Hashem H Ghoraba, Michael Yu, Gina Yu, Sean Wang, Chris Or, Irmak Karaca, Quan Dong Nguyen
{"title":"颈动脉双相超声正常时的眼部缺血综合征。","authors":"Hashem H Ghoraba, Michael Yu, Gina Yu, Sean Wang, Chris Or, Irmak Karaca, Quan Dong Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/ICB.0000000000001528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe two cases of ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) that were initially ruled out because of a negative carotid duplex ultrasound but eventually confirmed by angiography studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case 1: A 67-year-old woman presented with symptoms suggestive of OIS, but carotid duplex ultrasound was negative, and the patient was diagnosed with occlusive retinal vasculitis due to retinal nonperfusion and vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography. Immunosuppressive therapy was initiated, but her symptoms did not improve. Computerized tomography angiography was significant for severe osteal stenosis of the aortic arch vessels. Left common carotid angioplasty and stenting resulted in complete resolution of the symptoms and vascular leakage of the left eye. Case 2: A 41-year-old man with cryoglobulinemia-associated vasculitis complained of symptoms consistent with OIS, which was initially ruled out through a negative carotid duplex ultrasound. Fluorescein angiography revealed delayed arterial filling with poor retinal perfusion. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed ophthalmic artery stenosis, which was attributed to the underlying systemic vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Computerized tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography should be performed to rule out OIS if duplex ultrasound is negative in the setting of high clinical suspicion. Carotid ostial and ophthalmic artery stenoses are rare but possible causes of OIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":53580,"journal":{"name":"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports","volume":" ","pages":"221-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OCULAR ISCHEMIC SYNDROME IN THE SETTING OF NORMAL CAROTID DUPLEX ULTRASOUND.\",\"authors\":\"Hashem H Ghoraba, Michael Yu, Gina Yu, Sean Wang, Chris Or, Irmak Karaca, Quan Dong Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICB.0000000000001528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe two cases of ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) that were initially ruled out because of a negative carotid duplex ultrasound but eventually confirmed by angiography studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case 1: A 67-year-old woman presented with symptoms suggestive of OIS, but carotid duplex ultrasound was negative, and the patient was diagnosed with occlusive retinal vasculitis due to retinal nonperfusion and vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography. Immunosuppressive therapy was initiated, but her symptoms did not improve. Computerized tomography angiography was significant for severe osteal stenosis of the aortic arch vessels. Left common carotid angioplasty and stenting resulted in complete resolution of the symptoms and vascular leakage of the left eye. Case 2: A 41-year-old man with cryoglobulinemia-associated vasculitis complained of symptoms consistent with OIS, which was initially ruled out through a negative carotid duplex ultrasound. Fluorescein angiography revealed delayed arterial filling with poor retinal perfusion. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed ophthalmic artery stenosis, which was attributed to the underlying systemic vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Computerized tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography should be performed to rule out OIS if duplex ultrasound is negative in the setting of high clinical suspicion. Carotid ostial and ophthalmic artery stenoses are rare but possible causes of OIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000001528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retinal Cases and Brief Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000001528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述两例眼部缺血综合征(OIS)病例,这两例病例最初因颈动脉双相超声检查(DUS)阴性而被排除,但最终经血管造影检查证实:病例系列:病例1:一名67岁的女性患者出现了提示OIS的症状,但颈动脉DUS呈阴性,由于荧光素血管造影(FA)显示视网膜无灌注和血管渗漏,患者被诊断为闭塞性视网膜血管炎。患者开始接受免疫抑制治疗,但症状未见好转。计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)显示主动脉弓血管严重骨膜狭窄。左侧颈总动脉血管成形术和支架植入术后,症状和左眼血管渗漏完全消失。病例 2:一名患有冷球蛋白血症相关性血管炎的 41 岁男性患者,主诉症状与 OIS 一致,最初通过颈动脉 DUS 阴性排除了 OIS。FA显示动脉充盈延迟,视网膜灌注不良。磁共振血管造影(MRA)显示眼动脉狭窄,这归因于潜在的全身性血管炎:结论:在临床高度怀疑的情况下,如果 DUS 呈阴性,则应进行 CTA 或 MRA 以排除 OIS。颈动脉骨膜和眼动脉狭窄虽然罕见,但也可能是导致OIS的原因。
OCULAR ISCHEMIC SYNDROME IN THE SETTING OF NORMAL CAROTID DUPLEX ULTRASOUND.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe two cases of ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) that were initially ruled out because of a negative carotid duplex ultrasound but eventually confirmed by angiography studies.
Methods: This is a case series.
Results: Case 1: A 67-year-old woman presented with symptoms suggestive of OIS, but carotid duplex ultrasound was negative, and the patient was diagnosed with occlusive retinal vasculitis due to retinal nonperfusion and vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography. Immunosuppressive therapy was initiated, but her symptoms did not improve. Computerized tomography angiography was significant for severe osteal stenosis of the aortic arch vessels. Left common carotid angioplasty and stenting resulted in complete resolution of the symptoms and vascular leakage of the left eye. Case 2: A 41-year-old man with cryoglobulinemia-associated vasculitis complained of symptoms consistent with OIS, which was initially ruled out through a negative carotid duplex ultrasound. Fluorescein angiography revealed delayed arterial filling with poor retinal perfusion. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed ophthalmic artery stenosis, which was attributed to the underlying systemic vasculitis.
Conclusion: Computerized tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography should be performed to rule out OIS if duplex ultrasound is negative in the setting of high clinical suspicion. Carotid ostial and ophthalmic artery stenoses are rare but possible causes of OIS.