{"title":"在线参照系培训对物理治疗专业学生客观结构化临床考试评估准确性的影响。","authors":"Tetsuro Watari, Kei Ohtsuka, Yukari Suzuki, Fumihiro Matsuda, Soichiro Koyama, Naoki Aizu, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Hiroaki Sakurai","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2022-032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how online frame-of-reference (FOR) training of raters of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for physical therapy students affects assessment accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted in a 1-month-long randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The participants were 36 physical therapists without experience assessing clinical skills using the OSCE. The training group completed the FOR training online, which was conducted once a week in two 90-minute sessions. The control group self-studied the rubric rating chart used in the assessment. As a measure of accuracy, weighted kappa coefficients were used to check the agreement between correct score and those assessment by the participant in the OSCE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores of the training group were higher than those of the control group in both post- and follow-up assessments, showing significant differences. No significant difference was found based on the assessment time and group for the high-agreement groups. Furthermore, scores of the low-accuracy training group were higher in the post- and follow-up assessments than those in the pre-assessment, showing significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online FOR training of the raters of the OSCE for physical therapists improved the assessment accuracy of the raters who had low accuracy in the pre-assessment; this improvement was maintained.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"9 4","pages":"288-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10701224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of online frame-of-reference training on assessment accuracy in the objective structured clinical examination for physical therapy students.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuro Watari, Kei Ohtsuka, Yukari Suzuki, Fumihiro Matsuda, Soichiro Koyama, Naoki Aizu, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Hiroaki Sakurai\",\"doi\":\"10.20407/fmj.2022-032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how online frame-of-reference (FOR) training of raters of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for physical therapy students affects assessment accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted in a 1-month-long randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The participants were 36 physical therapists without experience assessing clinical skills using the OSCE. The training group completed the FOR training online, which was conducted once a week in two 90-minute sessions. The control group self-studied the rubric rating chart used in the assessment. As a measure of accuracy, weighted kappa coefficients were used to check the agreement between correct score and those assessment by the participant in the OSCE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scores of the training group were higher than those of the control group in both post- and follow-up assessments, showing significant differences. No significant difference was found based on the assessment time and group for the high-agreement groups. Furthermore, scores of the low-accuracy training group were higher in the post- and follow-up assessments than those in the pre-assessment, showing significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online FOR training of the raters of the OSCE for physical therapists improved the assessment accuracy of the raters who had low accuracy in the pre-assessment; this improvement was maintained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"288-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10701224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2022-032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2022-032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究调查了物理治疗专业学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评分员的在线参照框架(FOR)培训如何影响评分准确性:本研究探讨了对物理治疗专业学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评分员进行在线参照框架(FOR)培训对评估准确性的影响:研究采用随机对照试验的方式进行,为期 1 个月:参与者:36 名没有使用 OSCE 评估临床技能经验的物理治疗师。培训组在网上完成 FOR 培训,每周一次,每次 90 分钟。对照组自学了评估中使用的评分表。作为准确性的衡量标准,我们使用加权卡帕系数来检验学员在 OSCE 中的正确得分与评估得分之间的一致性:结果:在后评估和跟踪评估中,培训组的得分均高于对照组,差异显著。高一致性组在评估时间和组别上没有发现明显差异。此外,低准确度培训组在后评估和后续评估中的得分均高于前评估,差异显著:结论:对物理治疗师 OSCE 的评分员进行在线 FOR 培训,提高了预评估中评分准确性较低的评分员的评估准确性,而且这种提高得以保持。
Effects of online frame-of-reference training on assessment accuracy in the objective structured clinical examination for physical therapy students.
Objectives: This study investigates how online frame-of-reference (FOR) training of raters of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for physical therapy students affects assessment accuracy.
Methods: The research was conducted in a 1-month-long randomized controlled trial.
Participants: The participants were 36 physical therapists without experience assessing clinical skills using the OSCE. The training group completed the FOR training online, which was conducted once a week in two 90-minute sessions. The control group self-studied the rubric rating chart used in the assessment. As a measure of accuracy, weighted kappa coefficients were used to check the agreement between correct score and those assessment by the participant in the OSCE.
Results: The scores of the training group were higher than those of the control group in both post- and follow-up assessments, showing significant differences. No significant difference was found based on the assessment time and group for the high-agreement groups. Furthermore, scores of the low-accuracy training group were higher in the post- and follow-up assessments than those in the pre-assessment, showing significant differences.
Conclusions: Online FOR training of the raters of the OSCE for physical therapists improved the assessment accuracy of the raters who had low accuracy in the pre-assessment; this improvement was maintained.