特发性颅内高压症患者人称优先语言的流行率:病例报告的系统回顾。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1097/WNO.0000000000002047
Amir R Vosoughi, Bhadra U Pandya, Natalie Mezey, Brendan K Tao, Jonathan A Micieli
{"title":"特发性颅内高压症患者人称优先语言的流行率:病例报告的系统回顾。","authors":"Amir R Vosoughi, Bhadra U Pandya, Natalie Mezey, Brendan K Tao, Jonathan A Micieli","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-first language (PFL) is a linguistic prescription, which places a person before their disease. It is considered an important tool to reduce stigma. However, PFL is not routinely used across the scientific literature, particularly in patients with overweight or obesity. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) face various stigmas through high rates of poverty, female gender, and frequent rates of comorbidities. Non-PFL language use intersects and worsen the health inequities faced by these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of case reports. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all case reports with \"pseudotumor cerebri\" [MESH] OR \"Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension\" as key word between January 1974 and August 2022. The primary criterion was the article's inclusion of patients with overweight or obesity. The secondary criterion was the article's discussion regarding obesity as risk factor. Articles not meeting primary or secondary criteria were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 514/716 (71.8%) articles used non-PFL language. The publication year was predictive of non-PFL language: 1976-1991 (82.3%) vs 1992-2007 (72.3%, P = 0.0394) and 2008-2022 (68.3%, P = 0.0056). Non-PFL was significantly higher in obesity compared with other medical conditions (60.3% vs 7.3%, P < 0.001). The patient gender ( P = 0.111) and ethnicity ( P = 0.697), author's specialty ( P = 0.298), and primary English-speaking status ( P = 0.231), as well as the journal's impact factor ( P = 0.795), were not predictive of non-PFL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most literature focused on IIH use non-PFL when discussing overweight or obesity, regardless of the patient's gender and ethnicity, journal's impact factor, senior author's specialty, and English-speaking status. Non-PFL use is much more common when discussing obesity compared with other medical conditions. Appropriate use of PFL can decrease stigma and, more importantly, decrease the intersectionality of health stigma faced by patients with IIH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"565-570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Person-First Language in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.\",\"authors\":\"Amir R Vosoughi, Bhadra U Pandya, Natalie Mezey, Brendan K Tao, Jonathan A Micieli\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-first language (PFL) is a linguistic prescription, which places a person before their disease. It is considered an important tool to reduce stigma. However, PFL is not routinely used across the scientific literature, particularly in patients with overweight or obesity. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) face various stigmas through high rates of poverty, female gender, and frequent rates of comorbidities. Non-PFL language use intersects and worsen the health inequities faced by these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of case reports. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all case reports with \\\"pseudotumor cerebri\\\" [MESH] OR \\\"Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension\\\" as key word between January 1974 and August 2022. The primary criterion was the article's inclusion of patients with overweight or obesity. The secondary criterion was the article's discussion regarding obesity as risk factor. Articles not meeting primary or secondary criteria were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 514/716 (71.8%) articles used non-PFL language. The publication year was predictive of non-PFL language: 1976-1991 (82.3%) vs 1992-2007 (72.3%, P = 0.0394) and 2008-2022 (68.3%, P = 0.0056). Non-PFL was significantly higher in obesity compared with other medical conditions (60.3% vs 7.3%, P < 0.001). The patient gender ( P = 0.111) and ethnicity ( P = 0.697), author's specialty ( P = 0.298), and primary English-speaking status ( P = 0.231), as well as the journal's impact factor ( P = 0.795), were not predictive of non-PFL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most literature focused on IIH use non-PFL when discussing overweight or obesity, regardless of the patient's gender and ethnicity, journal's impact factor, senior author's specialty, and English-speaking status. Non-PFL use is much more common when discussing obesity compared with other medical conditions. Appropriate use of PFL can decrease stigma and, more importantly, decrease the intersectionality of health stigma faced by patients with IIH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"565-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以人为本的语言(PFL)是一种语言处方,将人置于疾病之前。它被认为是减少耻辱感的重要工具。然而,PFL 并未在科学文献中常规使用,尤其是在超重或肥胖患者中。特发性颅内高压(IIH)患者因贫困率高、女性性别和频繁的并发症而面临各种耻辱。非 PFL 语言的使用与这些患者所面临的健康不平等问题相互交织,并使之恶化:方法:对病例报告进行系统回顾。在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中检索了 1974 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月间所有以 "假性脑瘤"[MESH] 或 "特发性颅内高压 "为关键词的病例报告。首要标准是文章是否包含超重或肥胖患者。次要标准是文章对肥胖作为风险因素的讨论。不符合主要或次要标准的文章被排除在外:约有 514/716 篇文章(71.8%)使用了非 PFL 语言。发表年份可预测是否使用了非 PFL 语言:1976-1991年(82.3%)vs 1992-2007年(72.3%,P = 0.0394)和2008-2022年(68.3%,P = 0.0056)。与其他病症相比,肥胖症患者中的非肥胖症患者比例明显更高(60.3% vs 7.3%,P < 0.001)。患者的性别(P = 0.111)、种族(P = 0.697)、作者的专业(P = 0.298)、主要英语国家(P = 0.231)以及期刊的影响因子(P = 0.795)都不能预测非PFL:结论:大多数关注 IIH 的文献在讨论超重或肥胖问题时都使用了非 PFL,与患者的性别和种族、期刊的影响因子、资深作者的专业以及英语水平无关。与其他病症相比,在讨论肥胖症时不使用 PFL 的情况更为普遍。适当使用 PFL 可以减少耻辱感,更重要的是,可以减少 IIH 患者所面临的健康耻辱感的交叉性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Person-First Language in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Background: Person-first language (PFL) is a linguistic prescription, which places a person before their disease. It is considered an important tool to reduce stigma. However, PFL is not routinely used across the scientific literature, particularly in patients with overweight or obesity. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) face various stigmas through high rates of poverty, female gender, and frequent rates of comorbidities. Non-PFL language use intersects and worsen the health inequities faced by these patients.

Methods: A systematic review of case reports. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all case reports with "pseudotumor cerebri" [MESH] OR "Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension" as key word between January 1974 and August 2022. The primary criterion was the article's inclusion of patients with overweight or obesity. The secondary criterion was the article's discussion regarding obesity as risk factor. Articles not meeting primary or secondary criteria were excluded.

Results: Approximately 514/716 (71.8%) articles used non-PFL language. The publication year was predictive of non-PFL language: 1976-1991 (82.3%) vs 1992-2007 (72.3%, P = 0.0394) and 2008-2022 (68.3%, P = 0.0056). Non-PFL was significantly higher in obesity compared with other medical conditions (60.3% vs 7.3%, P < 0.001). The patient gender ( P = 0.111) and ethnicity ( P = 0.697), author's specialty ( P = 0.298), and primary English-speaking status ( P = 0.231), as well as the journal's impact factor ( P = 0.795), were not predictive of non-PFL.

Conclusions: Most literature focused on IIH use non-PFL when discussing overweight or obesity, regardless of the patient's gender and ethnicity, journal's impact factor, senior author's specialty, and English-speaking status. Non-PFL use is much more common when discussing obesity compared with other medical conditions. Appropriate use of PFL can decrease stigma and, more importantly, decrease the intersectionality of health stigma faced by patients with IIH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信