利用商业规模的高压加工灭活果汁中的食源性病原体:酸味剂和 pH 值的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Food Science and Technology International Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/10820132231219525
Rebecca M Cheng, Jessie Usaga, Randy W Worobo
{"title":"利用商业规模的高压加工灭活果汁中的食源性病原体:酸味剂和 pH 值的影响。","authors":"Rebecca M Cheng, Jessie Usaga, Randy W Worobo","doi":"10.1177/10820132231219525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of juice pH, type of acidulant, and post-treatment refrigeration on the high-pressure processing (HPP) inactivation of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7, <i>Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> in acid beverages were evaluated. Inoculated apple, orange, and grape juices (at their original pH and adjusted to pH 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00) were treated at 550 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. In addition, inoculated model solutions acidified to a pH of 5.00 with acetic, citric, malic, and tartaric acids were treated at 400 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. The effect of refrigerated storage for 24 h after treatment on pathogen inactivation in both experiments was also assessed. A greater than 5-log reduction of the three pathogens inoculated was achieved in all juices immediately after HPP at the juices' original pH, and of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> under all experimental conditions. Refrigerated storage for 24 h after HPP treatment improved the inactivation of <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7, to >5-log reduction, at pH 4.00 in apple juice and of <i>Salmonella</i> in the three juices at pH 4.00. The type of acidulant did not significantly (<i>p </i>> 0.01) affect <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> inactivation in acidified model solutions but a greater than 5-log reduction after HPP was only achieved for <i>L. monocytogenes</i> when acetic acid was used. The effectiveness of HPP for pathogen inactivation depended largely on product pH and the target pathogen of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":12331,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology International","volume":" ","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foodborne pathogen inactivation in fruit juices utilizing commercial scale high-pressure processing: Effects of acidulants and pH.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca M Cheng, Jessie Usaga, Randy W Worobo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10820132231219525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effects of juice pH, type of acidulant, and post-treatment refrigeration on the high-pressure processing (HPP) inactivation of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7, <i>Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> in acid beverages were evaluated. Inoculated apple, orange, and grape juices (at their original pH and adjusted to pH 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00) were treated at 550 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. In addition, inoculated model solutions acidified to a pH of 5.00 with acetic, citric, malic, and tartaric acids were treated at 400 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. The effect of refrigerated storage for 24 h after treatment on pathogen inactivation in both experiments was also assessed. A greater than 5-log reduction of the three pathogens inoculated was achieved in all juices immediately after HPP at the juices' original pH, and of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> under all experimental conditions. Refrigerated storage for 24 h after HPP treatment improved the inactivation of <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7, to >5-log reduction, at pH 4.00 in apple juice and of <i>Salmonella</i> in the three juices at pH 4.00. The type of acidulant did not significantly (<i>p </i>> 0.01) affect <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> inactivation in acidified model solutions but a greater than 5-log reduction after HPP was only achieved for <i>L. monocytogenes</i> when acetic acid was used. The effectiveness of HPP for pathogen inactivation depended largely on product pH and the target pathogen of concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Technology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"592-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Technology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132231219525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132231219525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估了果汁 pH 值、酸味剂类型和处理后冷藏对高压处理(HPP)灭活酸性饮料中大肠杆菌 O157:H7、肠炎沙门氏菌和单核细胞增生李斯特菌的影响。接种的苹果汁、橙汁和葡萄汁(原始 pH 值和调整为 pH 4.00、4.50 和 5.00)在 5 ℃、550 MPa 的压力下处理 1 分钟。此外,用醋酸、柠檬酸、苹果酸和酒石酸酸化至 pH 值为 5.00 的接种模型溶液在 5 °C、400 兆帕处理 1 分钟。在这两项实验中,还评估了处理后冷藏 24 小时对病原体灭活的影响。在果汁的原始 pH 值下,所有果汁中的三种病原体都在 HPP 处理后立即减少了 5 个菌落,单核细胞增多性酵母菌也在所有实验条件下减少了 5 个菌落。在 HPP 处理后冷藏 24 小时,苹果汁中的大肠杆菌 O157:H7 在 pH 值为 4.00 时的灭活率提高到 5 个菌落以上,三种果汁中的沙门氏菌在 pH 值为 4.00 时的灭活率也提高到 5 个菌落以上。酸化剂的类型对酸化模型溶液中大肠杆菌或沙门氏菌的灭活没有显著影响(p > 0.01),但只有使用醋酸时,单核细胞增多性酵母菌在 HPP 后的灭活率才会超过 5-log。HPP 对病原体灭活的效果在很大程度上取决于产品的 pH 值和所关注的目标病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foodborne pathogen inactivation in fruit juices utilizing commercial scale high-pressure processing: Effects of acidulants and pH.

The effects of juice pH, type of acidulant, and post-treatment refrigeration on the high-pressure processing (HPP) inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes in acid beverages were evaluated. Inoculated apple, orange, and grape juices (at their original pH and adjusted to pH 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00) were treated at 550 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. In addition, inoculated model solutions acidified to a pH of 5.00 with acetic, citric, malic, and tartaric acids were treated at 400 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. The effect of refrigerated storage for 24 h after treatment on pathogen inactivation in both experiments was also assessed. A greater than 5-log reduction of the three pathogens inoculated was achieved in all juices immediately after HPP at the juices' original pH, and of L. monocytogenes under all experimental conditions. Refrigerated storage for 24 h after HPP treatment improved the inactivation of E. coli O157:H7, to >5-log reduction, at pH 4.00 in apple juice and of Salmonella in the three juices at pH 4.00. The type of acidulant did not significantly (p > 0.01) affect E. coli or Salmonella inactivation in acidified model solutions but a greater than 5-log reduction after HPP was only achieved for L. monocytogenes when acetic acid was used. The effectiveness of HPP for pathogen inactivation depended largely on product pH and the target pathogen of concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science and Technology International
Food Science and Technology International 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science and Technology International (FSTI) shares knowledge from leading researchers of food science and technology. Covers food processing and engineering, food safety and preservation, food biotechnology, and physical, chemical and sensory properties of foods. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信