在埃塞俄比亚麻醉学本科课程的一个临床模块中实施基于团队的学习以及学生的观点:试点横断面研究

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hailemariam Mulugeta, Abebayehu Zemedkun
{"title":"在埃塞俄比亚麻醉学本科课程的一个临床模块中实施基于团队的学习以及学生的观点:试点横断面研究","authors":"Hailemariam Mulugeta, Abebayehu Zemedkun","doi":"10.2147/amep.s437710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Introduction:</strong> Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy that gives students the opportunity to apply conceptual information through a series of tasks that incorporate individual effort, team collaboration, and immediate feedback. This study aimed to report baseline TBL implementation in a clinical module of a fourth-year competency-based undergraduate anesthesia curriculum and explore the perspectives of students.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> In April 2023, 18 students participated in two TBL sessions over two weeks, and readiness assurance test results and post-TBL evaluations were analyzed. Week one TBL implementation scores were compared with week two, establishing a longitudinal analysis over two points in time. Students also participated in an online survey to assess their views on the advantages and design of TBL, their perceptions of its best and worst features, and their suggestions for its implementation.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Of 18 students, 16 (89%) responded to the survey. Most students believed that TBL was an effective educational strategy but expressed concern about the amount of time required for TBL preparation and the need for student readiness. The individual readiness assurance test scores did not differ significantly between weeks 1 and 2 (mean difference [MD] = 0.39, P= 0.519, 95% CI: − 0.824 to 1.60). However, the students’ median [IQR] team readiness assurance test scores increased significantly from week one to week two, from 8 [2] to 10 [1] (p = 0.004). Peer evaluation scores also showed a significant increase in week 2 (MD = 2.4, P = 0.001, 95% CI: − 3.760 to − 0.996).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> TBL was successfully implemented for a clinical module at Dilla University—Ethiopia for the first time. Students perceived it positively, but some criticized its preparation time, workload, and minimal facilitator engagement. We suggest convenient and flexible scheduling personalized for each student’s needs when TBL is applied for clinical modules.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> team-based learning, competency-based education, clinical, anesthetics, pilot implementation, medical education research<br/>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Team-Based Learning for a Clinical Module of the Ethiopian Undergraduate Anesthesia Curriculum and Students’ Perspectives: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Hailemariam Mulugeta, Abebayehu Zemedkun\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/amep.s437710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Introduction:</strong> Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy that gives students the opportunity to apply conceptual information through a series of tasks that incorporate individual effort, team collaboration, and immediate feedback. This study aimed to report baseline TBL implementation in a clinical module of a fourth-year competency-based undergraduate anesthesia curriculum and explore the perspectives of students.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> In April 2023, 18 students participated in two TBL sessions over two weeks, and readiness assurance test results and post-TBL evaluations were analyzed. Week one TBL implementation scores were compared with week two, establishing a longitudinal analysis over two points in time. Students also participated in an online survey to assess their views on the advantages and design of TBL, their perceptions of its best and worst features, and their suggestions for its implementation.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Of 18 students, 16 (89%) responded to the survey. Most students believed that TBL was an effective educational strategy but expressed concern about the amount of time required for TBL preparation and the need for student readiness. The individual readiness assurance test scores did not differ significantly between weeks 1 and 2 (mean difference [MD] = 0.39, P= 0.519, 95% CI: − 0.824 to 1.60). However, the students’ median [IQR] team readiness assurance test scores increased significantly from week one to week two, from 8 [2] to 10 [1] (p = 0.004). Peer evaluation scores also showed a significant increase in week 2 (MD = 2.4, P = 0.001, 95% CI: − 3.760 to − 0.996).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> TBL was successfully implemented for a clinical module at Dilla University—Ethiopia for the first time. Students perceived it positively, but some criticized its preparation time, workload, and minimal facilitator engagement. We suggest convenient and flexible scheduling personalized for each student’s needs when TBL is applied for clinical modules.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> team-based learning, competency-based education, clinical, anesthetics, pilot implementation, medical education research<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s437710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s437710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种主动学习策略,通过一系列包含个人努力、团队协作和即时反馈的任务,为学生提供应用概念信息的机会。本研究旨在报告以能力为基础的四年级麻醉学本科课程临床模块中的 TBL 实施基线,并探讨学生的观点:2023年4月,18名学生参加了为期两周的两次TBL课程,并对准备保证测试结果和TBL后评估进行了分析。第一周的 TBL 实施得分与第二周的得分进行了比较,建立了两个时间点的纵向分析。学生们还参与了一项在线调查,以评估他们对 TBL 的优势和设计的看法、对其最佳和最差特点的认识以及对其实施的建议:在 18 名学生中,有 16 名(89%)对调查做出了回应。大多数学生认为 TBL 是一种有效的教育策略,但对 TBL 准备所需的时间和学生准备的必要性表示担忧。在第 1 周和第 2 周之间,个人准备保证测试分数没有明显差异(平均差异 [MD] = 0.39,P= 0.519,95% CI:- 0.824 至 1.60)。但是,从第一周到第二周,学生的团队准备保证测试得分中位数[IQR]明显增加,从8[2]增加到10[1](P = 0.004)。同行评价得分在第二周也有明显提高(MD = 2.4,P = 0.001,95% CI:- 3.760 至 - 0.996):TBL在埃塞俄比亚迪拉大学的临床模块中首次成功实施。学生们对其评价积极,但也有一些学生对其准备时间、工作量和主持人的参与度提出了批评。我们建议,在临床模块中应用 TBL 时,应根据每个学生的需求制定方便灵活的个性化时间安排。 关键词:基于团队的学习;基于能力的教育;临床;麻醉学;试点实施;医学教育研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of Team-Based Learning for a Clinical Module of the Ethiopian Undergraduate Anesthesia Curriculum and Students’ Perspectives: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study
Introduction: Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy that gives students the opportunity to apply conceptual information through a series of tasks that incorporate individual effort, team collaboration, and immediate feedback. This study aimed to report baseline TBL implementation in a clinical module of a fourth-year competency-based undergraduate anesthesia curriculum and explore the perspectives of students.
Methods: In April 2023, 18 students participated in two TBL sessions over two weeks, and readiness assurance test results and post-TBL evaluations were analyzed. Week one TBL implementation scores were compared with week two, establishing a longitudinal analysis over two points in time. Students also participated in an online survey to assess their views on the advantages and design of TBL, their perceptions of its best and worst features, and their suggestions for its implementation.
Results: Of 18 students, 16 (89%) responded to the survey. Most students believed that TBL was an effective educational strategy but expressed concern about the amount of time required for TBL preparation and the need for student readiness. The individual readiness assurance test scores did not differ significantly between weeks 1 and 2 (mean difference [MD] = 0.39, P= 0.519, 95% CI: − 0.824 to 1.60). However, the students’ median [IQR] team readiness assurance test scores increased significantly from week one to week two, from 8 [2] to 10 [1] (p = 0.004). Peer evaluation scores also showed a significant increase in week 2 (MD = 2.4, P = 0.001, 95% CI: − 3.760 to − 0.996).
Conclusion: TBL was successfully implemented for a clinical module at Dilla University—Ethiopia for the first time. Students perceived it positively, but some criticized its preparation time, workload, and minimal facilitator engagement. We suggest convenient and flexible scheduling personalized for each student’s needs when TBL is applied for clinical modules.

Keywords: team-based learning, competency-based education, clinical, anesthetics, pilot implementation, medical education research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信