 2015 年 10 月至 2015 年 12 月期间在尼日利亚北部和南部有目的地选择了二级和三级、公立和私立临床实验室进行。经同意的高级实验室工作人员填写并交回了一份结构化问卷,该问卷收集了受访者的人口统计学、职称、机构特点以及有关 CVN 的做法等方面的数据:134家实验室对问卷做出了回复。只有 69 家实验室(51.5%)实施了 CVN;只有 23 家实验室(33.3%)制定了指导 CVN 实践的书面政策。大多数实验室(43;62.3%)对成人和儿童使用相似的临界值(CV)。大多数实验室(27;39.1%)的临界值是结合已发表的文献和当地相关人员的意见得出的。最常见的通知方式是派人送达(42;60.9%),其次是电话通知(38;55.1%)。与公立医院实验室相比,私立实验室更有可能拥有单独的儿科 CV 列表(p = 0.019),并采用电话通知(p < 0.001):尼日利亚许多临床实验室的临界值通知做法各不相同,而且往往不尽如人意,而缺乏分析后程序的指导政策和国家建议又加剧了这种情况:本研究提供了尼日利亚实验室 CVN 实践的基线信息。本研究的贡献:本研究提供了尼日利亚实验室 CVN 实践的基线信息,探讨了实践差异的原因,为加强关键报告和分析后服务奠定了基础,尤其是在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的临床实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical values notification: A nationwide survey of practices among clinical laboratories across Nigeria.

Background: Critical value notification (CVN) entails notifying doctors or other laboratory users of aberrant laboratory results that threaten the patient's life and of any values for which reporting delays could negatively impact the patient's health. Critical value notification practices in clinical laboratories in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa are largely unknown.

Objective: We conducted a nationwide survey to obtain baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among purposively selected secondary- and tertiary-tier, public and private clinical laboratories across northern and southern Nigeria between October 2015 and December 2015. Consenting senior laboratory staff completed and returned a structured questionnaire, that gathered data on respondents' demographics, designations, and institutional characteristics and practices regarding CVN.

Results: One hundred and thirty-four laboratories responded to the questionnaires. Only 69 (51.5 %) laboratories practised CVN; only 23 (33.3%) had existing written policies guiding the practice. Most (43; 62.3%) laboratories use similar critical values (CVs) for adult and paediatric populations. Most laboratories (27; 39.1%) obtained their CVs by combining published literature and local opinions from stakeholders. Physical dispatch (42; 60.9%) followed by telephone calls (38; 55.1%) were the most common means of notification. Private laboratories, compared with public hospital laboratories, were likelier to have separate paediatric CV lists (p = 0.019) and practise telephone notifications (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Critical value notification practices vary and are often suboptimal in many clinical laboratories in Nigeria, which is exacerbated by the absence of guiding policies and national recommendations for post-analytical procedures.

What this study adds: This study provides baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories. The study explores the causes of practice variations that can serve as a foundation for enhancing critical reporting and post-analytical services, particularly in clinical laboratories in sub-Saharan Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信