评估苹果园附近的残留植被管理做法,以支持本地蜜蜂授粉者

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Amber L. Spronk, Greg R. Guerin, Irene Martín-Forés, Andrew J. Lowe, Katja Hogendoorn
{"title":"评估苹果园附近的残留植被管理做法,以支持本地蜜蜂授粉者","authors":"Amber L. Spronk, Greg R. Guerin, Irene Martín-Forés, Andrew J. Lowe, Katja Hogendoorn","doi":"10.1111/emr.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintenance of a diverse pollinator community helps ensure resilience in pollination services. Fragments of woody and grassy vegetation in the vicinity of croplands have been shown to encourage the presence of crop-pollinating bees. However, to date, little attention has been given to the management practices that may enhance the presence of bees in such fragments. We investigated how the maintenance of remnant forest fragments adjacent to apple orchards in South Australia affects floral resources and native bee communities. The fragments had been subject to either (a) fire (assessments three years post-burn), (b) cattle grazing under trees and (c) low maintenance management (>20 years not grazed or burnt). Plant communities were sampled along transects in plots. Bee communities were sampled using hand netting. We fitted generalised linear mixed models to investigate differences in plant and bee diversity between treatments and to elucidate the effect of plant diversity on bee diversity. We compared plant and bee community composition among treatments using non-metric multidimensional scaling and conducted network analysis to measure the robustness of plant-pollinator interactions to the removal of species. Both floral resource abundance and bee diversity were higher in burnt and low-maintenance fragments than in grazed fragments. Bee species richness was positively associated with plant species richness. The species richness of bees that visit apple flowers was positively associated with flower abundance but not with floral species richness. Plant-pollinator networks in grazed sites had fewer links per species and a higher proportion of realised links than those under other management practices. However, the resilience of pollinator networks did not differ significantly between management practices. Thus, controlled burns or low-maintenance management of forest fragments appear to be the most suitable landscape management practices to support apple pollinating bees. Burning requires consideration of additional ecological consequences, such as the conservation of fire-sensitive species and specialist woodland fauna. Cattle grazing adjacent to orchards results in simplified bee communities and pollination networks and is not recommended if pollination services are required for adjacent land uses. This information can benefit orchardist as well as managers of fragments of native vegetation adjacent to orchard crops.","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating remnant vegetation management practices adjacent to apple orchards to support native bee pollinators\",\"authors\":\"Amber L. Spronk, Greg R. Guerin, Irene Martín-Forés, Andrew J. Lowe, Katja Hogendoorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maintenance of a diverse pollinator community helps ensure resilience in pollination services. Fragments of woody and grassy vegetation in the vicinity of croplands have been shown to encourage the presence of crop-pollinating bees. However, to date, little attention has been given to the management practices that may enhance the presence of bees in such fragments. We investigated how the maintenance of remnant forest fragments adjacent to apple orchards in South Australia affects floral resources and native bee communities. The fragments had been subject to either (a) fire (assessments three years post-burn), (b) cattle grazing under trees and (c) low maintenance management (>20 years not grazed or burnt). Plant communities were sampled along transects in plots. Bee communities were sampled using hand netting. We fitted generalised linear mixed models to investigate differences in plant and bee diversity between treatments and to elucidate the effect of plant diversity on bee diversity. We compared plant and bee community composition among treatments using non-metric multidimensional scaling and conducted network analysis to measure the robustness of plant-pollinator interactions to the removal of species. Both floral resource abundance and bee diversity were higher in burnt and low-maintenance fragments than in grazed fragments. Bee species