口服甲灭酸与扑热息痛作为预防性镇痛剂对接受疫苗接种儿童针刺疼痛的疗效:一项三臂、平行、三盲、安慰剂对照的 MAP VaC 随机对照试验。

Q2 Medicine
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2023-12-06 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25151355231216122
Rachna Pasi, Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu, Vinoth Kumar Kallidoss
{"title":"口服甲灭酸与扑热息痛作为预防性镇痛剂对接受疫苗接种儿童针刺疼痛的疗效:一项三臂、平行、三盲、安慰剂对照的 MAP VaC 随机对照试验。","authors":"Rachna Pasi, Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu, Vinoth Kumar Kallidoss","doi":"10.1177/25151355231216122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needle pain due to routine vaccination is an important factor contributing to low vaccine adherence and immunization coverage. Prophylactic oral analgesics can address this important issue of needle pain related to vaccination. Paracetamol and mefenamic acid are commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief, but there is little published literature on whether the same can be used for needle pain related to vaccination.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was planned to compare the efficacy of oral mefenamic acid and paracetamol over placebo as a prophylactic analgesic during vaccination and prophylactic antipyretic during the post-vaccination period.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>Three-arm, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at the outpatient department of a tertiary-level medical college in South India from January 2021 to June 2022. In this three-arm interventional trial, each arm had either a single dose of placebo or mefenamic acid (4 mg/kg/dose) or paracetamol (10 mg/kg/dose). These medicines were administered orally 30 min before vaccination to reduce needle pain.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Outcome was measured with the change of FLACC (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scoring at the time of vaccination, subsequently at 15 and 30 min of vaccination in all three groups. Appearance of fever, grade of fever, and need for antipyretics 24 h after vaccination were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in FLACC scores at the time of administration (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and at 15 min (<i>p</i> = 0.014) with mefenamic acid compared to placebo. Although the paracetamol group showed a difference when compared to the placebo, it was not significant at the time of administration (<i>p</i> = 0.401), at 15 min (<i>p</i> = 0.451), or 30 min (<i>p</i> = 0.892) post-vaccination. The appearance of fever, grade of fever, and use of antipyretic up to 24 h post-vaccination had no significant difference among any of the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mefenamic acid was more potent than placebo for pre-vaccination pain prophylaxis in children. There was no difference in the appearance of fever and its grade among the three groups. The promising results from this trial warrant further large-scale studies to recommend a single oral dose of mefenamic acid to tackle needle pain related to vaccination in children to improve vaccine adherence and coverage.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI (Clinical trials registry-India) (CTRI/2021/01/030239). [Date of Commencement: 13 Jan 2021, Date of last recruitment: 30 June 2022 (now closed for new participants)].</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10702398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of oral mefenamic acid <i>versus</i> paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for needle pain in children receiving vaccination: a three-arm, parallel, triple-blind, placebo-controlled MAP VaC randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rachna Pasi, Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu, Vinoth Kumar Kallidoss\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25151355231216122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needle pain due to routine vaccination is an important factor contributing to low vaccine adherence and immunization coverage. Prophylactic oral analgesics can address this important issue of needle pain related to vaccination. Paracetamol and mefenamic acid are commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief, but there is little published literature on whether the same can be used for needle pain related to vaccination.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was planned to compare the efficacy of oral mefenamic acid and paracetamol over placebo as a prophylactic analgesic during vaccination and prophylactic antipyretic during the post-vaccination period.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>Three-arm, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at the outpatient department of a tertiary-level medical college in South India from January 2021 to June 2022. In this three-arm interventional trial, each arm had either a single dose of placebo or mefenamic acid (4 mg/kg/dose) or paracetamol (10 mg/kg/dose). These medicines were administered orally 30 min before vaccination to reduce needle pain.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Outcome was measured with the change of FLACC (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scoring at the time of vaccination, subsequently at 15 and 30 min of vaccination in all three groups. Appearance of fever, grade of fever, and need for antipyretics 24 h after vaccination were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in FLACC scores at the time of administration (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and at 15 min (<i>p</i> = 0.014) with mefenamic acid compared to placebo. Although the paracetamol group showed a difference when compared to the placebo, it was not significant at the time of administration (<i>p</i> = 0.401), at 15 min (<i>p</i> = 0.451), or 30 min (<i>p</i> = 0.892) post-vaccination. The appearance of fever, grade of fever, and use of antipyretic up to 24 h post-vaccination had no significant difference among any of the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mefenamic acid was more potent than placebo for pre-vaccination pain prophylaxis in children. There was no difference in the appearance of fever and its grade among the three groups. The promising results from this trial warrant further large-scale studies to recommend a single oral dose of mefenamic acid to tackle needle pain related to vaccination in children to improve vaccine adherence and coverage.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI (Clinical trials registry-India) (CTRI/2021/01/030239). [Date of Commencement: 13 Jan 2021, Date of last recruitment: 30 June 2022 (now closed for new participants)].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10702398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231216122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231216122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:常规疫苗接种引起的针刺痛是导致疫苗接种率和免疫覆盖率低的一个重要因素。预防性口服镇痛药可以解决与疫苗接种有关的针刺痛这一重要问题。扑热息痛和甲灭酸是常用的非甾体类消炎止痛药,但关于这两种药是否可用于接种疫苗引起的针刺痛,已发表的文献很少:本研究计划比较口服甲灭酸和扑热息痛作为疫苗接种期间预防性镇痛药和疫苗接种后预防性退烧药对安慰剂的疗效:设计:三臂、三盲、随机对照试验:本研究于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月在南印度一所三级医学院的门诊部进行。在这项三组干预试验中,每组都有单剂量的安慰剂或甲灭那酸(4 毫克/千克/剂量)或扑热息痛(10 毫克/千克/剂量)。这些药物在疫苗接种前 30 分钟口服,以减轻针刺疼痛:主要结果:接种疫苗时、接种疫苗后 15 分钟和 30 分钟,所有三组患者的 FLACC(脸部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰)评分均有变化。此外,还记录了接种 24 小时后的发热情况、发热等级和退烧药需求:结果:与安慰剂相比,甲灭酸在接种时(p = 0.010)和接种后 15 分钟(p = 0.014)的 FLACC 评分有明显差异。虽然扑热息痛组与安慰剂组相比有差异,但在接种时(p = 0.401)、接种后 15 分钟(p = 0.451)或 30 分钟(p = 0.892)差异不显著。三组接种后 24 小时内的发烧症状、发烧程度和退烧药使用情况均无显著差异:结论:对于儿童接种疫苗前的疼痛预防,甲灭酸比安慰剂更有效。结论:甲氰咪胍对儿童接种前疼痛的预防效果优于安慰剂,三组儿童的发热症状和等级没有差异。这项试验的结果令人鼓舞,值得进一步开展大规模研究,推荐使用单次口服剂量的甲灭酸来解决儿童接种疫苗时的针刺疼痛问题,以提高疫苗接种的依从性和覆盖率:试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)(CTRI/2021/01/030239)。[试验注册:CTRI(印度临床试验注册中心)(CTRI/2021/01/030239):开始日期:2021 年 1 月 13 日,最后招募日期:2022 年 6 月 30 日:开始日期:2021 年 1 月 13 日,最后招募日期:2022 年 6 月 30 日(现已停止招募新参与者)]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of oral mefenamic acid versus paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for needle pain in children receiving vaccination: a three-arm, parallel, triple-blind, placebo-controlled MAP VaC randomized controlled trial.

