支气管镜相关疫情和伪疫情:系统回顾

Loukas Kakoullis, Sofia Economidou, Preeti Mehrotra, George Panos, Theodoros Karampitsakos, Grigorios Stratakos, Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Fotios Sampsonas
{"title":"支气管镜相关疫情和伪疫情:系统回顾","authors":"Loukas Kakoullis, Sofia Economidou, Preeti Mehrotra, George Panos, Theodoros Karampitsakos, Grigorios Stratakos, Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Fotios Sampsonas","doi":"10.1017/ice.2023.250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify and report the pathogens and sources of contamination associated with bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Inpatient and outpatient outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks after bronchoscopy. Methods: PubMed/Medline databases were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms “bronchoscopy,” “outbreak,” and “pseudo-outbreak” from inception until December 31, 2022. From eligible publications, data were extracted regarding the type of event, pathogen involved, and source of contamination. Pearson correlation was used to identify correlations between variables. Results: In total, 74 studies describing 23 outbreaks and 52 pseudo-outbreaks were included in this review. The major pathogens identified in these studies were <jats:italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</jats:italic>, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), <jats:italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Serratia marcescens</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Legionella pneumophila</jats:italic>, and fungi. The primary sources of contamination were the use of contaminated water or contaminated topical anesthetics, dysfunction and contamination of bronchoscopes or automatic endoscope reprocessors, and inadequate disinfection of the bronchoscopes following procedures. Correlations were identified between primary bronchoscope defects and the identification of <jats:italic>P. aeruginosa</jats:italic> (r = 0.351; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .002) and <jats:italic>K. pneumoniae</jats:italic> (r = 0.346; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .002), and between the presence of a contaminated water source and NTM (r = 0.331; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004) or <jats:italic>L. pneumophila</jats:italic> (r = 0.280; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .015). Conclusions: Continued vigilance in bronchoscopy disinfection practices remains essential because outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks continue to pose a significant risk to patient care, emphasizing the importance of stringent disinfection and quality control measures.","PeriodicalId":13558,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Loukas Kakoullis, Sofia Economidou, Preeti Mehrotra, George Panos, Theodoros Karampitsakos, Grigorios Stratakos, Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Fotios Sampsonas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2023.250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To identify and report the pathogens and sources of contamination associated with bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Inpatient and outpatient outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks after bronchoscopy. Methods: PubMed/Medline databases were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms “bronchoscopy,” “outbreak,” and “pseudo-outbreak” from inception until December 31, 2022. From eligible publications, data were extracted regarding the type of event, pathogen involved, and source of contamination. Pearson correlation was used to identify correlations between variables. Results: In total, 74 studies describing 23 outbreaks and 52 pseudo-outbreaks were included in this review. The major pathogens identified in these studies were <jats:italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</jats:italic>, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), <jats:italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Serratia marcescens</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Legionella pneumophila</jats:italic>, and fungi. The primary sources of contamination were the use of contaminated water or contaminated topical anesthetics, dysfunction and contamination of bronchoscopes or automatic endoscope reprocessors, and inadequate disinfection of the bronchoscopes following procedures. Correlations were identified between primary bronchoscope defects and the identification of <jats:italic>P. aeruginosa</jats:italic> (r = 0.351; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .002) and <jats:italic>K. pneumoniae</jats:italic> (r = 0.346; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .002), and between the presence of a contaminated water source and NTM (r = 0.331; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004) or <jats:italic>L. pneumophila</jats:italic> (r = 0.280; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .015). Conclusions: Continued vigilance in bronchoscopy disinfection practices remains essential because outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks continue to pose a significant risk to patient care, emphasizing the importance of stringent disinfection and quality control measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定并报告与支气管镜检查相关的疫情爆发和假性疫情爆发有关的病原体和污染源。设计:系统回顾。地点:支气管镜检查后的住院和门诊爆发及假性爆发。方法:PubMed/Medline 数据库:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南,使用 "支气管镜"、"暴发 "和 "伪暴发 "等检索词对 PubMedline/Medline 数据库进行检索,检索时间从开始到 2022 年 12 月 31 日。从符合条件的出版物中提取有关事件类型、涉及病原体和污染源的数据。采用皮尔逊相关法确定变量之间的相关性。结果:本综述共纳入了 74 项研究,其中描述了 23 起疫情爆发和 52 起假性疫情爆发。在这些研究中发现的主要病原体有铜绿假单胞菌、结核分枝杆菌、非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)、肺炎克雷伯菌、肉毒杆菌沙雷氏菌、嗜麦芽血单胞菌、嗜肺军团菌和真菌。污染的主要来源是使用受污染的水或受污染的局部麻醉剂、支气管镜或自动内窥镜再处理机的功能障碍和污染,以及手术后支气管镜消毒不充分。原发性支气管镜缺陷与铜绿假单胞菌(r = 0.351; P = .002)和肺炎双球菌(r = 0.346; P = .002)的鉴定之间存在相关性,受污染水源的存在与NTM(r = 0.331; P = .004)或嗜肺杆菌(r = 0.280; P = .015)的鉴定之间也存在相关性。结论由于疫情爆发和假性疫情爆发继续对患者护理构成重大风险,因此在支气管镜消毒实践中继续保持警惕仍然至关重要,这也强调了严格消毒和质量控制措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks: A systematic review
Objective: To identify and report the pathogens and sources of contamination associated with bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Inpatient and outpatient outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks after bronchoscopy. Methods: PubMed/Medline databases were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms “bronchoscopy,” “outbreak,” and “pseudo-outbreak” from inception until December 31, 2022. From eligible publications, data were extracted regarding the type of event, pathogen involved, and source of contamination. Pearson correlation was used to identify correlations between variables. Results: In total, 74 studies describing 23 outbreaks and 52 pseudo-outbreaks were included in this review. The major pathogens identified in these studies were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Legionella pneumophila, and fungi. The primary sources of contamination were the use of contaminated water or contaminated topical anesthetics, dysfunction and contamination of bronchoscopes or automatic endoscope reprocessors, and inadequate disinfection of the bronchoscopes following procedures. Correlations were identified between primary bronchoscope defects and the identification of P. aeruginosa (r = 0.351; P = .002) and K. pneumoniae (r = 0.346; P = .002), and between the presence of a contaminated water source and NTM (r = 0.331; P = .004) or L. pneumophila (r = 0.280; P = .015). Conclusions: Continued vigilance in bronchoscopy disinfection practices remains essential because outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks continue to pose a significant risk to patient care, emphasizing the importance of stringent disinfection and quality control measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信