头颈部肿瘤手术后需要术后机械通气的患者静脉输注右美托咪定与异丙酚在阿片类药物消耗量方面的镇静效果比较--一项随机前瞻性研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_949_20
Anuradha Patel, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharti, Vinod Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar, Abhishek Kumar
{"title":"头颈部肿瘤手术后需要术后机械通气的患者静脉输注右美托咪定与异丙酚在阿片类药物消耗量方面的镇静效果比较--一项随机前瞻性研究。","authors":"Anuradha Patel, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharti, Vinod Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar, Abhishek Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ijc.IJC_949_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The conventional drug regimen of sedation for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is propofol or midazolam. Dexmedetomidine is a newer drug for sedation with a better clinical profile. We conducted this study to compare the sedative efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients after head and neck cancer surgeries requiring mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 80 patients undergoing head and neck onco-surgery were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated to group I [1 mg/kg of bolus propofol over 15 minutes followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour titrated by increasing or decreasing the infusion dose to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) 2-4] or group II (a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.4 µg/kg/hour titrated to desired sedation level). The RSS, behavioral pain scale (BPS), heart rate, blood pressure, fentanyl consumption, additional sedative agent, extubation time, length of ICU stays, mechanical ventilation duration, side effects, and patient's satisfaction were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total fentanyl required was 0.56 ± 0.13 µg/kg/hour in group II and 0.58 ± 0.18 µg/kg/hour in group I ( P = 0.75). Extubation time, RSS, BPS, patient satisfaction, and ICU duration were similar in both the groups. The incidence of hemodynamic-related adverse effects were 41.67% in group II and 11.11% in group I ( P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fentanyl requirement was comparable in both the groups in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of bradycardia and hypotension as compared to the propofol group. Propofol should be the preferred sedative for postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco-surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":" ","pages":"81-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of sedation efficacy of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in terms of opioid consumption in patients requiring postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco-surgeries - A randomized prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Anuradha Patel, Rakesh Garg, Sachidanand Jee Bharti, Vinod Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar, Abhishek Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijc.IJC_949_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The conventional drug regimen of sedation for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is propofol or midazolam. Dexmedetomidine is a newer drug for sedation with a better clinical profile. We conducted this study to compare the sedative efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients after head and neck cancer surgeries requiring mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 80 patients undergoing head and neck onco-surgery were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated to group I [1 mg/kg of bolus propofol over 15 minutes followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour titrated by increasing or decreasing the infusion dose to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) 2-4] or group II (a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.4 µg/kg/hour titrated to desired sedation level). The RSS, behavioral pain scale (BPS), heart rate, blood pressure, fentanyl consumption, additional sedative agent, extubation time, length of ICU stays, mechanical ventilation duration, side effects, and patient's satisfaction were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total fentanyl required was 0.56 ± 0.13 µg/kg/hour in group II and 0.58 ± 0.18 µg/kg/hour in group I ( P = 0.75). Extubation time, RSS, BPS, patient satisfaction, and ICU duration were similar in both the groups. The incidence of hemodynamic-related adverse effects were 41.67% in group II and 11.11% in group I ( P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fentanyl requirement was comparable in both the groups in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of bradycardia and hypotension as compared to the propofol group. Propofol should be the preferred sedative for postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco-surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_949_20\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_949_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)中需要机械通气的患者的常规镇静药物方案是异丙酚或咪达唑仑。右美托咪定是一种较新的镇静药物,临床效果更好。我们开展了这项研究,以比较右美托咪定与丙泊酚在需要机械通气的头颈部癌症手术后患者中的镇静效果:方法:经伦理委员会批准和书面知情同意后,我们招募了 80 名接受头颈部肿瘤手术的患者。这些患者被随机分配到 I 组(在 15 分钟内注射 1 毫克/千克异丙酚,然后输注 1 毫克/千克/小时,根据拉姆塞镇静评分(RSS)2-4 来增减输注剂量)或 II 组(在 15 分钟内注射 1 微克/千克右美托咪定的负荷剂量,然后输注 0.4 微克/千克/小时的维持剂量,根据所需的镇静水平进行滴定)。记录了RSS、行为疼痛量表(BPS)、心率、血压、芬太尼用量、额外镇静剂、拔管时间、重症监护室停留时间、机械通气持续时间、副作用和患者满意度:第二组所需的芬太尼总量为 0.56 ± 0.13 μg/kg/小时,第一组为 0.58 ± 0.18 μg/kg/小时(P = 0.75)。两组的拔管时间、RSS、BPS、患者满意度和重症监护室持续时间相似。与血流动力学相关的不良反应发生率,II 组为 41.67%,I 组为 11.11%(P = 0.006):结论:术后两组的芬太尼需求量相当。与异丙酚组相比,右美托咪定会增加心动过缓和低血压的发生率。在头颈部肿瘤手术后进行机械通气时,异丙酚应作为首选镇静剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of sedation efficacy of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in terms of opioid consumption in patients requiring postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco-surgeries - A randomized prospective study.

Background: The conventional drug regimen of sedation for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is propofol or midazolam. Dexmedetomidine is a newer drug for sedation with a better clinical profile. We conducted this study to compare the sedative efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients after head and neck cancer surgeries requiring mechanical ventilation.

Methods: After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 80 patients undergoing head and neck onco-surgery were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated to group I [1 mg/kg of bolus propofol over 15 minutes followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour titrated by increasing or decreasing the infusion dose to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) 2-4] or group II (a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.4 µg/kg/hour titrated to desired sedation level). The RSS, behavioral pain scale (BPS), heart rate, blood pressure, fentanyl consumption, additional sedative agent, extubation time, length of ICU stays, mechanical ventilation duration, side effects, and patient's satisfaction were noted.

Results: Total fentanyl required was 0.56 ± 0.13 µg/kg/hour in group II and 0.58 ± 0.18 µg/kg/hour in group I ( P = 0.75). Extubation time, RSS, BPS, patient satisfaction, and ICU duration were similar in both the groups. The incidence of hemodynamic-related adverse effects were 41.67% in group II and 11.11% in group I ( P = 0.006).

Conclusion: The fentanyl requirement was comparable in both the groups in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of bradycardia and hypotension as compared to the propofol group. Propofol should be the preferred sedative for postoperative mechanical ventilation after head and neck onco-surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信