作为剖腹产后疼痛多模式镇痛方案一部分的连续伤口输液导管:质量改进影响研究

Cedar Fowler , Emily Stockert , Dan Hoang , Nan Guo , Edward Riley , Pervez Sultan , Brendan Carvalho
{"title":"作为剖腹产后疼痛多模式镇痛方案一部分的连续伤口输液导管:质量改进影响研究","authors":"Cedar Fowler ,&nbsp;Emily Stockert ,&nbsp;Dan Hoang ,&nbsp;Nan Guo ,&nbsp;Edward Riley ,&nbsp;Pervez Sultan ,&nbsp;Brendan Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of continuous wound infusion catheters as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy after Caesarean delivery is unclear. We introduced continuous wound infusion catheters to our multimodal analgesia regimen to evaluate the impact on analgesic outcomes after Caesarean delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a 4-month practice change was instituted as a quality improvement initiative. In addition to multimodal analgesia, continuous wound infusion catheters for up to 3 days were offered on alternate weeks for all women undergoing Caesarean deliveries. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores at 24 and 72 h, time until first analgesic request, opioid-related side-effects, length of stay, satisfaction (0–100%), and continuous wound infusion catheter-related complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All women scheduled for Caesarean delivery (<em>n</em>=139) in the 4-month period were included in the analysis, with 70 women receiving continuous wound infusion catheters, and 69 in the control group. Opioid consumption (continuous wound infusion catheter group 11.3 [7.5–61.9] mg morphine equivalents <em>vs</em> control group 30.0 [11.3–48.8] mg morphine equivalents), pain scores (except 24 h resting pain scores which were higher in the control group 2 [1–3] <em>vs</em> 1.5 [0–3] in the continous wound infusion catheters group; <em>P</em>=0.05), side-effects, length of stay, and complications were similar between groups. Satisfaction scores at 24 h were higher with continuous wound infusion catheters (100% [91–100%] <em>vs</em> 90% [86–100%]; <em>P</em>=0.003) with no differences at 72 h. One patient demonstrated symptoms of systemic local anaesthetic toxicity which resolved without significant harm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The addition of continuous wound infusion catheters to a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain management demonstrated minimal clinically significant analgesic benefits. Future studies are needed to explore the use of continuous wound infusion catheters in populations that may benefit most from this intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001211/pdfft?md5=41a73c7c696ee5a9aa704f384aa8e1a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609623001211-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous wound infusion catheter as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain: a quality improvement impact study\",\"authors\":\"Cedar Fowler ,&nbsp;Emily Stockert ,&nbsp;Dan Hoang ,&nbsp;Nan Guo ,&nbsp;Edward Riley ,&nbsp;Pervez Sultan ,&nbsp;Brendan Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of continuous wound infusion catheters as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy after Caesarean delivery is unclear. We introduced continuous wound infusion catheters to our multimodal analgesia regimen to evaluate the impact on analgesic outcomes after Caesarean delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a 4-month practice change was instituted as a quality improvement initiative. In addition to multimodal analgesia, continuous wound infusion catheters for up to 3 days were offered on alternate weeks for all women undergoing Caesarean deliveries. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores at 24 and 72 h, time until first analgesic request, opioid-related side-effects, length of stay, satisfaction (0–100%), and continuous wound infusion catheter-related complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All women scheduled for Caesarean delivery (<em>n</em>=139) in the 4-month period were included in the analysis, with 70 women receiving continuous wound infusion catheters, and 69 in the control group. Opioid consumption (continuous wound infusion catheter group 11.3 [7.5–61.9] mg morphine equivalents <em>vs</em> control group 30.0 [11.3–48.8] mg morphine equivalents), pain scores (except 24 h resting pain scores which were higher in the control group 2 [1–3] <em>vs</em> 1.5 [0–3] in the continous wound infusion catheters group; <em>P</em>=0.05), side-effects, length of stay, and complications were similar between groups. Satisfaction scores at 24 h were higher with continuous wound infusion catheters (100% [91–100%] <em>vs</em> 90% [86–100%]; <em>P</em>=0.003) with no differences at 72 h. One patient demonstrated symptoms of systemic local anaesthetic toxicity which resolved without significant harm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The addition of continuous wound infusion catheters to a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain management demonstrated minimal clinically significant analgesic benefits. Future studies are needed to explore the use of continuous wound infusion catheters in populations that may benefit most from this intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001211/pdfft?md5=41a73c7c696ee5a9aa704f384aa8e1a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609623001211-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景连续伤口输液导管作为剖腹产后多模式镇痛策略的一部分,其作用尚不明确。我们在多模式镇痛方案中引入了连续伤口输注导管,以评估其对剖腹产后镇痛效果的影响。除多模式镇痛外,还为所有剖腹产产妇隔周提供长达 3 天的连续伤口输液导管。主要结果是术后院内阿片类药物的消耗量。次要结果为24小时和72小时的静态和动态疼痛评分、首次申请镇痛药前的时间、阿片类药物相关副作用、住院时间、满意度(0-100%)以及伤口持续输注导管相关并发症。结果 所有在4个月内计划剖腹产的产妇(n=139)均纳入分析,其中70名产妇接受伤口持续输注导管,69名产妇接受对照组。各组间的阿片类药物消耗量(持续伤口输注导管组为11.3 [7.5-61.9] 毫克吗啡当量,对照组为30.0 [11.3-48.8] 毫克吗啡当量)、疼痛评分(24 小时静息痛评分除外,对照组为2 [1-3] 分,持续伤口输注导管组为1.5 [0-3] 分;P=0.05)、副作用、住院时间和并发症相似。一名患者出现了全身局麻药中毒症状,但症状缓解后并无大碍。结论在剖宫产术后疼痛治疗的多模式镇痛方案中加入连续伤口输注导管的临床镇痛效果甚微。未来的研究需要探索在可能从这种干预措施中获益最多的人群中使用连续伤口输注导管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous wound infusion catheter as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain: a quality improvement impact study

Background

The role of continuous wound infusion catheters as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy after Caesarean delivery is unclear. We introduced continuous wound infusion catheters to our multimodal analgesia regimen to evaluate the impact on analgesic outcomes after Caesarean delivery.

Methods

After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a 4-month practice change was instituted as a quality improvement initiative. In addition to multimodal analgesia, continuous wound infusion catheters for up to 3 days were offered on alternate weeks for all women undergoing Caesarean deliveries. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores at 24 and 72 h, time until first analgesic request, opioid-related side-effects, length of stay, satisfaction (0–100%), and continuous wound infusion catheter-related complications.

Results

All women scheduled for Caesarean delivery (n=139) in the 4-month period were included in the analysis, with 70 women receiving continuous wound infusion catheters, and 69 in the control group. Opioid consumption (continuous wound infusion catheter group 11.3 [7.5–61.9] mg morphine equivalents vs control group 30.0 [11.3–48.8] mg morphine equivalents), pain scores (except 24 h resting pain scores which were higher in the control group 2 [1–3] vs 1.5 [0–3] in the continous wound infusion catheters group; P=0.05), side-effects, length of stay, and complications were similar between groups. Satisfaction scores at 24 h were higher with continuous wound infusion catheters (100% [91–100%] vs 90% [86–100%]; P=0.003) with no differences at 72 h. One patient demonstrated symptoms of systemic local anaesthetic toxicity which resolved without significant harm.

Conclusions

The addition of continuous wound infusion catheters to a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain management demonstrated minimal clinically significant analgesic benefits. Future studies are needed to explore the use of continuous wound infusion catheters in populations that may benefit most from this intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信