银屑病关节炎患者抗肿瘤坏死因子和抗白细胞介素-17抗体的长期保留率。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kenji Takami, Shigeyoshi Tsuji, Sachina Sato, Kazuya Akaji, Chigusa Yamashita, Shiori Hiroumi, Hachiro Konaka, Misa Hayashi, Mari Higashiyama
{"title":"银屑病关节炎患者抗肿瘤坏死因子和抗白细胞介素-17抗体的长期保留率。","authors":"Kenji Takami, Shigeyoshi Tsuji, Sachina Sato, Kazuya Akaji, Chigusa Yamashita, Shiori Hiroumi, Hachiro Konaka, Misa Hayashi, Mari Higashiyama","doi":"10.1093/mr/road111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While biologics have been used for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, there remains to be unknown concerning long-term retention rates. This study aims to present real-world data about long-term retention rates of biologics for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, and to undertake an analysis of the contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation for biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in 146 prescriptions (of which, 109 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since March 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the entire course of the study, the 10-year retention rates were approximately 70% for adalimumab, 50% for ixekizumab, and 40% for secukinumab. When evaluating retention rates in the biologic-naïve subgroups, the 10-year retention rates were all approximately 70%. Regarding certolizumab pegol, the 3-year retention rate was approximately 75%. For adalimumab, a higher degree of arthritis at the initiation of treatment was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of secondary inefficacy. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy, except for ixekizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each biologic exhibited a favourable long-term retention rate. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy. Regarding adalimumab, secondary inefficacy was linked to the extent of arthritis upon treatment initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term retention rates of anti-tumour necrosis factor and anti-interleukin-17 antibodies for patients with psoriatic arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Takami, Shigeyoshi Tsuji, Sachina Sato, Kazuya Akaji, Chigusa Yamashita, Shiori Hiroumi, Hachiro Konaka, Misa Hayashi, Mari Higashiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/road111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While biologics have been used for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, there remains to be unknown concerning long-term retention rates. This study aims to present real-world data about long-term retention rates of biologics for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, and to undertake an analysis of the contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation for biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in 146 prescriptions (of which, 109 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since March 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the entire course of the study, the 10-year retention rates were approximately 70% for adalimumab, 50% for ixekizumab, and 40% for secukinumab. When evaluating retention rates in the biologic-naïve subgroups, the 10-year retention rates were all approximately 70%. Regarding certolizumab pegol, the 3-year retention rate was approximately 75%. For adalimumab, a higher degree of arthritis at the initiation of treatment was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of secondary inefficacy. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy, except for ixekizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each biologic exhibited a favourable long-term retention rate. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy. Regarding adalimumab, secondary inefficacy was linked to the extent of arthritis upon treatment initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/road111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/road111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然银屑病关节炎患者一直在使用生物制剂,但长期保留率仍是一个未知数。本研究旨在提供有关银屑病关节炎患者长期使用生物制剂的真实数据,并对其诱因进行分析:我们对本院自2010年3月以来的146张处方(其中109张处方为幼稚处方)中生物制剂(阿达木单抗、certolizumab pegol、secukinumab和ixekizumab)的保留率和停药原因进行了研究:在整个研究过程中,阿达木单抗的10年保留率约为70%,ixekizumab为50%,secukinumab为40%。在评估生物制剂新药亚组的保留率时,10年保留率均约为70%。关于certolizumab pegol,3年保留率约为75%。就阿达木单抗而言,开始治疗时关节炎程度越高,继发性无效的可能性就越大。停药的主要原因是继发性无效,但ixekizumab除外:结论:每种生物制剂的长期保留率都很高。结论:每种生物制剂的长期保留率都很高,停药的主要原因是继发性无效。阿达木单抗的继发性无效与开始治疗时的关节炎程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term retention rates of anti-tumour necrosis factor and anti-interleukin-17 antibodies for patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Objective: While biologics have been used for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, there remains to be unknown concerning long-term retention rates. This study aims to present real-world data about long-term retention rates of biologics for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, and to undertake an analysis of the contributing factors.

Methods: We examined retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation for biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in 146 prescriptions (of which, 109 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since March 2010.

Results: Throughout the entire course of the study, the 10-year retention rates were approximately 70% for adalimumab, 50% for ixekizumab, and 40% for secukinumab. When evaluating retention rates in the biologic-naïve subgroups, the 10-year retention rates were all approximately 70%. Regarding certolizumab pegol, the 3-year retention rate was approximately 75%. For adalimumab, a higher degree of arthritis at the initiation of treatment was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of secondary inefficacy. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy, except for ixekizumab.

Conclusions: Each biologic exhibited a favourable long-term retention rate. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy. Regarding adalimumab, secondary inefficacy was linked to the extent of arthritis upon treatment initiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信