变性患者对所接受护理的满意度低于在学术医疗护理系统接受护理的顺性别患者。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
LGBT health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2023.0034
Mai-Han Trinh, Meg Quint, Devin Coon, Shalender Bhasin, Benjamin Tocci, Sari L Reisner
{"title":"变性患者对所接受护理的满意度低于在学术医疗护理系统接受护理的顺性别患者。","authors":"Mai-Han Trinh, Meg Quint, Devin Coon, Shalender Bhasin, Benjamin Tocci, Sari L Reisner","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients experience challenges in health care settings, including stigma, lack of culturally competent providers, and suboptimal gender-affirming care. However, differences in patient satisfaction between TGD patients compared with cisgender patients have been inadequately studied. This study aimed to assess such differences in patient satisfaction with care received in a large academic medical care system in Boston, Massachusetts. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Routine patient satisfaction surveys were fielded from January to December 2021 and were summarized. Logistic regression models compared low net promoter scores (NPS; ≤6) between gender identity groups (cisgender women, transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned female at birth [AFAB], transfeminine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned male at birth) relative to cisgender men, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, education, inpatient/outpatient service delivery, and distance from medical center. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 94,810 patients, 246 (0.3%) were TGD and 94,549 (99.7%) were cisgender. The mean age was 58.3 years (standard deviation = 16.6). Of the total sample, 17.0% of patients were people of color, 6.6% were Hispanic/Latinx, 48.6% were college graduates, and 2.6% had received inpatient care. In general, patient satisfaction with health care received was lower for TGD patients than for cisgender patients (7.3% vs. 4.5% reporting low NPS; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.85). Transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer patients AFAB had elevated odds of low NPS compared with cisgender men (8.8% vs. 3.6%; aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.02-2.89). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Future research is warranted to better understand factors driving lower ratings among TGD patients. Health care quality improvement efforts are needed to address gender identity inequities in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"202-209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transgender Patients Report Lower Satisfaction with Care Received than Cisgender Patients Receiving Care in an Academic Medical Care System.\",\"authors\":\"Mai-Han Trinh, Meg Quint, Devin Coon, Shalender Bhasin, Benjamin Tocci, Sari L Reisner\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients experience challenges in health care settings, including stigma, lack of culturally competent providers, and suboptimal gender-affirming care. However, differences in patient satisfaction between TGD patients compared with cisgender patients have been inadequately studied. This study aimed to assess such differences in patient satisfaction with care received in a large academic medical care system in Boston, Massachusetts. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Routine patient satisfaction surveys were fielded from January to December 2021 and were summarized. Logistic regression models compared low net promoter scores (NPS; ≤6) between gender identity groups (cisgender women, transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned female at birth [AFAB], transfeminine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned male at birth) relative to cisgender men, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, education, inpatient/outpatient service delivery, and distance from medical center. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 94,810 patients, 246 (0.3%) were TGD and 94,549 (99.7%) were cisgender. The mean age was 58.3 years (standard deviation = 16.6). Of the total sample, 17.0% of patients were people of color, 6.6% were Hispanic/Latinx, 48.6% were college graduates, and 2.6% had received inpatient care. In general, patient satisfaction with health care received was lower for TGD patients than for cisgender patients (7.3% vs. 4.5% reporting low NPS; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.85). Transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer patients AFAB had elevated odds of low NPS compared with cisgender men (8.8% vs. 3.6%; aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.02-2.89). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Future research is warranted to better understand factors driving lower ratings among TGD patients. Health care quality improvement efforts are needed to address gender identity inequities in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LGBT health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"202-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LGBT health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:跨性别和性别多元化(TGD)患者在医疗保健环境中会遇到各种挑战,包括污名化、缺乏具有文化能力的医疗服务提供者以及性别确认护理不理想。然而,对于变性和性别多元化患者与顺性别患者在患者满意度方面的差异还没有进行充分的研究。本研究旨在评估马萨诸塞州波士顿市一个大型学术医疗系统中患者对所接受护理的满意度差异。研究方法对 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间进行的常规患者满意度调查进行了汇总。逻辑回归模型比较了不同性别身份群体(顺性别女性、跨男性化和非二元/变性人出生时被指定为女性 [AFAB]、跨女性化和非二元/变性人出生时被指定为男性)相对于顺性别男性的低净促进者得分(NPS;≤6),并对年龄、种族、民族、教育程度、住院/门诊服务提供情况以及与医疗中心的距离进行了调整。结果显示在 94,810 名患者中,有 246 人(0.3%)为 TGD,94,549 人(99.7%)为顺性别。平均年龄为 58.3 岁(标准差 = 16.6)。在所有样本中,17.0% 的患者为有色人种,6.6% 为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,48.6% 为大学毕业生,2.6% 接受过住院治疗。总体而言,变性患者对医疗服务的满意度低于顺性别患者(7.3% 对 4.5%;调整后的赔率比 [aOR] = 1.14;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.70-1.85)。跨男性化和非二元/变性患者 AFAB 低 NPS 的几率高于顺性别男性(8.8% vs. 3.6%;aOR = 1.71;95% CI = 1.02-2.89)。结论未来的研究需要更好地了解导致 TGD 患者评分较低的因素。需要努力提高医疗质量,以解决护理中的性别认同不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transgender Patients Report Lower Satisfaction with Care Received than Cisgender Patients Receiving Care in an Academic Medical Care System.

Purpose: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients experience challenges in health care settings, including stigma, lack of culturally competent providers, and suboptimal gender-affirming care. However, differences in patient satisfaction between TGD patients compared with cisgender patients have been inadequately studied. This study aimed to assess such differences in patient satisfaction with care received in a large academic medical care system in Boston, Massachusetts. Methods: Routine patient satisfaction surveys were fielded from January to December 2021 and were summarized. Logistic regression models compared low net promoter scores (NPS; ≤6) between gender identity groups (cisgender women, transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned female at birth [AFAB], transfeminine and nonbinary/genderqueer people assigned male at birth) relative to cisgender men, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, education, inpatient/outpatient service delivery, and distance from medical center. Results: Of 94,810 patients, 246 (0.3%) were TGD and 94,549 (99.7%) were cisgender. The mean age was 58.3 years (standard deviation = 16.6). Of the total sample, 17.0% of patients were people of color, 6.6% were Hispanic/Latinx, 48.6% were college graduates, and 2.6% had received inpatient care. In general, patient satisfaction with health care received was lower for TGD patients than for cisgender patients (7.3% vs. 4.5% reporting low NPS; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.85). Transmasculine and nonbinary/genderqueer patients AFAB had elevated odds of low NPS compared with cisgender men (8.8% vs. 3.6%; aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.02-2.89). Conclusion: Future research is warranted to better understand factors driving lower ratings among TGD patients. Health care quality improvement efforts are needed to address gender identity inequities in care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信