richness was positively associated with plant species richness. The species richness of bees that visit apple flowers was positively associated with flower abundance but not with floral species richness. Plant-pollinator networks in grazed sites had fewer links per species and a higher proportion of realised links than those under other management practices. However, the resilience of pollinator networks did not differ significantly between management practices. Thus, controlled burns or low-maintenance management of forest fragments appear to be the most suitable landscape management practices to support apple pollinating bees. Burning requires consideration of additional ecological consequences, such as the conservation of fire-sensitive species and specialist woodland fauna. Cattle grazing adjacent to orchards results in simplified bee communities and pollination networks and is not recommended if pollination services are required for adjacent land uses. This information can benefit orchardist as well as managers of fragments of native vegetation adjacent to orchard crops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12588\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维持一个多样化的授粉者群落有助于确保授粉服务的复原力。耕地附近的木本和草本植被片段已被证明能促进作物授粉蜜蜂的出现。然而,迄今为止,人们很少关注可提高蜜蜂在这些植被片段中出现率的管理方法。我们研究了在南澳大利亚苹果园附近维护残余森林如何影响花卉资源和本地蜜蜂群落。这些森林片段曾经历过以下三种情况:(a)火灾(火灾后三年评估);(b)牛群在树下放牧;(c)低维护管理(20 年未放牧或焚烧)。沿地块横断面对植物群落进行采样。蜜蜂群落采用手抄网采样。我们采用广义线性混合模型来研究不同处理间植物和蜜蜂多样性的差异,并阐明植物多样性对蜜蜂多样性的影响。我们使用非度量多维标度法比较了不同处理间的植物和蜜蜂群落组成,并进行了网络分析,以衡量植物与授粉者之间的相互作用对物种移除的稳健性。与放牧区相比,焚烧区和低维护区的花卉资源丰度和蜜蜂多样性都更高。蜜蜂物种丰富度与植物物种丰富度呈正相关。访问苹果花的蜜蜂物种丰富度与花的丰度呈正相关,但与花的物种丰富度无关。与其他管理方法相比,放牧地的植物-授粉者网络中每个物种的链接较少,实现链接的比例较高。然而,不同管理方法下授粉者网络的恢复力并无显著差异。因此,控制燃烧或低维护森林片段管理似乎是最适合支持苹果授粉蜂的景观管理方法。焚烧需要考虑其他生态后果,如保护对火敏感的物种和专业林地动物。在果园附近放牧会导致蜜蜂群落和授粉网络的简化,如果邻近土地使用需要授粉服务,则不建议这样做。这些信息可使果园管理者以及果园作物附近原生植被片段的管理者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating remnant vegetation management practices adjacent to apple orchards to support native bee pollinators
Maintenance of a diverse pollinator community helps ensure resilience in pollination services. Fragments of woody and grassy vegetation in the vicinity of croplands have been shown to encourage the presence of crop-pollinating bees. However, to date, little attention has been given to the management practices that may enhance the presence of bees in such fragments. We investigated how the maintenance of remnant forest fragments adjacent to apple orchards in South Australia affects floral resources and native bee communities. The fragments had been subject to either (a) fire (assessments three years post-burn), (b) cattle grazing under trees and (c) low maintenance management (>20 years not grazed or burnt). Plant communities were sampled along transects in plots. Bee communities were sampled using hand netting. We fitted generalised linear mixed models to investigate differences in plant and bee diversity between treatments and to elucidate the effect of plant diversity on bee diversity. We compared plant and bee community composition among treatments using non-metric multidimensional scaling and conducted network analysis to measure the robustness of plant-pollinator interactions to the removal of species. Both floral resource abundance and bee diversity were higher in burnt and low-maintenance fragments than in grazed fragments. Bee species richness was positively associated with plant species richness. The species richness of bees that visit apple flowers was positively associated with flower abundance but not with floral species richness. Plant-pollinator networks in grazed sites had fewer links per species and a higher proportion of realised links than those under other management practices. However, the resilience of pollinator networks did not differ significantly between management practices. Thus, controlled burns or low-maintenance management of forest fragments appear to be the most suitable landscape management practices to support apple pollinating bees. Burning requires consideration of additional ecological consequences, such as the conservation of fire-sensitive species and specialist woodland fauna. Cattle grazing adjacent to orchards results in simplified bee communities and pollination networks and is not recommended if pollination services are required for adjacent land uses. This information can benefit orchardist as well as managers of fragments of native vegetation adjacent to orchard crops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信