Background: Needle pain due to routine vaccination is an important factor contributing to low vaccine adherence and immunization coverage. Prophylactic oral analgesics can address this important issue of needle pain related to vaccination. Paracetamol and mefenamic acid are commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief, but there is little published literature on whether the same can be used for needle pain related to vaccination.

Objectives: This study was planned to compare the efficacy of oral mefenamic acid and paracetamol over placebo as a prophylactic analgesic during vaccination and prophylactic antipyretic during the post-vaccination period.

Designs: Three-arm, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Methods: This study was conducted at the outpatient department of a tertiary-level medical college in South India from January 2021 to June 2022. In this three-arm interventional trial, each arm had either a single dose of placebo or mefenamic acid (4 mg/kg/dose) or paracetamol (10 mg/kg/dose). These medicines were administered orally 30 min before vaccination to reduce needle pain.

Main outcome and measures: Outcome was measured with the change of FLACC (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scoring at the time of vaccination, subsequently at 15 and 30 min of vaccination in all three groups. Appearance of fever, grade of fever, and need for antipyretics 24 h after vaccination were also noted.

Results: There was a significant difference in FLACC scores at the time of administration (p = 0.010) and at 15 min (p = 0.014) with mefenamic acid compared to placebo. Although the paracetamol group showed a difference when compared to the placebo, it was not significant at the time of administration (p = 0.401), at 15 min (p = 0.451), or 30 min (p = 0.892) post-vaccination. The appearance of fever, grade of fever, and use of antipyretic up to 24 h post-vaccination had no significant difference among any of the three groups.

Conclusion: Mefenamic acid was more potent than placebo for pre-vaccination pain prophylaxis in children. There was no difference in the appearance of fever and its grade among the three groups. The promising results from this trial warrant further large-scale studies to recommend a single oral dose of mefenamic acid to tackle needle pain related to vaccination in children to improve vaccine adherence and coverage.

Trial registration: CTRI (Clinical trials registry-India) (CTRI/2021/01/030239). [Date of Commencement: 13 Jan 2021, Date of last recruitment: 30 June 2022 (now closed for new participants)].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信