评估 "新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估 "以预测极早产儿晚期败血症的死亡率。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2165-8307
Elvis Kraja, Ferhan Demirtas, Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, Nazmiye Turker, Emel Okulu, Ömer Erdeve, Begum Atasay, Saadet Arsan
{"title":"评估 \"新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估 \"以预测极早产儿晚期败血症的死亡率。","authors":"Elvis Kraja, Ferhan Demirtas, Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, Nazmiye Turker, Emel Okulu, Ömer Erdeve, Begum Atasay, Saadet Arsan","doi":"10.1055/a-2165-8307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the use of \"Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment\" (nSOFA) scoring in predicting mortality, to compare the accuracy of nSOFA scores at different time points in very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS), and to investigate other possible parameters that would improve the prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included preterm infants born atS<32 weeks' gestation with culture-proven LOS. The nSOFA scores of non-fatal and fatal episodes were compared at nine time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 120 culture-proven LOS episodes in 106 infants, 90 (75%) episodes were non-fatal and 30 (25%) episodes were fatal. The mean birth weight (BW) of the infants who died was lower than that of survivors (p=0.038). In the fatal LOS episodes, median nSOFA scores were higher at all time points measured before sepsis evaluation, at the time of evaluation, and at all time points measured after the evaluation (p<0.001). nSOFA scores before death and at 48 hours were higher in the fatal episodes (p<0.001). At the time of sepsis assessment, nSOFA score>4 was associated with a 7- to 16-fold increased risk of mortality. Adjustment for BW, lymphocyte and monocyte counts increased the risk to 9- to 18-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the use of nSOFA to predict mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants seems feasible. The scoring system could be improved by evaluating the other parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the \\\"Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment\\\" to Predict Mortality in Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Kraja, Ferhan Demirtas, Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, Nazmiye Turker, Emel Okulu, Ömer Erdeve, Begum Atasay, Saadet Arsan\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2165-8307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the use of \\\"Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment\\\" (nSOFA) scoring in predicting mortality, to compare the accuracy of nSOFA scores at different time points in very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS), and to investigate other possible parameters that would improve the prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included preterm infants born atS<32 weeks' gestation with culture-proven LOS. The nSOFA scores of non-fatal and fatal episodes were compared at nine time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 120 culture-proven LOS episodes in 106 infants, 90 (75%) episodes were non-fatal and 30 (25%) episodes were fatal. The mean birth weight (BW) of the infants who died was lower than that of survivors (p=0.038). In the fatal LOS episodes, median nSOFA scores were higher at all time points measured before sepsis evaluation, at the time of evaluation, and at all time points measured after the evaluation (p<0.001). nSOFA scores before death and at 48 hours were higher in the fatal episodes (p<0.001). At the time of sepsis assessment, nSOFA score>4 was associated with a 7- to 16-fold increased risk of mortality. Adjustment for BW, lymphocyte and monocyte counts increased the risk to 9- to 18-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the use of nSOFA to predict mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants seems feasible. The scoring system could be improved by evaluating the other parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-8307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-8307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介我们的目的是评估 "新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估"(nSOFA)评分在预测死亡率中的应用,比较晚发败血症(LOS)的极早产儿在不同时间点的 nSOFA 评分的准确性,并研究可改善预测的其他可能参数:这项单一中心的回顾性研究纳入了出生时即患有败血症的早产儿:在106名婴儿的120次培养证实的LOS中,90次(75%)为非致命性,30次(25%)为致命性。死亡婴儿的平均出生体重(BW)低于存活婴儿(P=0.038)。在致命的 LOS 病例中,脓毒症评估前、评估时和评估后所有时间点的 nSOFA 中位数评分均较高(p4 与死亡风险增加 7 到 16 倍有关)。对体重、淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数进行调整后,风险增加到 9 至 18 倍:这项研究表明,使用 nSOFA 预测极早产儿的死亡率和发病率似乎是可行的。该评分系统可通过评估其他参数加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the "Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment" to Predict Mortality in Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants.

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the use of "Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment" (nSOFA) scoring in predicting mortality, to compare the accuracy of nSOFA scores at different time points in very preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS), and to investigate other possible parameters that would improve the prediction.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included preterm infants born atS<32 weeks' gestation with culture-proven LOS. The nSOFA scores of non-fatal and fatal episodes were compared at nine time points.

Results: Of 120 culture-proven LOS episodes in 106 infants, 90 (75%) episodes were non-fatal and 30 (25%) episodes were fatal. The mean birth weight (BW) of the infants who died was lower than that of survivors (p=0.038). In the fatal LOS episodes, median nSOFA scores were higher at all time points measured before sepsis evaluation, at the time of evaluation, and at all time points measured after the evaluation (p<0.001). nSOFA scores before death and at 48 hours were higher in the fatal episodes (p<0.001). At the time of sepsis assessment, nSOFA score>4 was associated with a 7- to 16-fold increased risk of mortality. Adjustment for BW, lymphocyte and monocyte counts increased the risk to 9- to 18-fold.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the use of nSOFA to predict mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants seems feasible. The scoring system could be improved by evaluating the other parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信