{"title":"针对颈内动脉受累的复发性鼻咽癌患者不耐受栓塞治疗的策略。","authors":"W-B Wu, X-B Zhang, Z-K Feng, H-F Li, Y-P Liu, J-L Liang, Y-L Xie, Y-J Hua, R Sun, S-L Wang, J-H Chen, M-Y Chen","doi":"10.4193/RhinRhin23.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) involving the internal carotid artery (ICA) is challenging, as the massive bleeding caused by intraoperative rupture of the ICA is life-threatening. We reported that ICA embolization is an effective pretreatment to avoid fatal bleeding, but some patients cannot tolerate the procedure. We used endovascular vascular protection (ICA stents), vascular sacrifice (bypass grafting) and extravascular vascular protection (transcervical external stent placement) of the ICA to provide alternative options for these patients. METHODOLOGYy: This study enrolled patients with rNPC adjacent to or invading the ICA who were unsuitable for ICA embolization from January 2015 to June 2020. ICA pretreatment combined with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was performed for the 30 patients. We report the survival outcome and incidence of complications after ICA pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICA pretreatment was performed for the 30 enrolled patients, among whom 8 underwent endoscopic-assisted transcervical protection of the parapharyngeal ICA combined with ENPG, 6 underwent bypass grafting, and 16 underwent ICA stent implantation followed by ENPG. After pretreatment, at a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 2-80 months), the 3-year locoregional overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 62.9%, 61.3%, 70.2%, and 71.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICA pretreatment combined with salvage ENPG enables the feasible and effective resection of rNPC lesions involving the ICA in patients who cannot tolerate ICA embolization. Therefore, this treatment may be an effective method for improving outcomes. Multidisciplinary therapy is needed to reduce operation-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"342-352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma involved internal carotid artery who are intolerant to embolization.\",\"authors\":\"W-B Wu, X-B Zhang, Z-K Feng, H-F Li, Y-P Liu, J-L Liang, Y-L Xie, Y-J Hua, R Sun, S-L Wang, J-H Chen, M-Y Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/RhinRhin23.130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) involving the internal carotid artery (ICA) is challenging, as the massive bleeding caused by intraoperative rupture of the ICA is life-threatening. We reported that ICA embolization is an effective pretreatment to avoid fatal bleeding, but some patients cannot tolerate the procedure. We used endovascular vascular protection (ICA stents), vascular sacrifice (bypass grafting) and extravascular vascular protection (transcervical external stent placement) of the ICA to provide alternative options for these patients. METHODOLOGYy: This study enrolled patients with rNPC adjacent to or invading the ICA who were unsuitable for ICA embolization from January 2015 to June 2020. ICA pretreatment combined with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was performed for the 30 patients. We report the survival outcome and incidence of complications after ICA pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICA pretreatment was performed for the 30 enrolled patients, among whom 8 underwent endoscopic-assisted transcervical protection of the parapharyngeal ICA combined with ENPG, 6 underwent bypass grafting, and 16 underwent ICA stent implantation followed by ENPG. After pretreatment, at a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 2-80 months), the 3-year locoregional overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 62.9%, 61.3%, 70.2%, and 71.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICA pretreatment combined with salvage ENPG enables the feasible and effective resection of rNPC lesions involving the ICA in patients who cannot tolerate ICA embolization. Therefore, this treatment may be an effective method for improving outcomes. Multidisciplinary therapy is needed to reduce operation-related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"342-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/RhinRhin23.130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/RhinRhin23.130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategies for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma involved internal carotid artery who are intolerant to embolization.
Background: The surgical treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) involving the internal carotid artery (ICA) is challenging, as the massive bleeding caused by intraoperative rupture of the ICA is life-threatening. We reported that ICA embolization is an effective pretreatment to avoid fatal bleeding, but some patients cannot tolerate the procedure. We used endovascular vascular protection (ICA stents), vascular sacrifice (bypass grafting) and extravascular vascular protection (transcervical external stent placement) of the ICA to provide alternative options for these patients. METHODOLOGYy: This study enrolled patients with rNPC adjacent to or invading the ICA who were unsuitable for ICA embolization from January 2015 to June 2020. ICA pretreatment combined with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was performed for the 30 patients. We report the survival outcome and incidence of complications after ICA pretreatment.
Results: ICA pretreatment was performed for the 30 enrolled patients, among whom 8 underwent endoscopic-assisted transcervical protection of the parapharyngeal ICA combined with ENPG, 6 underwent bypass grafting, and 16 underwent ICA stent implantation followed by ENPG. After pretreatment, at a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 2-80 months), the 3-year locoregional overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 62.9%, 61.3%, 70.2%, and 71.4%, respectively.
Conclusions: ICA pretreatment combined with salvage ENPG enables the feasible and effective resection of rNPC lesions involving the ICA in patients who cannot tolerate ICA embolization. Therefore, this treatment may be an effective method for improving outcomes. Multidisciplinary therapy is needed to reduce operation-related complications.
期刊介绍:
Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020.
Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.