冠状动脉钙化评分与冠状动脉狭窄之间的关系

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xinyan Chen, Jianbin Zhao, Qingqing Cai, Rong Chen, Wenhao Wu, Peng Wang, Gaoxing Zhang, Jinhuan Zhen
{"title":"冠状动脉钙化评分与冠状动脉狭窄之间的关系","authors":"Xinyan Chen, Jianbin Zhao, Qingqing Cai, Rong Chen, Wenhao Wu, Peng Wang, Gaoxing Zhang, Jinhuan Zhen","doi":"10.1155/2023/5538111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is commonly employed to quantify the degree of calcification in coronary atherosclerosis. Indeed, increased coronary stenosis severity is associated with a progressive increase in CACS. <i>Objectives</i>. This study sought to explore the association between CACS and coronary stenosis of ≥50% and ≥70%. <i>Methods</i>. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data collected between July 1, 2017, and March 3, 2022, at Jiangmen Central Hospital. A total of 208 patients, presenting with both symptomatic and asymptomatic manifestations and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), were included. Statistical analyses included ROC curve assessments, subgroup analyses based on age, and comparisons of CACS values against the presence of coronary stenosis ≥50% and ≥70%. <i>Results</i>. Ultimately, 208 patients were included, with a median age of 65.0 years and a median CACS of 115.7 (interquartile range: 13.7–369.4). A CACS threshold of ≥1300 demonstrated a specificity of 100% for coronary stenosis of ≥50%. Notably, the percentage of patients with obstructive CAD showing CACS = 0 was significantly higher in those under 65 years (15.1%) compared to patients over 65 years (3.8%) (<span><svg height=\"8.8423pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2064009pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 8.8423\" width=\"19.289pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"8.8423pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2064009pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"22.8711838 -8.6359 28.182 8.8423\" width=\"28.182pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,44.605,0)\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> The inflection point, at which the risk probability for coronary stenosis of ≥50% shifted from being a protective factor to a risk factor, was observed when CACS fell within the range of 63.3 to 66.0. <i>Conclusion</i>. CACS demonstrates good performance for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"9 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Coronary Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Xinyan Chen, Jianbin Zhao, Qingqing Cai, Rong Chen, Wenhao Wu, Peng Wang, Gaoxing Zhang, Jinhuan Zhen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5538111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Background</i>. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is commonly employed to quantify the degree of calcification in coronary atherosclerosis. Indeed, increased coronary stenosis severity is associated with a progressive increase in CACS. <i>Objectives</i>. This study sought to explore the association between CACS and coronary stenosis of ≥50% and ≥70%. <i>Methods</i>. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data collected between July 1, 2017, and March 3, 2022, at Jiangmen Central Hospital. A total of 208 patients, presenting with both symptomatic and asymptomatic manifestations and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), were included. Statistical analyses included ROC curve assessments, subgroup analyses based on age, and comparisons of CACS values against the presence of coronary stenosis ≥50% and ≥70%. <i>Results</i>. Ultimately, 208 patients were included, with a median age of 65.0 years and a median CACS of 115.7 (interquartile range: 13.7–369.4). A CACS threshold of ≥1300 demonstrated a specificity of 100% for coronary stenosis of ≥50%. Notably, the percentage of patients with obstructive CAD showing CACS = 0 was significantly higher in those under 65 years (15.1%) compared to patients over 65 years (3.8%) (<span><svg height=\\\"8.8423pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.2064009pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 8.8423\\\" width=\\\"19.289pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\\\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\\\"8.8423pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.2064009pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"22.8711838 -8.6359 28.182 8.8423\\\" width=\\\"28.182pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-49\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-49\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,44.605,0)\\\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> The inflection point, at which the risk probability for coronary stenosis of ≥50% shifted from being a protective factor to a risk factor, was observed when CACS fell within the range of 63.3 to 66.0. <i>Conclusion</i>. CACS demonstrates good performance for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5538111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5538111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)通常用于量化冠状动脉粥样硬化的钙化程度。事实上,冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的增加与 CACS 的逐渐增加有关。研究目的本研究旨在探讨 CACS 与冠状动脉狭窄≥50% 和≥70% 之间的关系。方法。我们对江门市中心医院2017年7月1日至2022年3月3日期间收集的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。共纳入了208名有症状和无症状表现的疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者。统计分析包括ROC曲线评估、基于年龄的亚组分析以及CACS值与冠状动脉狭窄≥50%和≥70%的比较。结果。最终共纳入 208 名患者,中位年龄为 65.0 岁,中位 CACS 为 115.7(四分位间范围:13.7-369.4)。CACS阈值≥1300表明冠状动脉狭窄≥50%的特异性为100%。值得注意的是,与 65 岁以上的患者(3.8%)相比,65 岁以下患者(15.1%)中显示 CACS = 0 的阻塞性 CAD 患者比例明显更高()。当 CACS 在 63.3 到 66.0 的范围内时,冠状动脉狭窄≥50% 的风险概率从保护因素转变为风险因素的拐点就出现了。结论CACS 在检测冠状动脉狭窄方面表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Coronary Stenosis
Background. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is commonly employed to quantify the degree of calcification in coronary atherosclerosis. Indeed, increased coronary stenosis severity is associated with a progressive increase in CACS. Objectives. This study sought to explore the association between CACS and coronary stenosis of ≥50% and ≥70%. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data collected between July 1, 2017, and March 3, 2022, at Jiangmen Central Hospital. A total of 208 patients, presenting with both symptomatic and asymptomatic manifestations and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), were included. Statistical analyses included ROC curve assessments, subgroup analyses based on age, and comparisons of CACS values against the presence of coronary stenosis ≥50% and ≥70%. Results. Ultimately, 208 patients were included, with a median age of 65.0 years and a median CACS of 115.7 (interquartile range: 13.7–369.4). A CACS threshold of ≥1300 demonstrated a specificity of 100% for coronary stenosis of ≥50%. Notably, the percentage of patients with obstructive CAD showing CACS = 0 was significantly higher in those under 65 years (15.1%) compared to patients over 65 years (3.8%) (). The inflection point, at which the risk probability for coronary stenosis of ≥50% shifted from being a protective factor to a risk factor, was observed when CACS fell within the range of 63.3 to 66.0. Conclusion. CACS demonstrates good performance for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信