Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman
{"title":"评估金融毒性的简易筛选工具。","authors":"Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman","doi":"10.1188/24.ONF.17-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"51 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman\",\"doi\":\"10.1188/24.ONF.17-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"17-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1188/24.ONF.17-23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/24.ONF.17-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity.
Objectives: To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.
Sample & setting: 50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.
Methods & variables: Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.
Results: The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).
Implications for nursing: This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to
Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership.
Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care.
Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.